> So the conclusion is that we will go with the Mathematica style notation.
Does that also apply to Golam's earlier comment
(a) If we all agree that there is no ambiguity when the particular
argument is a "symbolic variable" or "symbolic function" then
we should typeset them as those found in text-books.
Ex:
(1) D[0,0,0] (f)(x,y) => \frac{\partial^3}{\partial x^3} f
(x,y)
(2) D[0] (f)(g(x,y), h(z)) => \frac{\partial}{\partial
g(x,y)} f(g(x,y), h(y))
so that we will no longer see nicely typeset partial derivatives even
in case (a)(1) (or even Leibniz notation at all?), or is it only in
the case (b) "when the argument is an expression"? Thanks for the
clarification.
- kcrisman
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
