On Jun 15, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
>
> The error isn't in your code, I've duplicated this with much
> simpler code.
>
> {{{
> %cython
> from sage.rings.all import CC
> def foo(z):
> return CC(z)
> }}}
>
> {{{
> complex_plot(foo,(0,1),(0,1))
> ///
> Traceback (click to the left
On Jun 16, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Nick
> Alexander wrote:
>>
>>> Also, there are probably lots of modules and classes where an
>>> alphabetical listing is way better than the one they are in in the
>>> code since the alphabetical is at least
> Interesting. I thought it was supposed to have faster Javascript. One
> of the reasons I like the processing.js method is that it should work
> on browsers such as mobile Safari. Testing that site in mobile Safari
> on my 1st gen iPod Touch, it loads, but it doesn't seem to pass dragging
> to th
On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:19 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Personally, I prefer the Mathematica notation because I can actually
> read it. I have (serious!) trouble reading the current notation that
> Sage uses and I can barely read the Maple notation either. With the
> Mathematica notation it is tota
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:53 AM, Rado wrote:
> While googling around I found this: http://groups.google.com/group/canvas-3d
> along with http://www.c3dl.org/ which actually looks just as promising
> as the google's solution.
The problem with both of those is that they both require extensions
and
Cool, its a 3d engine written from scratch in js (as the author says
it has nothing to do with web2py). It runs fine on my firefox 3.5b4 in
ubuntu jaunty. However, o3d uses hardware acceleration while
processing.js (which only a bit more than a parser from java->js)
doesn't so I expect it can't ha
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:14 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Surprisingly enough, Firefox 3.5 does worse thatn Firefox 3.0 on my
> Ubuntu Jaunty (it is about the same choppy and it reacts in weird way
> on the mouse). I am having some development version of Firefox 3.5, so
> it may improve in the future
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
>>>
>>> http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
>>>
>>> although
On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
>>
>> http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
>>
>> although it also uses web2py. I thought it was interesting
>> given the var
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
>>
>> http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
>>
>> although it also uses web2py. I thought it was interesting
>> given the var
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
>
> http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
>
> although it also uses web2py. I thought it was interesting
> given the various problems with jmol at times.
Wow, this is impressive. It wo
Hi,
I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
although it also uses web2py. I thought it was interesting
given the various problems with jmol at times.
Cheers,
Tim.
---
Tim Lahey
PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering
University of Waterloo
ht
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 at 12:06PM -0700, Tom Boothby wrote:
> I attempted to last night, and it (as you can tell) went badly. I
> intended to fix it this morning.
I noticed this problem and described a solution at [1], but of course
trac tickets are a bad place for system administration discussion.
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:20 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> So the conclusion is that we will go with the Mathematica style notation.
>
> Does that also apply to Golam's earlier comment
>
> (a) If we all agree that there is no ambiguity when the particular
> argument is a "symbolic variab
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>> Also, there are probably lots of modules and classes where an
>> alphabetical listing is way better than the one they are in in the
>> code since the alphabetical is at least consistent and predictable.
>
> I think that alphabetical is pr
> Also, there are probably lots of modules and classes where an
> alphabetical listing is way better than the one they are in in the
> code since the alphabetical is at least consistent and predictable.
I think that alphabetical is probably the simplest option. This
suggests that module level
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
>> Something I have asked on this list more than once, without ever
>> getting an answer!
>
> Mike Hansen, ahem? ;-)
Sphinx does this by introspection so it needs to come up with some
order on the methods. If you want something done based
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Dorian Raymer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
[...]
>> Thanks for thorough explanations.
>>
>> I have a question --- why don't you run the frontend on the app engine
>> as well? That way, you don't need any servers and just leave
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Alex Clemesha wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> You can't run Sage on the Google Ap Engine.
> >>> >
> >>> > Couldn't you have a Google App Engine application call the simple
> http
> >>> > api to make some
On Jun 16, 4:56 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Do you also get the same/similar errors if you build Sage 4.0.1 from
> source? It looks like you were trying to build version 3.4.
