>
> Both fixed in:
>
> /home/malb/pkgs/singular-3-0-2-20070507-0123.spkg
>
> IIRC Nick reported that the libsingular stuff works on OSX/PPC for him, so
> this spkg should _build_ on all SAGE supported platforms. Reports are very
> welcome. I think there is an issue when importing (to SAGE) libs
On May 7, 7:45 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/6/07, cwitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > I've posted sage-2.5.alpha3 here:
>
> > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage2.5/
>
> > > Feedback is welcome.
>
> > On my machine running Debian testing, plottin
On 5/6/07, cwitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've posted sage-2.5.alpha3 here:
> >
> >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage2.5/
> >
> > Feedback is welcome.
>
> On my machine running Debian testing, plotting-related tests fail with
> messages like:
>
> libpng error: Incompatible li
On May 6, 9:24 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've posted sage-2.5.alpha3 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage2.5/
>
> Feedback is welcome.
On my machine running Debian testing, plotting-related tests fail with
messages like:
libpng error: Incom
All tests pass on my machine, a Centrino running ubuntu feisty:
didier
On 5/6/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've posted sage-2.5.alpha3 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage2.5/
>
> Feedback is welcome. This still won't build on OS X PowerPC o
Hi sage-devel,
Eventually I got alpha2 to build on PPC.
Martin Albrecht and I discussed several small fixes to get Singular
and libsingular building on OS X; most of those are in his package.
I also needed this to build:
export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/Users/nalexand/sage/local/lib ; ./gentable
I h
On Sunday 06 May 2007 23:29, mabshoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Latest package is at
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/pkgs/singular-3-0-2-20070506-2226
>.spkg
>
> There are two small problem: There are some garbage characters at line
> 2 in Singular/Makefile.in
On Sunday 06 May 2007 4:14 pm, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> I'm completely sorry. This is related to a fixed body with to center
> the content-body. I won't be using it.
There are over 130 subscribers to sage-devel. You're posting way
too much to the list right now. Email Justin directly, etc.
I'm completely sorry. This is related to a fixed body with to center
the content-body. I won't be using it.
On 5/6/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 15:45 , Timothy Clemans wrote:
>
> >
> > Oh so it is not resizing correctly. Thank you for the screenshot. I
>
Hello,
> To be clear, it's the way the 'a' and 'g' are joined, together with
> the 'type face', that makes for a complex visual experience (:-}), at
> least for me. I think the idea can be maintained, if the visual
> aspect is modified slightly. But again, since I'm a part-time
> engineer with
On May 6, 2007, at 14:35 , Timothy Clemans wrote:
>
> The two column navigation table is very confusing to me.
A lot of this discussion is about aesthetics, for which there are no
easy answers when reasonable men agree to bicker :-} For me, the
table is not confusing at all.
> I think tha
On Sunday 06 May 2007 3:49 pm, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> > I agree. I actually changed it back already (try "refresh" in your
> > browser).
>
> Much better :-}
>
> A point I meant to bring up earlier, and forgot (Tim's site reminded
> me): do you want to keep SAGE as an acronym, or let it stand
On May 6, 2007, at 15:20 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On 5/6/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On May 6, 2007, at 13:57 , William Stein wrote:
> I agree. I actually changed it back already (try "refresh" in your
> browser).
Much better :-}
A point I meant to bring up earlier,
Oh so it is not resizing correctly. Thank you for the screenshot. I
had no idea that this sort of thing happened and it does happen for
me. Can you make a screenshot of William's design for me?
On 5/6/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 14:38 , Timothy Clemans w
On 5/6/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 6, 2007, at 13:57 , William Stein wrote:
> The rest may be fussing with details, but, being part engineer,
> fussing comes naturally:
Thanks. :-)
>- I think putting the "Download/.." box above the sage logo and
> tag doesn
On 5/6/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The two column navigation table is very confusing to me.
This might be a valid point. It's definitely not done very often.
I think that
> web design has taken over content, which is pretty sad.
Huh?
The Sympy,
> Octave, and GMP site
Can you make a screenshot of my version in Safari. I only have IE and Firefox.
On 5/6/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 24:37 , William Stein wrote:
> [snip]
> > (1) do the pages look:
> > -- visually appealing
> > -- simple and clean
> > --
On May 6, 9:39 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > I've posted sage-2.5.alpha3 here:
A couple issues from cygwin from alpha2. I am not sure that the two
build patches I posted today are in alpha3, so I will postpone
building alpha3 until tomorrow.
The two column navigation table is very confusing to me. I think that
web design has taken over content, which is pretty sad. The Sympy,
Octave, and GMP sites are all good, because they provide all a lot of
content in a clean web design. So while you guys don't use lists and
css with them and use
Hello,
Latest package is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/pkgs/singular-3-0-2-20070506-2226.spkg
There are two small problem: There are some garbage characters at line
2 in Singular/Makefile.in. delete those.
Also: change the ix86-Win directive in Singular/Makefile.in to
something
On May 6, 2007, at 13:57 , William Stein wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've significantly modified
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/rc/web/
>
> based on many people's extensive (and greatly
> appreciated!) feedback.
