On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Dorian Raymer<deldo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
[...]
>> Thanks for thorough explanations.
>>
>> I have a question --- why don't you run the frontend on the app engine
>> as well? That way, you don't need any servers and just leave
>> everything to Google to handle.
>
> In short, you can't run Twisted on App Engine, so the codenode frontend is
> not usable without significant extra adaption work. Also, vendor lock-in
> with google is something we would like to avoid.
>
> That is not to say a notebook project specifically for App Engine is a bad
> idea. As you pointed out, Ondrej, a pure App Engine Notebook would be a
> completely free source of computation power, but for us, it is not something
> we have time to focus on right now.

I see.  I didn't suggest to be vendor locked though, as it is possible
to write for example a django app, that works both in and out of the
google app engine, for more info see for example:

http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/pure_django.html

Ondrej

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to