times true that this occurs?
Do you have an example value (old and new) that caused you problems?
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho
On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Jorge Garrido wrote:
> Hi
>
> Recently, i ve implemented riak search, but I am worried about a problem:
>
> When
ome back online without data. MapReduce will not
currently trigger a read repair, but that problem should be resolved with the
forthcoming Riak 1.3 release.
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho
On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:05 AM, gu...@mail.mipt.ru wrote:
> We have 6 node riak cluster.I simple custom
v http://"; $1 ":" $2 "/riak//" }' > /tmp/runme.sh
The goal is to pick out all occurrences of "{http," from the cluster
information file and run:
curl -v http://:/riak//
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho
On Jan 31, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Martin
I believe you're looking for this:
https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/blob/master/priv/mapred_builtins.js
Found via:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/1.2.0/references/appendices/MapReduce-Implementation/
Thanks for checking out Riak!
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho
On
ks to DevJam for making their space available, and we hope to see you there.
[0] http://devjam.com/
[1] http://www.meetup.com/Twin-Cities-Riak-Meetup/events/106353292/
[2] http://basho.com/introducing-riak-1-3/
[3] http://ricon.io/
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Greetings and salutations.
We're now making the Riak recap a team effort for the Basho technical
evangelists, so expect to see a little more content. This latest is
particularly long due to the release of 1.3 and a two week gap since
our last note.
John
twitter.com/macintux
Riak Recap for Februa
Only a week since our last Recap. We might be on to something here.
Another week closer to RICON in New York City in May. Even distributed
systems need to leverage a little locality now and again, so come join
us for some concentrated awesomeness.
Early bird pricing ends March 15, so be sure to r
looked into the mechanism for that.
[1] application:stop(riak_kv), followed by application:start(riak_kv)
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
jda...@basho.com
On Mar 5, 2013, at 10:01 AM, Chris Read wrote:
> Greetings all...
>
> We have had a situation where someone ran a List Buckets query
ss common under Riak 1.3, although
ownership handoff will still exacerbate the problem.
[1] https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/issues/358
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
jda...@basho.com
On Mar 6, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Jeremy Raymond wrote:
> So I should expect {error, notfound} inputs to map jo
mething(RiakObj, _, _) ->
> Metadata = riak_object:get_metadata(RiakObj),
> case dict:is_key(<<"X-Riak-Deleted">>, Metadata) of
> true ->
> []; % I have a tombstone
> false ->
> [ok] % I have a valid item
&g
objects, and is effectively the only way to do so.
Active anti-entropy in Riak 1.3.0 has most of what's necessary to automatically
clean up all deleted objects, but that is not a current feature. I'll make sure
a ticket is filed with that feature request.
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
jd
Reminder: early bird pricing for RICON East ends Friday, as does the CFP.
* ---> http://ricon.io/east.html
And don't forget: hoodies!
John
twitter.com/macintux
Riak Recap for March 6 - 12
===
1) A new release of the Perl library Net::Riak has been released. It
now suppo
in Texas this year, and I'll definitely be
looking for users to talk about their experiences with Riak. Please let me know
if you'd be interested in sharing your pain points and successes (not
necessarily in that order).
And, of course, the essentials: free food and swag.
-John Daily
Actually, I believe the document is correct; there is a
riak_cs_kv_multi_backend module in the CS tree which appears to be forked from
riak_kv_multi_backend.
In general, though, you're more than welcome to file tickets against the
documentation set via github: https://github.com/basho/basho_doc
e hardware currently in your account if you're not careful.)
[1] https://github.com/basho/basho_bench
[2] http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/cookbooks/Benchmarking/
[3] http://www.baremetalcloud.com/
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho Technologies
___
om/Atlanta-Riak-Meetup/events/112848852/
Eric Redmond will be talking about Riak at Railsberry in Krakow
- April 23-24 / http://railsberry.com/
Steve Vinoski and Andy Gross will be talking at GOTO Chicago, where
you can also find a Basho booth with John Daily talking Riak, Erlang,
or chromatic harmon
We're back with yet another Recap.
