On Oct 27, 11:42 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<SNIP>
> > We had a vote on this a month or two back and then then consensus was
> > not to include gp2c per default. I agree that the patch should be
> > merged, though.
>
> Yes, that's what happened.
>
> I think the better way for gp2c to get into sage is for it to be
> standard in pari itself. Then it will automatically be in Sage.
> Have you proposed that it be included standard in pari yet?
>
> By the way, Karim Belebas told me numerous times that Sage
> should use the latest snapshot version of pari instead of the
> stable version we use now.
I did build a pari-2.4.3.spkg at SD 10 and while gen.pyx passes
doctests there were problems with the gp doctests. I did take some
notes about which patches no longer applied and which patches had been
merged, so if anyone wants to try his/her luck let me know.
> -- William
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
