Hi!
There's going to be a surprise Sage Days at MSRI this March 2009 on
Algebraic Geometry. See
http://www.msri.org/calendar/workshops/WorkshopInfo/502/show_workshop
for the preliminary web page. Funding is available.
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
Univers
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Georg,
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Georg Muntingh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Minh,
>>
>> Why don't you add your Sage-related blog posts to Planet Sage,
>> http://planet.sagemath.org/ ?
>
> OK, I admit
Hi Georg,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Georg Muntingh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Minh,
>
> Why don't you add your Sage-related blog posts to Planet Sage,
> http://planet.sagemath.org/ ?
OK, I admit it: I'm too lazy to shamelessly promote myself :-)
I've known about
http://planet.sagem
On Oct 28, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:22 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Georg S. Weber
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> having thought about it a bit more, I suddenly reali
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:22 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Georg S. Weber
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> having thought about it a bit more, I suddenly realized that I came to
>> like this ".spkg" extension.
>> That's pure
On Oct 28, 2008, at 6:16 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> Forwarded. (It was sent to the wrong list.)
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:34 PM
> Subject: [SAGEdev] calling python from lisp
> To:
> Cc: sage-devel <[EMAIL
Forwarded. (It was sent to the wrong list.)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:34 PM
Subject: [SAGEdev] calling python from lisp
To:
Cc: sage-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an articl
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:19 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> Thx, and very cool ;)
>> Yes, sure, promote what you can, that's the reason for doing such a
>> graphic. If you want a version with colors, i can hurry a bit - or if
>> you need it in another size, tell me the measuremen
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 at 10:41AM -0700, Tim Abbott wrote:
> The issue with tar is not on whether tar -xf foo.spkg works, but
> whether tar -xf sage_scripts will complete the remainder of the
> filename.
I'm a bit confused with your arguments: I understand the parts about
automated software tools nee
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Georg S. Weber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
> having thought about it a bit more, I suddenly realized that I came to
> like this ".spkg" extension.
> That's purely emotional, of course.
> But I'd surely miss it.
Since this is a question about user
Hi, I'm new to sage development and have a few problems getting into
it.
As a start and to get better known to the code I wanted to implement
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4069 in the following way:
1. After login check if gears is installed
2. Store this, if so
3. Next time when the
sonium wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to sage development and have a few problems getting into
> it.
>
> As a start and to get better known to the code I wanted to implement
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4069 in the following way:
>
> 1. After login check if gears is installed
> 2. Store thi
How far away is the eMPIRe spkg? Isn't it about time we got that up?
It should resolve a number of issues.
Bill.
On 27 Oct, 18:57, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 27, 11:47 am, mcelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Forgot to mention it is SAGE 3.1.4
>
> > On Oct 27, 11:44 am, mcel
Hi, all,
I just ran into something weird, on Mac OS X using Terminal and sage.
I pasted about 16 lines of sage code into Terminal, and it got really
confused. The "echoed" character strings began to look like
recursively escalating repeats of part of the last string:
g3 = MS(eval(str(GG.
Hey guys,
having thought about it a bit more, I suddenly realized that I came to
like this ".spkg" extension.
That's purely emotional, of course.
But I'd surely miss it.
(I heartily dislike that kind of superfluous ".spyx" extension, by the
way, but that's another topic.)
So -1 to my own propos
On Oct 28, 12:51 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:10 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 28, 8:55 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > On Oct 27
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:10 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 28, 8:55 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > On Oct 27, 11:42 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:41 , Tim Abbott wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 28, 1:07 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> For example "tar tf foo.spkg" works just fine on Mac OS X (10.5); and
>>> as Robert noted,
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:03 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 28, 10:58 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:41 , Tim Abbott wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 1:07 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example "tar tf foo.spkg" works just fine on Mac OS X
Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Sage subshell$ ipython -Version
> 0.8.2
>
> But still
>
> Sage subshell$ sage -ipython -Version
> 0.8.4
>
sage: from enthought.mayavi.tools import mlab as M
!! enthought.mayavi.tools.mlab is obsolete and has been replaced by !!
!! enthought.mayavi.mlab. Please update yo
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:03 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 28, 10:58 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:41 , Tim Abbott wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 1:07 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example "tar tf foo.spkg" works just fine on Mac OS X
mabshoff wrote:
>
> But in the end I agree with you on the "-1" on the proposed name
> change. It is much less work to add instructions to the manual on how
> to add association/completion for popular tools than changing the name
> of the spkg extenion.
>
I couldn't agree more!