Big news for the week: SoftLayer now offers Riak and Riak Enterprise out of the
box in their bare metal server hosting environment. Big news for everyone at
RICON East or NYC environs is that SoftLayer is sponsoring the after party, so
if you somehow can't mak
As you may have noticed, this week on the blog I've been tackling the deeper
meanings of various behavioral configuration parameters, ranging from ye olde
r/w parameters to the much more obscure basic_quorum.
After posting today's missive, the esteemed Andrew Thompson noticed that
something I d
Thanks for the kind words, Jeremiah.
Jeremy, if you find anything that's wrong with that description of sibling
behavior, please let me know. It's always possible I missed something
important.
-John
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013, Jeremiah Peschka wrote:
> John Daily (@macintux) wrote
and pr=quorum (which would mean that attempting to write the same key
in a partitioned scenario would fail unless a majority of the primary vnodes
are reachable).
Hopefully someone else who's given this some thought in the past will jump in;
I'll make further inquiries tomorrow.
-John
=pr=quorum.
>
> Immutable values is a much better way of putting it, although I technically
> need deletion as well for this particular example.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:24 PM, John Daily wrote:
> A few quick thoughts...
>
> W
r.
If you have interesting Riak experiences to share (or other distributed systems
theory/learnings), please contact us. Your active involvement can only improve
RICON.
CFP: http://ricon.io/blog/2013-06-03-West-cfp-officially-open.html
RICON West: http://ricon.io/west.html
-John Daily
Technical E
Two important points:
First, n_val determines how many partitions (or virtual nodes) the data will be
distributed to. The ring size determines how many partitions exist, and should
be a much larger number than the number of servers your cluster will run on.
Riak's default ring size is 64, so de
> Correct. With lww = true, the vector clocks will be ignored and the
> most-recent timestamp will win. Is this not what you're seeing?
To be precise, the most recent timestamp will win as long as allow_mult=false.
lww=true just optimizes the code path a bit.
http://basho.com/understanding-riak
A couple of quick notes (that may be perfectly obvious, but just in case) to
augment Joe's response:
Nodes will have to be restarted before those properties take effect.
Increasing n_val on buckets is risky: old keys will still only live on the
original n_val (smaller) number of nodes, but requ
Per http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/cookbooks/Backups/, you need not only
Bitcask data but also ring data and configuration.
-John
On Jul 18, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Mark Wagner wrote:
> Here is what I am doing: on OSX
>
> # Install riak on my local OSX development box
> brew install riak
>
>
riak cs for large files (50MB-15GB) is it possible to raise
> the chunk size up to these Filesizes, to prevent the system from heavy
> network traffic?
Definitely not. Erlang's distribution protocol will behave badly with objects
that large.
atest/ops/advanced/riak-control/
[1] http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/running/rolling-upgrades/
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo
Greetings, Riak world.
It's time to say farewell to July. There will be many opportunities to see the
Basho crew out and about in August, so I've included the next couple of weeks
below, and you can always visit http://basho.com/events to see what's coming to
your community.
Don't forget that
Excellent news. How many buckets with custom settings did you create?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Paul Ingalls wrote:
For those interested, I identified my performance problem.
I was creating a lot of buckets, and the properties did not match the
default bucket properties o
Maybe 50k or so...
Paul Ingalls
Founder & CEO Fanzo
p...@fanzo.me
@paulingalls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulingalls
On Aug 2, 2013, at 3:54 PM, John Daily wrote:
Excellent news. How many buckets with custom settings did you create?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Paul
gt; Paul Ingalls
> Founder & CEO Fanzo
> p...@fanzo.me
> @paulingalls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulingalls
>
>
>
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 5:08 PM, John Daily wrote:
>
>> 50k definitely is a fair few. What's the objective for that many, if I may
>&g
in us for free food and drinks on August 27th.
http://www.meetup.com/DFW-Riak-Meetup/events/134337442/
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho Technologies
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo
ntact us on this list or via issues on GitHub if you have questions or
concerns.