>
> --
> Regards
> Minh Van Nguyen
I downloaded 3.4 because it was the most recent source version from
the Boston mirror. R
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> This looks to me like your system was overloaded or something (just a
> guess). But can you give some information about your hardware, like
> CPU speed, etc.
>
Would it not be sensible for Sage to at least give an option of
continuing if ATLAS can't be optimized? The fact
> Something I have asked on this list more than once, without ever
> getting an answer!
Mike Hansen, ahem? ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubs
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:36 AM, bparkis wrote:
>
>> This looks to me like your system was overloaded or something (just a
>> guess). But can you give some information about your hardware, like
>> CPU speed, etc.
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Minh Van Nguyen
>
> Intel core duo, dual core 1.83 Ghz, cac
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> 2009/6/16 Robert Miller :
>>
>> It seems that when I rest-ify a module using Sage, it alphabetizes the
>> functions under a class, and the classes and functions within the
>> module, even if I've ordered the functions more logically than
>>
On Jun 16, 4:15 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, bparkis wrote:
>
> > I'm on Ubuntu-8.04 on an i386 Macbook using KDE. Kernel is 2.6.24-21-
> > server.
>
> > The install log is 45 megs, so here's just the last stage where it
> > failed:
>
> > STAGE 2-4-5:
2009/6/16 Robert Miller :
>
> It seems that when I rest-ify a module using Sage, it alphabetizes the
> functions under a class, and the classes and functions within the
> module, even if I've ordered the functions more logically than
> alphabetical. Is there a way to turn this off?
Something I ha
It seems that when I rest-ify a module using Sage, it alphabetizes the
functions under a class, and the classes and functions within the
module, even if I've ordered the functions more logically than
alphabetical. Is there a way to turn this off?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, bparkis wrote:
>
> I'm on Ubuntu-8.04 on an i386 Macbook using KDE. Kernel is 2.6.24-21-
> server.
>
> The install log is 45 megs, so here's just the last stage where it
> failed:
>
> STAGE 2-4-5: GEMV TUNE
> make -f Makefile INSTALL_LOG/cMVRES pre=c 2>&1 |
Hi sage-devel,
usually I use
export MAKE='make -j2'
and then MAKE to build Sage versions on my MacIntel Core2Duo. For Sage
4.0.2.rc0 I noticed the following problem, which does not seem to be
related to the specific Sage version. First I had a strange doctest
failure not reported by anybody els
I'm on Ubuntu-8.04 on an i386 Macbook using KDE. Kernel is 2.6.24-21-
server.
The install log is 45 megs, so here's just the last stage where it
failed:
STAGE 2-4-5: GEMV TUNE
make -f Makefile INSTALL_LOG/cMVRES pre=c 2>&1 | ./xatlas_tee
INSTALL_LOG/cMVTUNE.LOG
make[3]: *** [build] Error 255
> As Nick noted, I accidentally did sage -sdist sage-... instead of just
> using the version number at the end; for anyone working on a release
> in the future, just a tip -- that doesn't work too well. ;)
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6338
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~
I attempted to last night, and it (as you can tell) went badly. I
intended to fix it this morning.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:21 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> I noticed someone installed 'hg' yesterday on t2.
>
> Cool. I have no id
On 16-Jun-09, at 11:57 AM, Tom Boothby wrote:
>
> Recently, I've been doing multi-day computations with the notebook,
> and I've been annoyed about the very poor support for such a thing.
> One of my biggest gripes is that we don't have an easy-to-use progress
> meter. Perhaps one could make a
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
>
> Recently, I've been doing multi-day computations with the notebook,
> and I've been annoyed about the very poor support for such a thing.
> One of my biggest gripes is that we don't have an easy-to-use progress
> meter. Perhaps one could mak
Recently, I've been doing multi-day computations with the notebook,
and I've been annoyed about the very poor support for such a thing.
One of my biggest gripes is that we don't have an easy-to-use progress
meter. Perhaps one could make a twitter account for their notebook,
and subscribe to the R
> No, it is not deliberate. There is now an rc2 with this fixed an some other
> things fixed:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.0.2.rc2.tar
>
> Craig just made the above, by the way.
>
Actually, this isn't going to be the final rc2 -- I had added a
handful of fixes,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:31 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sage-Devel,
>>
>> Should we be using "twitter" for something?
