: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 9:59 AM
To: Alan Hewat
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Obtaining a silicon standard wafer
Hi,
Why don't you put these plots on your sales site...
The SRM people would never do this as they would have to explain the plot in a
technical manner to inquiring customers.
Well
lto:alan.he...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alan Hewat
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:20 PM
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Obtaining a silicon standard wafer
if you would like a preprint, send me an email.
Yes, that's the way people should offer supplementary material to list users.
Or even bett
>
> if you would like a preprint, send me an email.
>
Yes, that's the way people should offer supplementary material to list
users. Or even better, link to your preprint.
> Why don't you put these plots on your sales site...
>
The SRM people would never do this as they would have to explain the
Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Obtaining a silicon standard wafer
Thanks for pointing that out David. I should have checked that my reply did not
also include Jim's illustration, which was actually not an "attachment" but
part of an HTML email. I guess that is why it wa
arious SRMs:
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> James P. Cline
>> Materials Measurement Science Division
>> National Institute of Standards and Technology
>> 100 Bureau Dr. stop 8520 [ B113 / Bldg
gt; FAX (301) 975 5334
>
>
>
> From: Fabrizio Guzzetta [mailto:fabrizio.guzze...@gmail.com
> <mailto:fabrizio.guzze...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:24 AM
> To: Cline, James Dr.
> Cc: Young, Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr <mailto:rie
>
> I have always found more useful having LaB6 or corundum
Fabrizio's question "why use silicon powder" might have been answered more
precisely, and in much less than 64 ko (~64,000 letters :-) as follows:
The line width of the NIST Si powder sample 640e is no better than the NIST
sintered coru
uly 14, 2015 3:24 AM
> *To:* Cline, James Dr.
> *Cc:* Young, Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr
> *Subject:* Re: Obtaining a silicon standard wafer
>
>
>
> Thanks Jim for the useful info. I was not aware of this kind of silicon
> standard until now. But can't be polycrystal
-8523USA
jcl...@nist.gov<mailto:jcl...@nist.gov>
(301) 975 5793
FAX (301) 975 5334
From: Fabrizio Guzzetta [mailto:fabrizio.guzze...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:24 AM
To: Cline, James Dr.
Cc: Young, Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Obtaining a silicon standard
Thanks Jim for the useful info. I was not aware of this kind of silicon
standard until now. But can't be polycrystallinity of Silicon a drawback to
use it as standard? Or is there a way to "purify" a single phase suitable
to use as standard? I have always found more useful having LaB6 or corundum
(
Thanks Jim for the useful info. I was not aware of this kind of silicon
standard until now. But can't be polycrystallinity of Silicon a drawback to
use it as standard? Or is there a way to "purify" a single phase that makes
it suitable to use as standard? I have always found more useful having LaB6
Lindsay,
I've seen pressed discs of silicon powder that were supplied with older Philips
diffractometers, and I understand that PANalytical will presently supply them
with their new machines. NIST offers no such standard of silicon in a disc
format. But I can suggest that you consider SRM 640
12 matches
Mail list logo