Jaap
--~--~
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> Waldek Hebisch writes:
>
>> Martin Rubey wrote:
>> >
>> > Waldek Hebisch writes:
>> >
>> > > 2) I think we have all tools to do actual computations: we can
>>> > factorise in algebraic extensions, so we can verify irreducibility
>>> >
On Oct 28, 10:58 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:41 , Tim Abbott wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 28, 1:07 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> For example "tar tf foo.spkg" works just fine on Mac OS X (10.5); and
> >> as Robert noted, you can
On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:41 , Tim Abbott wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 1:07 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For example "tar tf foo.spkg" works just fine on Mac OS X (10.5); and
>> as Robert noted, you can teach the Finder with the Get-Info trick.
>
> The issue with tar is not on whet
On Oct 28, 1:07 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example "tar tf foo.spkg" works just fine on Mac OS X (10.5); and
> as Robert noted, you can teach the Finder with the Get-Info trick.
The issue with tar is not on whether tar -xf foo.spkg works, but
whether tar -xf sage_sc
On Oct 28, 2008, at 04:03 , Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 11:09 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - The background buckyball seems distracting to me.
>>How does it look without that?
>
> It was boring without it, that's the reason why I introduced it in the
> first
mabshoff wrote:
> Hi Jaap.
>
> (a) in 3.1.3 we updated ipython (#3659) - but there is already a
> ipython 0.9.x is out there.
> (b) in 3.1.4 we fixed some ipython startup issues - see #4291
>
> Maybe you should try downgrading ipython? If that fixes it we have a
> clear culprit :)
>
I tried
On Oct 28, 2008, at 00:45 , Georg S. Weber wrote:
> often I'd like to "just have a quick look" into a spkg.
> Then I copy it, rename it, tell Mac OS X that YES, I do want to rename
> it,
> and then I can open it with a mouse click, and change into the created
> directory.
> Finally I am able to
On Oct 28, 2008, at 09:26 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 28, 8:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have opened a ticket (#4377) for this.
>
> Justin,
>
> note that William and I fixed the issue. The patch has been merged in
> alpha2.
Great! Thanks. I'll try it out.
Justin
--
Justin
On Oct 28, 8:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can reproduce this when I set MAKE to "make -j2" and run a "sage -b"
> after touching some pyx file:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "setup.py", line 1545, in
> cython(deps, ext_modules)
> File "setup.py", line
On Oct 28, 9:17 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With experimental package mayavi_2.2.1 installed the following works fine:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-3.1.2]$ ./sage -wthread
> --
> | SAGE Version 3.1.2, Release Date:
With experimental package mayavi_2.2.1 installed the following works fine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-3.1.2]$ ./sage -wthread
--
| SAGE Version 3.1.2, Release Date: 2008-09-16 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, an
On Oct 28, 8:58 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:26 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is an excellent idea. Obviously, for every package Sage
> > includes, as much of its functionality as possible should be made
> > available ! But
On Oct 28, 8:55 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 27, 11:42 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> > We had a vote on this a month or two back and then then consensus was
> >> >
My c++ L-function package has a general L-function class and library of
functions.
Given basic data for the L-function (Dirichlet series coefficients and
functional equation) it can compute the function.
The command line interface, lcalc, has some basic built in types of L-functions
(including
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:26 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is an excellent idea. Obviously, for every package Sage
> includes, as much of its functionality as possible should be made
> available ! But this does take time and effort.
>
> I am CC-ing this to sage-nt since if
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 27, 11:42 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> > We had a vote on this a month or two back and then then consensus was
>> > not to include gp2c per default. I agree that the patch should be
>> >
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FYI, for just today (Tuesday, 28 Oct), apparently Codeweavers is
> offering their Crossover Wine-based plugin (letting you run windows
> applications under their modified Wine on Linux or Mac) for free. See
> http://down.
On Oct 28, 4:32 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2:15 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
[snip]
> > I can't quite put my finger on why I have a
> > strong reaction, but I think it's because
> > "sage-3.2.alpha.spkg1.tar.bz2" is harder to (visually) parse, an
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Oct 28, 3:10 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It looks great! It's by my office door now. We will be having a
>> conference that features an introduction to Sage in about two weeks; can
>> I use this as a promotional flyer?
>
> Thx, and very cool ;)
> Yes
On Oct 28, 12:14 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 23:59 , Georg S. Weber wrote:
Hi,
> > on my Intel Core2 Duo Mac OS X 10.4.11 / Xcode2.5 box Sage 3.2.alpha1
> > built fine
> > (building it I was using just the plain normal "make" command, no
> > substitu
On Oct 28, 7:32 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1 on the rename, too. It will cause massive problems without any
> serious benefit whatsoever. The manual clearly describes what an spkg
> is and provides tools to create them and so on. If one wants to play
> with the innards of Sage and
> On Oct 28, 6:28 am, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>> > Tag 1.0.4 release.