>
> I'm not sure if that will catch on. I've created the Sage Math
> LinkedIn group a few weeks ago
>
> http://www.li
Hi kcrisman,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:07 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>> The release note for Sage 3.0.3 is already up at
>>
>> http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/sage-3.0.3.txt
>>
>> Michael Abshoff also copied it to sage-announce at:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-announce/browse_threa
John Cremona wrote:
> On rc2 64-bit I get one failure:
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/banner.py"
>
Same here on Fedora 10, 32 bit
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> I noticed someone installed 'hg' yesterday on t2.
Cool. I have no idea who did that yesterday. I kind of thought I did
that a few months ago.
> Is this to be expected?
No.
>
> kir...@t2:[~] $ hg
> abort: couldn't find mercurial lib
I noticed someone installed 'hg' yesterday on t2.
Is this to be expected?
kir...@t2:[~] $ hg
abort: couldn't find mercurial libraries in [/usr/local/bin
/usr/lib/python24.zip /usr/lib/python2.4 /usr/lib/python2.4/plat-sunos5
/usr/lib/python2.4/lib-tk /usr/lib/python2.4/lib-dynload
/usr/lib/py
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:20 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> So the conclusion is that we will go with the Mathematica style notation.
>
> Does that also apply to Golam's earlier comment
>
> (a) If we all agree that there is no ambiguity when the particular
> argument is a "symbolic variable" or
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> Tristram Scott wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> I might be interested in working on this, but only if there is a chance
>> that it will be possible to get it to compile using the SunStudio
>> compilers. I see that at the moment the only work be
> The release note for Sage 3.0.3 is already up at
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/sage-3.0.3.txt
>
> Michael Abshoff also copied it to sage-announce at:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-announce/browse_thread/thread/853...
Like I said, I saw it before... but it's not included in
Hi kcrisman,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:12 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> By the way, the release notes for 3.0.3 never happened, but they do
> exist (somewhere) on sage-devel if you go through them enough (as I
> had to once), so if you are looking for something to occupy a half-
> hour (!) you could
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:19:49PM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 3:03 am, William Stein wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity what computes the layout of the graph? Does
> > Sage give the vertex positions, then tikz takes care of the *text
> > labels* and edge positions? Or can tikz actua
On 16-Jun-09, at 7:27 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On rc2 64-bit I get one failure:
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/banner.py"
Just a guess: sage -sdist was tagged with sage-4.0.2.rc2 instead of
just 4.0.2.rc2.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this grou
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 05:14:43PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
> Is there any way to get a copy of mupad on sage.math. There is a Sage
> <--> Mupad interface,
> but mupad isn't on sage.math, so it is impossible to test. Any code
> that I can't possibly test,
> I will eventually remove from Sage
Tristram Scott wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I might be interested in working on this, but only if there is a chance
> that it will be possible to get it to compile using the SunStudio
> compilers. I see that at the moment the only work being done is under gcc.
>
> Anyway, I have sun hardware, rangin
> So the conclusion is that we will go with the Mathematica style notation.
Does that also apply to Golam's earlier comment
(a) If we all agree that there is no ambiguity when the particular
argument is a "symbolic variable" or "symbolic function" then
we should typeset them a
> The file HISTORY.txt has been updated with releases up to and
> including Sage 4.0.1. It has been uploaded to the Sage website, and is
> available at
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/HISTORY.txt
>
About time that happened, though it was a bear to do, I'm sure - great
work, Minh!
By t
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Henryk
Trappmann wrote:
>
> sage: version()
> 'Sage Version 4.0.1, Release Date: 2009-06-06'
> sage: var('a d')
> (a, d)
> sage: A = matrix([[a,0],[1,d]])
> sage: A.eigenvalues()
> [d, a]
> sage: A.jordan_form()
> ---
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:31 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sage-Devel,
>>
>> Should we be using "twitter" for something?
>
> I'm not sure if that will catch on. I've created the Sage Math
> LinkedIn group a few weeks ago
>
> http://www.li
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.0.1, Release Date: 2009-06-06'
sage: var('a d')
(a, d)
sage: A = matrix([[a,0],[1,d]])
sage: A.eigenvalues()
[d, a]
sage: A.jordan_form()
---
RuntimeError Traceback
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:31 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> Should we be using "twitter" for something?