[1] https://github.com/basho
[2] https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/wiki/Git-Flow
[3] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
[4] https://github.com/basho/riak/wiki/Basho-repository-management
-Jo
The Recap took an (unplanned) August vacation, rather like the rest of the
civilized world, but we're back.
The most important news: RICON West tickets are still available, but early bird
ticket sales end Thursday morning (US). If you've been to a RICON, you know why
you shouldn't miss this; if
Summer draws to its unofficial close in the northern hemisphere, but that just
means tech conferences are spinning back up. We know RICON will be high on the
priority list for anyone reading this; check out the speakers list and ask
yourself if you really want to miss a chance to bend the ear of
Riak Recap returns after a busy couple of weeks, including one of the more
spectacular developer conferences anywhere in the world, Strange Loop. If
you've not yet attended, you're missing out.
Garrett Eardley of Riot Games talked at Strange Loop about migrating from MySQL
to Riak for scale; we
What you saw is actually quite typical when using R=1.
When you turn off a node, Riak's sloppy quorum behavior will kick in and hand
off some of your read requests to an empty data partition to supplement the two
remaining partitions that still have a copy. Since the partition is empty, it
can
oads: http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/riakcs-downloads/
Thanks.
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist, Basho
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Responses inline.
On Oct 11, 2013, at 7:10 PM, kzhang wrote:
> I read the documentation again
> (http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/references/http/fetch-object/).
>
> r - (read quorum) how many replicas need to agree when retrieving the object
> (default is defined by the bucket)
Not agree
Replies inline
On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:49 AM, kzhang wrote:
> I think the below setting is what we want to use for our environment
>> r = 1
>> notfound_ok=false
>> basic_quorum = true
>>
>> the client gets notfound if the first two replies are notfound? if the
>> first
>> reply is found, the clie
If you really want an S3 API layer around NFS, I suspect you'd be better off
taking the code from Riak CS and creating your own solution than attempting
this approach.
One example of how this would run into trouble: if any server fails, nearly
every large object would be unavailable because of
How well-synchronized are your system clocks?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Greenstein wrote:
>
>
> We’re doing new puts with a blank vector clock. There are several seconds
> between updates to the object though.
>
> Dave
>
>
>> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Andrew Th
solutions
-
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2013-October/013475.html
Drew Searcy posted a blog on troubleshooting Riak daemon startup problems
- http://drewsearcy.com/troubleshooting-riak-startup/
John Daily captured some of the differences between Riak and Riak CS
com/index.html (for those of you who haven't seen
> > Salt Stack yet)
> >
> > Basho now has a dedicated conference page on Lanyrd, if you're curious
> > where you can find us next
> > - http://lanyrd.com/basho/
> >
> > While we're talking abo
The Basho TE team is kicking off a new weekly forum an hour from now: the Riak
Community Hangout[1].
Most[2] Fridays at 11am Pacific/2pm Eastern/7pm[3] GMT we'll be holding a 15-30
minute, development-focused Google Hangout, with the video to be posted later
on YouTube[4].
A primary focus for
Updating any key without supplying a vector clock is guaranteed to create a
sibling.
-John
On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Mark A. Basil, Jr. wrote:
> Is there some method that is either guaranteed or very highly likely to
> create Siblings of an object (that isn’t a counter)? I would like to ha
And so it begins:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxzGY6_DnQU
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
If you upload the files from Windows, and download them to the Ubuntu VM, do
inconsistencies ever appear?
-John
On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Engel Sanchez wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> This looks puzzling. Just from looking at the code we haven't found anything
> suspicious. Would you mind postin
(And the inverse would also be interesting to know.)
-John
On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:41 PM, John Daily wrote:
> If you upload the files from Windows, and download them to the Ubuntu VM, do
> inconsistencies ever appear?
