On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:19 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Personally, I prefer the Mathematica notation because I can actually
> read it. I have (serious!) trouble reading the current notation that
> Sage uses and I can barely read the Maple notation either. With the
> Mathematica notation it is totally completely obvious to me what is
> going on.
If it wasn't obvious from my previous comments in former threads, I
am of this opinion as well. I would actually be for disallowing the
bare function('f') from the global namespace altogether and forcing
the user to provide named, ordered dummy variables (what does it
actually mean?)
- Robert
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