I'm not sure if that will catch on. I've created the Sage Math
LinkedIn group a few weeks ago
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2010654
So far there's only 11 members, only
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Golam Mortuza
> Hossain wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>>> There were long discussion about the typesetting of partial derivatives
>>> in the new system, but I do
Hi Sage-Devel,
Should we be using "twitter" for something?
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscr
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> While searching around, I found that the release tours on the wiki
> sometimes link to a nonexistent release note: in
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.4.2 the link to
> http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/sage-3.4.2.txt is broken.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:11 PM, John Cremona wrote:
> I'm testing this now. It seems that putting "..." into the expected
> output does not work when it is at the beginiing of the output, which
> is annoying.
>
> Can you tell me how to uninstall a spkg? Now that I have installed it
> in my 4.0.
There is a simplex method implemented in scipy.optimize, I think its
the default for the function fmin (see
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/tutorial/optimize.html
for instance).
On the other hand, the scipy functions are very float-oriented, so if
your implementation could handle more
hello all,
i'm just giving a try to the binaries found on the website and it
doesn't work:
nemo-henry% /local/apps/sage-3.4.2-i86pc-SunOS+toolchain/sage
--
| Sage Version 3.4.2, Release Date: 2009-05-04 |
|
I'm working on a very fast implementation of the
Nelder-Mead algorithm for optimizing functions.
This is a particularly good algorithm if the
function is noisy, or is not smooth.
Is it in SAGE already? If not, I'd be happy to
release my code to SAGE under the whatever license
once it is debugged
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dr. David
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>> The fix suggested by Clint to allow ATLAS to build (namely making
>>> GuessSmallNB return 28) does indeed allow ATLAS to build.
>>>
>>> I could crat
William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>> The fix suggested by Clint to allow ATLAS to build (namely making
>> GuessSmallNB return 28) does indeed allow ATLAS to build.
>>
>> I could crate a patch file for that, which is only applied on Solaris,
>> but c
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all
>>> optional spkg's into it. All official optional spkg's do install fine
>>> o
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all
>> optional spkg's into it. All official optional spkg's do install fine
>> on sage.math. Also, on sage.math, all reasonable optional commerci
Hi,
Is there any way to get a copy of mupad on sage.math. There is a Sage
<--> Mupad interface,
but mupad isn't on sage.math, so it is impossible to test. Any code
that I can't possibly test,
I will eventually remove from Sage so that I can make all tests pass,
even with the --optional
option.
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all
> optional spkg's into it. All official optional spkg's do install fine
> on sage.math. Also, on sage.math, all reasonable optional commercial
> math software is also installed (I even have a legal ma
Hi,
On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all
optional spkg's into it. All official optional spkg's do install fine
on sage.math. Also, on sage.math, all reasonable optional commercial
math software is also installed (I even have a legal magma in my home
directory). I th
On rc2 64-bit I get one failure:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/banner.py"
Here's the detail:
**
File "/home/jec/sage-4.0.2.rc2/devel/sage/sage/misc/banner.py", line 125:
sage: print "Sage major version is %s" % version_dict
Both David Joyner's and Jaap's test failures are the ones Craig and I
fixed earlier today at #6303, so that should go away when the second
patch there is merged. People might want to try applying it
themselves.
John
2009/6/16 Jaap Spies :
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've created sage-
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created sage-4.0.2.rc1 which is here:
>
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/release/4.0.2/rc1/sage-4.0.2.rc1/dist/sage-4.0.2.rc1.tar
>
> You can upgrade by doing
>
> sage -upgrade
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/release/4.0.2/r
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Alex Clemesha wrote:
>
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >> You can't run Sage on the Google Ap Engine.
>>> >
>>> > Couldn't you have a Google App Engine application call the simple http
>>> > api to make some public notebook somewhere perform calculations? I'm
>>> > thinking of som
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloeffler
>> wrote:
>>> I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
>>> rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is this deliberate?
