On May 6, 2007, at 15:20 , William Stein wrote:
> > On 5/6/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On May 6, 2007, at 13:57 , William Stein wrote: > I agree. I actually changed it back already (try "refresh" in your > browser). Much better :-} A point I meant to bring up earlier, and forgot (Tim's site reminded me): do you want to keep SAGE as an acronym, or let it stand on its own, uninterpreted? If the former, maybe something like this (centered, of course)? SAGE: Software for ... Free Open ... >> - I understand that people like the logo that's there, but >> personally, I find it a bit jarring; I'm not quite sure >> what I'm looking at every time I see it. > > I agree with you. Alex, is there any possibility you would > consider slightly redesigning the logo to make it look slightly > less abstract? To be clear, it's the way the 'a' and 'g' are joined, together with the 'type face', that makes for a complex visual experience (:-}), at least for me. I think the idea can be maintained, if the visual aspect is modified slightly. But again, since I'm a part-time engineer with no artistic capability, I have lots of opinions about this stuff... Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds ----------- I'm beginning to like the cut of his jibberish. ----------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
