Thanks for pointing that out David. I should have checked that my reply did not also include Jim's illustration, which was actually not an "attachment" but part of an HTML email. I guess that is why it was not filtered out.
It is rather amusing and a good joke on me. As penance I will re-instate Jim, but I still think he should put such useful illustrations on his NIST product page and just link to them. As it is, the essential information is lost to the Rietveld archive, which doesn't reproduce anything more than text. Regards, Alan. On 14 July 2015 at 16:40, David Elbert <elb...@jhu.edu> wrote: > Hi Alan- > > Just a quick suggestion. You might want to check your mail client > behavior. Your reply telling Jim he is banned for sending an attachment > contained the same attachment. > > I believe many clients default to include attachments when mails are > forwarded or redirected, but strip the attachment when a user chooses > "reply.” Perhaps your email system doesn’t do that or needs to be > configured to do that? > > (I’m sure several Rietveld List users will find the humor in this and > wonder if you are now banned, but I think things got touchy enough a few > weeks ago and so hope we can avoid too much back-and-forth about that. > After all, it can be very hard in an email to tell the subtleties of when > someone is joking, poking fun, being puckish, reproachful, chiding, > scolding, rebuking… and all with differences depending on language and > culture.) > > Regards- > David > > David Elbert > Earth and Planetary Sciences > Olin Hall > Johns Hopkins University > 3400 N. Charles St > Baltimore, MD 21218 > > (410) 516-5049 > > elb...@jhu.edu > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Alan Hewat <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> > wrote: > > Sorry Jim. Even if your attachment is tiny, if I make exceptions it's > unfair to those who have been banned for the same thing. It's only a week, > and nothing personal. > > Why don't you put these plots on your sales site: > https://www-s.nist.gov/srmors/viewTableH.cfm?tableid=149 > > Alan. > > On 14 July 2015 at 12:53, Cline, James Dr. <james.cl...@nist.gov> wrote: > >> I hope I don’t get shot for this, only 64 kb: >> >> >> >> FWHM values of various SRMs: >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Jim >> >> >> >> >> >> James P. Cline >> Materials Measurement Science Division >> National Institute of Standards and Technology >> 100 Bureau Dr. stop 8520 [ B113 / Bldg 217 ] >> Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8523 USA >> jcl...@nist.gov >> (301) 975 5793 >> FAX (301) 975 5334 >> >> >> >> *From:* Fabrizio Guzzetta [mailto:fabrizio.guzze...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:24 AM >> *To:* Cline, James Dr. >> *Cc:* Young, Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr >> *Subject:* Re: Obtaining a silicon standard wafer >> >> >> >> Thanks Jim for the useful info. I was not aware of this kind of silicon >> standard until now. But can't be polycrystallinity of Silicon a drawback to >> use it as standard? Or is there a way to "purify" a single phase suitable >> to use as standard? I have always found more useful having LaB6 or corundum >> (whenever LaB6 is expensive to find) to use it as standard to compare >> instrumental peak broadening. In some of the Rietveld software I use or I >> know, also yttria is used to determine peak broadening. Which criteria do >> you use when choosing a suitable pxrd standard to compare your unknown? Why? >> >> >> >> Thanks for the enlightening discussion. >> >> >> Fabrizio Guzzetta >> >> Ph.D. student, Dept. Quimica Inorganica y Organica, UJI >> >> Castellon de la Plana >> >> Spain >> >> >> >> 2015-07-13 19:56 GMT+02:00 Cline, James Dr. <james.cl...@nist.gov>: >> >> Lindsay, >> >> >> >> I’ve seen pressed discs of silicon powder that were supplied with older >> Philips diffractometers, and I understand that PANalytical will presently >> supply them with their new machines. NIST offers no such standard of >> silicon in a disc format. But I can suggest that you consider SRM 640e >> which is supplied as powder. One can mount a specimen of it carefully to >> obtain high density and a flat specimen surface, and then infiltrate the >> powder bed with silicone based liquid resin such as Vacseal. See: >> >> >> >> http://www.2spi.com/catalog/vac/vacleak.shtml >> >> >> >> The surface of the compact will darken to a uniform color when the >> infiltration is complete. This will result in a stable compact with the >> diffraction properties of SRM 640e. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Jim >> >> >> >> >> >> James P. Cline >> Materials Measurement Science Division >> National Institute of Standards and Technology >> 100 Bureau Dr. stop 8520 [ B113 / Bldg 217 ] >> Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8523 USA >> jcl...@nist.gov >> (301) 975 5793 >> FAX (301) 975 5334 >> >> >> >> *From:* rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] *On >> Behalf Of *Young, Lindsay Kay >> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 1:28 PM >> *To:* rietveld_l@ill.fr >> *Subject:* Obtaining a silicon standard wafer >> >> >> >> Hello Rietvelders - >> >> >> >> This is not exactly a data question, but I am sure someone here can help. >> I am looking into purchasing a silicon powder standard wafer for PXRD >> instrument alignment. However, I am not sure where to get one or how much I >> might expect one to cost. My questions to all of you are: >> >> >> >> - Do you know where I could purchase this type of standard? >> >> - How much would you expect to pay for one? >> >> - I have been told Gem Dugout makes these, but they may not be around any >> more. Does anyone know what happened to them? >> >> >> >> Thank you very much for your help, and I hope you all have a great >> weekend! >> >> >> >> - Lindsay Young >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list < >> alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> >> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body >> text >> The Rietveld_L list archive is on >> http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list < >> alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> >> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body >> text >> The Rietveld_L list archive is on >> http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> > > > -- > ______________________________________________ > * Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics, Grenoble, FRANCE * > <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> +33.476.98.41.68 > http://www.NeutronOptics.com/hewat > <http://www.neutronoptics.com/hewat> > ______________________________________________ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com > > > Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body > text > The Rietveld_L list archive is on > http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > -- ______________________________________________ * Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics, Grenoble, FRANCE * <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> +33.476.98.41.68 http://www.NeutronOptics.com/hewat ______________________________________________
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