I like it.
The rest may be fussing with details, but, being part enginee
On 5/6/07, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking good. There should be a bit more space above the "Download
> SAGE for ..." heading.
Thanks. Fixed.
> Do we have a vector version of the logo or
> just a larger version that we can scale up so that it's not dominated
> by the text b
Looking good. There should be a bit more space above the "Download
SAGE for ..." heading. Do we have a vector version of the logo or
just a larger version that we can scale up so that it's not dominated
by the text below?
--Mike
On 5/6/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
Hello,
I've significantly modified
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/rc/web/
based on many people's extensive (and greatly
appreciated!) feedback.More feedback would be
appreciated, though I think it's converging, and
I have a lot of papers to grade :-).
William
--~--~-~-
On Sunday 06 May 2007 21:42, Yi Qiang wrote:
> On May 6, 2007, at 10:41 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I like it a lot. I have a few aesthetic complaints:
> >>
> >> 1) Use the logo Alex designed.
>
> I couldn't help myself:
>
>
> http://
I'm starting to agree with some people on this list, maybe the Big Four
links in the middle are simply unnecessary. The menu at the top is
pretty short and sweet. I think people can probably find what they want
there.
BTW the latest iteration is looking pretty gorgeous.
David
--~--~
On May 6, 2007, at 10:41 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I like it a lot. I have a few aesthetic complaints:
>>
>> 1) Use the logo Alex designed.
I couldn't help myself:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/yqiang/media/sage2.5.png
Ch
William Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've posted sage-2.5.alpha3 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage2.5/
>
> Feedback is welcome. This still won't build on OS X PowerPC or
> Cygwin, but should build on Linux and Intel OS X and pass "make test"
> there. Also, it should hav
On May 6, 2007, at 24:37 , William Stein wrote:
[snip]
> (1) do the pages look:
> -- visually appealing
> -- simple and clean
> -- convey all the necessary information (i.e., I'm not missing
> key things that used to be there)
Overall, it looks good. I think it's worth
On May 6, 2007, at 2:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>> One option might be: put the logo where the "SAGE" is now, and then
>> on the next line, instead of
>>
>> Free Open Source Mathematics Software
>>
>> do
>>
>> SAGE: Free Open Source Mathematics Software
A few more comments...
+1
> One option might be: put the logo where the "SAGE" is now, and then
> on the next line, instead of
>
> Free Open Source Mathematics Software
>
> do
>
> SAGE: Free Open Source Mathematics Software
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to s
On May 6, 2007, at 1:41 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I like it a lot. I have a few aesthetic complaints:
>>
>> 1) Use the logo Alex designed.
>
> Where? In place of a screen shot? I'm not putting it at the top
> instead
> of the sim
On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like it a lot. I have a few aesthetic complaints:
>
> 1) Use the logo Alex designed.
Where? In place of a screen shot? I'm not putting it at the top instead
of the simple text word "SAGE" since many people have told me it is
hard to a
I like it a lot. I have a few aesthetic complaints:
1) Use the logo Alex designed.
2) I don't like 3 of the screenshots.
symbolic.png has too big of fonts; makes it ugly
fortress.png and 37a.png are old! The notebook doesn't look like that
anymore.
3) Center the car -- it looks funny
Hello,
I've posted sage-2.5.alpha3 here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage2.5/
Feedback is welcome. This still won't build on OS X PowerPC or
Cygwin, but should build on Linux and Intel OS X and pass "make test"
there. Also, it should have most code that people have sent me fo
On 5/6/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is one other thing that I know of that breaks on cygwin, which is
> > one point-count example on an elliptic curve over a finite field (PARI
> > fails in this case).
>
> Interesting. Do you have the pari input so that I could have a look at
On May 6, 5:33 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/6/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Hello,
>
> > While libsubgular now passes the tests on cygwin sympow does not. The
> > are more failing tests, but this one is the first I got around to:
>
Sorry, libsingular sti
On 5/6/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While libsubgular now passes the tests on cygwin sympow does not. The
> are more failing tests, but this one is the first I got around to:
You should feel free to not worry too much about this, since:
(1) Sympow has never worked on cygwin.
On 5/6/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like it. I think links at the top are convenient. I would include
> a components link, as I personally think the main webpage should
> acknowledge GAP, PARI, etc. (In fact, on the SAGE authors page
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/rc
After sleeping on it feel even more strongly about zero based
indexing.
Otherwise the semantics of slicing would depend on the context and
lead to confusion. As said by others, consistency is very important
for a CAS.