>
> -John
>
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Engel Sanchez
Forcing siblings other than for testing purposes is not typically a good idea;
as you indicate, the object size can easily become a problem as all siblings
will live inside the same Riak value.
Your counter-example sounds a lot like a use case for server-side CRDTs; data
structures that allow t
r my use case, but they
> seem overkill for simple append operations when I don't need delete
> functionality. Creating your own CRDTs are trivial if you never need to
> delete.
>
> Thoughts are welcome,
> Jason
> From: John Daily
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2013
allow_mult=true is the recommended approach for addressing conflict resolution;
when multiple writes to the same object are received and vector clocks cannot
determine a causal history, all copies of the writes are retained for future
merging/selection by the application. We are planning to make
-Release-Notes/
Downloads: http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/riakcs-downloads/
Thanks.
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
> 2) You could set your default backend in the confgs to use multi-backend.
> When it comes time to age out your data, you can switch the backend on a
> bucket by bucket basis and hope for the best. This isn't supported or tested
> by Basho (as far as I know), so you'll be on your own on this
We’ll be continuing our discussions of Riak 2.0: specifically, security and
conflict resolution. 2pm Eastern.
http://youtu.be/_QomrZc29fw
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/ria
Technical difficulties, new link
http://youtu.be/n8m8xlizekg
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
for a great 2013.
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho Technologies
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Alex Moore and I provided some general time series advice and links on
StackOverflow recently:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19384686/what-is-the-most-efficient-way-to-store-time-series-in-riak-with-heavy-reads
Broadly speaking, issuing dynamic queries via MapReduce is going to be less
des
Riak users,
Riak 1.4.6 was pushed to the apt and yum repositories and is now available for
download from docs.basho.com.
Along with bug fixes, the most notable changes involve 2i. We have reverted to
unsorted key lists by default for better performance, added regular expression
filters for ran
I could be wrong, but I believe there’s metadata overhead for each sibling, so
even if all data in all siblings needs to be retained, it’s still more
efficient to merge and save them as one object.
-John
On Dec 20, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Andrew Stone wrote:
> Think of an object with thousands of s
Note this:
{multi_backend, [
%% Here's where you set the individual multiplexed
backends
{<<"eleveldb_mult">>, riak_kv_eleveldb_backend, [
{data_root, "
That'd be version 1.4.6.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Matthew Von-Maszewski wrote:
>
> P.S. Unrelated to your question: Riak 1.4.4 is available for download. It
> has a couple of nice bug fixes for leveldb.
___
riak-users mai
Welcome to the first 2014 Riak Recap.
Since last we spoke, Riak 1.4.6 was unveiled, along with an updated Chef
cookbook:
-
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2013-December/014327.html
- http://community.opscode.com/cookbooks/riak
We've also hosted another Riak Community
We’ll be talking CorrugatedIron with Jeremiah Peschka and David Rusek at 2
Eastern. Learn more about sausage-making in the client libraries.
https://plus.google.com/events/cmovsvget093sa91rjas3ac4a3s
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists
If you’ve been a part of the Riak community for a while, you won’t want to miss
today’s Community Hangout. Hector Castro and I will be joined by two people who
have been among the more prominent faces for Basho for a very long time: Andy
Gross and Mark Phillips. We’ll take a look back at where w
Replies inline.
(Thanks to Russell for the link to my blog series, but honestly, as I now
re-read the section on conflict resolution, I’m unhappy with it. It’s a very
confusing topic and I regret not doing a better job of clarifying it. This
answer will undoubtedly also be more confusing than I
A minor Riak CS bugfix release, 1.4.4, is available. There are no Stanchion or
Riak CS Control updates, so versions 1.4.3 and 1.0.2 remain the latest releases
of those components.
http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/riakcs-downloads/
http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/cookbooks/Riak-CS-Re
After asking around a bit, I think we’re likely to remove that recommendation
from the documentation.
Tuning is always a bit of a dark art, so as always your mileage may vary, but
there doesn’t seem to be any real advantage to lowering the thread count.
Thanks for raising the issue.
