Both LevelDB and Bitcask are optimized for smaller objects, so neither will be particularly good at it.
Again: this is possible but discouraged. -John On Feb 20, 2015, at 10:01 AM, SeanProtain <barco...@hotmail.com> wrote: > HI John, > > Thank you! Then which backend I should choose to store images? > > Subject: Re: [riak-user] can store images directly in Riak? > From: jda...@basho.com > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:31:58 -0500 > CC: riak-users@lists.basho.com > To: barco...@hotmail.com > > You certainly can with some careful tuning. > > However, if Riak is being used for heavy traffic loads, you’ll likely see > poor performance as a consequence. Those large objects effectively clog the > pipes temporarily. > > Hopefully someone can chime in with tuning recommendations, but make certain > allow_mult is set to false; if those images end up with siblings, things can > get very ugly. > > We generally recommend Riak CS to manage the chunking of data into Riak to > store large objects. > > -John > > On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:13 AM, SeanProtain <barco...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Dear, > > Can I directly store images as big as 2~6MB into riak as an object? > > Thank you! > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