A user should not have to know where a listlike object comes from to
be able to
I've only looked at the frontpage... I'm wondering if it would not be
better to merge the 2 sets of links :
"Use SAGE Online! (alternate) | Live Tutorial | Download |
Documentation |"
and
"""
DownloadDocumentation
Live Tutorial Mailing Lists, etc
"""
into one big one. The second set o
While libsubgular now passes the tests on cygwin sympow does not. The
are more failing tests, but this one is the first I got around to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /SYMPOW-1.019
$ /sage-2.5.alpha2/local/bin/sympow
sympow 1.018 RELEASE (c) Mark Watkins -**ERROR** QD_check failed at
x[1]
When I build the
Dear David Harvey,
Many thanks for you detailed comments. I agree with all of them,
and made all the changes you suggest to
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/rc/web/index.html
I'm glad you like the clean and straightforward layout of the new page.
--
William Stein
Associate Professo
>
> In terms of missing information, I've heard several complaints that it
> is too hard to figure out how to install the windows version.
> For example, athttp://www.sagemath.org/SAGEbin/microsoft_windows/cygwin/
> there is no zip file, so most people cannot uncompress it.
> One possible solution
Ok,
real_rqdf.pyx also needs a fix:
http://fsmath.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~mabshoff/patches/sage-2.5.0-alpha2-add-NAN-and-INIFINITY-on-cygwin.patch
because NAN and INFINITY are undefined on cygwin.
With that patch I got 2.5.0alpha2 to compile and start on cygwin. I am
currently with Martin
Hello,
isnan and isinf aren't available, so just declare them extern "C"
just like on MacOSX. Patch is available at
http://fsmath.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~mabshoff/patches/sage-2.5.0-alpha2-fix-quaddouble-on-cygwin.patch
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
I like it. I think links at the top are convenient. I would include
a components link, as I personally think the main webpage should
acknowledge GAP, PARI, etc. (In fact, on the SAGE authors page
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/rc/web/ack.html
it would be nice to add a link to the GAP aut
Oh ok. I was trying to build a very clean site that gave detailed
information about SAGE. I don't like William's new site, because it
appears to have very little info about SAGE. With mine, a user will be
able to click on say algebra or calculus and see a page on calculus in
SAGE. The GMP and Octa
On May 6, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> I know all I was trying to do was show that I was working on it and
> what it looked liked so far. I don't know why they are linking that
> way since it is not in my code and I have tried to fix that. Those
> pages do not exist yet, but why bo
It was a problem with my editor. Sorry about it. No other pages exist
yet. I did state this was a work in progress. I just started soon
after William's e-mail.
On 5/6/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know all I was trying to do was show that I was working on it and
> what it loo
I know all I was trying to do was show that I was working on it and
what it looked liked so far. I don't know why they are linking that
way since it is not in my code and I have tried to fix that. Those
pages do not exist yet, but why bother if someone just says no.
On 5/6/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PR
Also: the links to local pages are on your disc, i.e.
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Timothy/My%20Documents/developer_names.html
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from thi
Uh?
On 5/6/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 7:59 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
>
> > It is taking me along time to get much but what I have so far is at
> > http://tclemans.nonlogic.org/sage/
>
> No.
>
> David
>
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~--
On May 6, 2007, at 7:59 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> It is taking me along time to get much but what I have so far is at
> http://tclemans.nonlogic.org/sage/
No.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To un
It is taking me along time to get much but what I have so far is at
http://tclemans.nonlogic.org/sage/
On 5/6/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 3:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm doing a redesign of the SAGE website to target SAGE much
> > m
On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:20, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Thanks. It's coming along slowly but surely. Symmetrica uses macros
> (as functions) pretty extensively. Is there a way in Pyrex/SageX to
> have it treat something like a macro or do you just have to declare it
> like a function?
You just treat
On May 6, 2007, at 3:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing a redesign of the SAGE website to target SAGE much
> more at end users rather than developers (I think the tipping
> point has now arrived, since about 500 people downloaded
> SAGE in the last two weeks...) Anyways, your com
Thanks. It's coming along slowly but surely. Symmetrica uses macros
(as functions) pretty extensively. Is there a way in Pyrex/SageX to
have it treat something like a macro or do you just have to declare it
like a function?
--Mike
On 5/6/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That
Much better but still confusing and the screen seems very busy. I
don't like the two sets of links. I can get a pure css version of it
up soon. SAGE is not an alternative to Mathematica and Maple yet. It
does not run under Windows natively so it is best to say that it runs
under Cygwin well. Link
Hi,
I'm doing a redesign of the SAGE website to target SAGE much
more at end users rather than developers (I think the tipping
point has now arrived, since about 500 people downloaded
SAGE in the last two weeks...) Anyways, your comments
on the mockup here would be welcome:
http://sage.math.w
To some extent I agree. I think what pushed me to the other side is that if
you're having to use an index such an object in the first place, you already
have had to put the effort into learning that package. And for those people
who know the package well and not SAGE well, preserving the native i
That would be really nice.
If it's just plain c code, don't be intimidated by Martin's talk
because that's a whole lot easier than trying to wrap c++. Many of
the interfaces that I've worked with (givaro, linbox, ntl, qd) are
more complicated for this reason... Mostly you should just be abl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> +1 for consistency across the board.
+1 from me too. I'd like to learn Python and SAGE, not 50+ packages.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, sen
63 matches
Mail list logo