>>
>
>> maybe the .spkg should also change its version number. I still have
>> no clue where the standard place for the fricas.spkg is. Is there a
>> link on the Axiom-Wiki?
>
??? The "standard place" for the fricas-xxx.spkg is on
FYI, for just today (Tuesday, 28 Oct), apparently Codeweavers is
offering their Crossover Wine-based plugin (letting you run windows
applications under their modified Wine on Linux or Mac) for free. See
http://down.codeweavers.com/
See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codeweavers for apparen
On Oct 28, 7:16 am, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 3:10 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It looks great! It's by my office door now. We will be having a
> > conference that features an introduction to Sage in about two weeks; can
> > I use this as a prom
On Oct 28, 3:10 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks great! It's by my office door now. We will be having a
> conference that features an introduction to Sage in about two weeks; can
> I use this as a promotional flyer?
Thx, and very cool ;)
Yes, sure, promote what you can, tha
On Oct 28, 6:30 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though I'm in favor of making things easier for the debian
> process (both (a) to add more Sage users and (b) in the perhaps
> wildly overly optimistic hope that one day Canonical will support Sage
> somehow), I wonder if it is possib
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Oct 23, 11:09 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - The background buckyball seems distracting to me.
>> How does it look without that?
>
> It was boring without it, that's the reason why I introduced it in the
> first place ;)
> Contrasts are cha
Minh,
Why don't you add your Sage-related blog posts to Planet Sage,
http://planet.sagemath.org/ ?
Georg
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
One good reason for using the 2.4.x version of pari (and not the 2.3.x stable
branch) [although this might be bad for gp2c) is that the 2.4.x has some
functions that are not present in the stable branch.
For instance, it has a function polhermite that computes the Hermite
polynomials that seem
I think that it would be important to change the extension to .tar.bz2
so that the sage packages get recognized by standard systems tools.
(For instance, try to open a spkg with a filemanager like midnight
commander...)
May be we can change
foo.spkg
to
foo.spkg.tar.bz2
This way the package
On Oct 27, 11:59 pm, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I noted one other defect of Sage3.2.alpha1, which seems to have been
> there for quite a time.
> Change again into devel/sage, then do "hg verify", and we're informed
> of an integrity error:
>
> susanne-webers-computer:~/Publ
On Oct 28, 2:15 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 12:45 AM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > often I'd like to "just have a quick look" into a spkg.
> > Then I copy it, rename it, tell Mac OS X that YES, I do want to rename
> > it,
> > and then I can open
On Oct 27, 11:42 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We had a vote on this a month or two back and then then consensus was
> > not to include gp2c per default. I agree that the patch should be
> > merged, though.
>
> Yes, that's what happened.
>
> I think the better way for gp2
On Oct 23, 11:09 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - The background buckyball seems distracting to me.
> How does it look without that?
It was boring without it, that's the reason why I introduced it in the
first place ;)
Contrasts are changed in a way, that it is always r
Though I'm in favor of making things easier for the debian
process (both (a) to add more Sage users and (b) in the perhaps
wildly overly optimistic hope that one day Canonical will support Sage
somehow), I wonder if it is possible for someone sufficiently
skillful to write a script which crawls th
2008/10/28 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 7:21 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 27, 7:17 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Since this requires a C compiler in order to work anyway, it seems
>>> like it
This is an excellent idea. Obviously, for every package Sage
includes, as much of its functionality as possible should be made
available ! But this does take time and effort.
I am CC-ing this to sage-nt since if we are going to discuss how to do
this in detail that might be the best forum.
Joh
On Oct 28, 2008, at 12:45 AM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> often I'd like to "just have a quick look" into a spkg.
> Then I copy it, rename it, tell Mac OS X that YES, I do want to rename
> it,
> and then I can open it with a mouse click, and change into the created
> directory.
> Finally I am
Hi,
often I'd like to "just have a quick look" into a spkg.
Then I copy it, rename it, tell Mac OS X that YES, I do want to rename
it,
and then I can open it with a mouse click, and change into the created
directory.
Finally I am able to scan the contents.
It would be nice to be quicker, and with
On Oct 27, 2008, at 23:59 , Georg S. Weber wrote:
> On 28 Okt., 02:53, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, Michael,
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2008, at 18:39 , mabshoff wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 27, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 26, 2008, at 11:09 PM, mabsho
62 matches
Mail list logo