-John
On
week...).
John Daily
twitter.com/macintux
---
Riak Recap for January 24th - February 11th
===
Riak CS 1.4.4 (bugfixes only) was released.
-
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2014-February/014599.html
-
We pushed this week’s hangout back a bit due to scheduling conflicts. I’ll send
out a link after 3pm.
Today’s topic: data modeling. Don’t miss it.
As a reminder, previous hangouts can be viewed at our YouTube page (and that’s
another way to watch today’s live without waiting for me to send a di
Will be starting at ~3:30 Eastern.
http://youtu.be/uDR-sdBCPug
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
I strongly recommend sticking with the 1.4 series until 2.0 is formally
released.
The 2.0 features are great, but making certain that upgrades will go smoothly
is a top priority for every major release of Riak, and this will be no
exception. You can upgrade when the time is right for your needs
Siblings in CS are strictly for internal purposes, and handled by the
CS layer. They aren't exposed to S3 (or similar) clients.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Lee Sylvester wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> So, I'm using a Riak CS cluster and interfacing with it using Erlcloud. My
I don't have time at the moment to respond in more detail, I'm afraid, but
you should find this blog series quite useful.
http://basho.com/understanding-riaks-configurable-behaviors-part-1/
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 28, 2014, at 5:56 AM, Alex De la rosa
wrote:
Hi there,
Can somebody help me
Weighted claim is indeed on the wishlist, but I don't believe it has yet
been assigned to any particular planned release.
-John
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Thomas Santero wrote:
> Hi Chaim,
>
> Inline
>
> On Jul 6, 2014, at 1:13 AM, Chaim Solomon
> wrote:
>
> I don't think I was quite cle
We are disabling the backup component in riak-admin in 2.0.
Instead, we recommend following the detailed instructions in
http://docs.basho.com/riak/2.0.0/ops/running/backups/
-John
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Alfonso Hooker wrote:
> I am looking for some information regarding the backup
This blog post on configuring S3 clients to work with CS may be useful:
http://basho.com/riak-cs-proxy-vs-direct-configuration/
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Andrew Stone wrote:
Hi Charles,
AFAIK we haven't ever tested Riak Cs with the MapR connector. However, if
MapR works
I don't have benchmarks to discuss query performance for different tools at
different sizes, but I'd like to point out that the ultimate search tool
for Riak is to not search at all.
Riak Search, 2i, MapReduce are all capable tools, but they don't scale
nearly as well as straight key/value request
Siblings are resolved automatically by Riak when using our data types, thus
the requirement that allow_mult=true.
-John
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Alex De la rosa
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was trying to create a bucket-type using the datatype MAP and it didn't
> allow me to create it with
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Dmitri Zagidulin
wrote:
> If you're running a single-node Riak instance to start with (such as a
> prototype web app), but there's the possibility of expanding the cluster
> and adding other nodes, you should run with n_val=3. (It's not recommended
> to change th
Basho only tests and supports upgrades 2 major releases forward, so 1.3 or
1.4 can be upgraded to 2.0, but 1.2 may or may not work.
I'd strongly recommend upgrading to 1.4.10 before moving to 2.0.
Some useful links:
* http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/upgrading/rolling-upgrades/
* http://docs
If you can help us what goal is trying to be achieved by taking that
approach, perhaps we can refute the logic (or find a better solution). It
sounds suspiciously like someone is trying to avoid the complexities of
siblings and conflict resolution (a goal which your architecture doesn't
actually ac
The n_val represents the number of copies of the data, regardless of the number
of servers in the cluster. If you have n_val=3 and only 1 server, 3 copies of
each piece of data will be on that server (and performance will be generally
abysmal because every read and write request will effectively
I’ve written a bit about modeling patterns at
http://basho.com/riak-development-anti-patterns/
I expanded a bit on it in contributions to the latest version of Eric Redmond’s
outstanding http://littleriakbook.com (make sure to grab one of the downloads,
the HTML is out of date).