>>
>> No, it i
4.0.2.rc1 installed fine (updating from 4.0.2.rc0) but had exactly one failure
in sage -testall on a 10.4 intel macbook:
zeus:~/sagefiles/sage-4.0.2.rc0 davidjoyner$ ./sage -t
"devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_e
+1 for including this function... I had made the same one, but mine is
actually 5 times slower than the one proposed in trac 6245 :P
Is it possible to not name it "hadamard_product"? Coming from MatLab,
I've used it hundreds of time, but I would have never recognized that
"hadamard_product" could
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloeffler
> wrote:
>> I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
>> rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is this deliberate?
>
> No, it is not deliberate. There is now an rc2 with this fixed an so
One of the remaining failures in rc1 was fixed by the patch at #6303
which does not seem to have been merged yet (Craig Citro and I fixed
it earlier today). If that is right, there may still be failures with
rc2, but we were a bit confused about whether the second patch there
was necessary or not
2009/6/16 William Stein :
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:11 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> 2009/6/16 davidloeffler :
>>>
>>> Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
>>>
>>> On Jun 16, 12:34 pm, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloeffler
wrote:
> I notice
2009/6/16 davidloeffler :
>
> Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
That's what happens when you have a tag team.
As soon as somebody volunteers to be release manager for Sage-4.0.3,
or we could start that release cycle. (See the sage-release post I
made earlier today.)
William
>
> On Jun 16,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:11 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> 2009/6/16 davidloeffler :
>>
>> Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
>>
>> On Jun 16, 12:34 pm, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloeffler
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spk
2009/6/16 davidloeffler :
>
> Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
>
> On Jun 16, 12:34 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloeffler
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
>> > rather than malb's updated libm4ri-200906
Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
On Jun 16, 12:34 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloeffler
> wrote:
>
> > I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
> > rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is this deliberate?
>
> No, i
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloeffler wrote:
>
> I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
> rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is this deliberate?
No, it is not deliberate. There is now an rc2 with this fixed an some other
things fixed:
http:/
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
>> I was looking through the "tasks" on the trac server, and noticed #6056:
>> the HISTORY.txt is now very outdated. Also, nothing has been sent to
>> sage-announce since Februar
>
>> >>
>> >> You can't run Sage on the Google Ap Engine.
>> >
>> > Couldn't you have a Google App Engine application call the simple http
>> > api to make some public notebook somewhere perform calculations? I'm
>> > thinking of something like the remote sagetex that Dan announced the
>> > other
I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is this deliberate?
The former failed to build for lots of people (including me).
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> I was looking through the "tasks" on the trac server, and noticed #6056:
> the HISTORY.txt is now very outdated. Also, nothing has been sent to
> sage-announce since February.
I've tried sending release announcements to sage-announce b
Hi David,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:57 PM, davidloeffler wrote:
>
> I actually got an error (rather than a warning) from the docstring for
> elliptic curve period lattices -- a typo, "\signa", had confused
> LaTeX.
This has been fixed at #6297. It has positive review, but not yet merged.
--
2009/6/16 davidloeffler :
>
>
>
> On Jun 16, 2:15 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> On 15-Jun-09, at 4:22 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>> > "Someone didn't format their reST correctly, so building the reference
>> > manual now produces warnings/errors."
>>
>> Has the reference manual ever built co
On Jun 16, 2:15 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 15-Jun-09, at 4:22 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> > "Someone didn't format their reST correctly, so building the reference
> > manual now produces warnings/errors."
>
> Has the reference manual ever built correctly? (I always get tons of
> noi
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:59 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
> >
> > William Stein wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, David Joyner
> wrote:
> >>> Excellent!
> >>>
> >>> Once/if you get Sage running on it, will students of mine (<100 to
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> I was looking through the "tasks" on the trac server, and noticed #6056:
> the HISTORY.txt is now very outdated. Also, nothing has been sent to
> sage-announce since February.
>
> While searching around, I found that the release tours on the wiki
2009/6/15 William Stein :
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:33 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> Does the release of an rc0 mean that 4.0.2 is closed to new patches?
>
> Yes, I think it does. But don't worry 4.0.3 is only moments away :-).
I know -- you wait a month for a new release and then three come
94 matches
Mail list logo