-John
On Nov
Agreed, that’s a useful article, highly recommended.
-John
On Nov 25, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Troy Melhase wrote:
> Lots of insight here:
>
> https://highlyscalable.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/nosql-data-modeling-techniques/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:47 PM, John Daily
You may wish to take a look at the support for post-commit hooks:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/commit-hooks/
-John
On Jan 23, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Никита Нежевский wrote:
> Hello.
> I've used riak for online processing of incoming data and faced with problem.
> I've used riak-er
otaryPhone
>
> On Jan 24, 2015, at 08:55, Никита Нежевский > wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply, I will try to use post-commit hooks. But is it
> possible to realize this possibility at riak-erlang-client?
>
> Sat Jan 24 2015 at 0:12:57, John Daily >:
>
>&g
Daniel, you may be aware of this, but a 3-node Riak cluster is not
recommended and may be playing a minor role in your resource problems.
Every request will hit every server (except for some requests that are
being made twice against a single server, making I/O that much worse), and
depending on yo
You certainly can with some careful tuning.
However, if Riak is being used for heavy traffic loads, you’ll likely see poor
performance as a consequence. Those large objects effectively clog the pipes
temporarily.
Hopefully someone can chime in with tuning recommendations, but make certain
allo
Both LevelDB and Bitcask are optimized for smaller objects, so neither will be
particularly good at it.
Again: this is possible but discouraged.
-John
On Feb 20, 2015, at 10:01 AM, SeanProtain wrote:
> HI John,
>
> Thank you! Then which backend I should choose to store images?
>
> Subject:
Agreed: exposing any database directly to the Internet is risky, and Riak’s
security introduced in 2.0 doesn’t really change that.
-John
On Apr 16, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Alexander Sicular wrote:
> That should work but are you sure you want to expose your riak server to the
> Internet? I would rec
Unfortunately it’s very easy to introduce syntax errors into Erlang
configuration files (and tricky to diagnose them without Erlang experience),
which is why we’re moving toward the newer sysctl-style files like riak.conf.
The example in the documentation looks ok; can we see a copy of your
adv
provided in an Erlang array, with square brackets
and a period terminating it.
See http://pastebin.com/90gh6amg.
-John
On Apr 17, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
> 2015-04-17 17:04 GMT+05:00 John Daily :
>> Unfortunately it’s very easy to introduce syntax errors in
Riak does not currently try to protect you against dumping 2 gallons of water
in a 1 gallon jug, so each node will write data until it can’t.
-John
On Apr 23, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Alex De la rosa wrote:
> Cool, thank you :) however, is true that if 4 nodes are 1TB and the other one
> is 2TB; th
That’s correct: upgrades to either 2.0.x or 2.1.x are supported from the
1.4 series.
Side note: I definitely recommend testing the upgrade process in a QA
environment first.
-John
On Aug 5, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Sujay Mansingh wrote:
Hello all, I have a 5 node riak cluster, all nodes running 1.4
One of our engineers has been working on 18 for a while now. He’s not around
today, but hopefully will chime in soon.
-John
> On Nov 17, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Victor Medina wrote:
>
> =)first of all thanks!
>
> Im building it with OTP17. Everything seems to be just fine with 17 so far...
> Thin
retrieved from the <<"відро"/utf8>> bucket.
-John Daily
jda...@basho.com
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Fasil K wrote:
> Thanks Daniel. This means a lot
>
> With Regards,
>
> Fasil K
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Daniel Abrahamsson <
> da
This smells like a clock problem. Are you confident all of your servers’ clocks
are set to the same time?
Updates can be treacherous if clocks are not synchronized and multiple writes
to the same key occur in a period of time short enough to fit within the clock
skew.
I wrote about this after
We punted on a bucket type API with Riak 2.0 because we tied authorization
heavily to bucket types and didn’t have the time to unravel that knot. Since
then we have yet to prioritize it.
I will make sure this is on the roadmap.
-John
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 2:15 PM, Nguyen, Kyle wrote:
>
> Hi a
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
