Re: [regext] OK, What Next? (was RDAP Extensions Approach Analysis v2)

Hi all, Sorry for not responding to this earlier, but after an extended vacation it took me quite some time to digest the discussion and form an opinion. We would like you to know that I have published the agenda for IETF114, and we have reserved a 30 minutes discussion on this topic. We would

[regext] Call for agenda items IETF 115

Hi All, Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 115 to see how much time we need for our meeting. Jim and I are thinking to request a same one hour time slot as last IETF 114 meeting, unless we get a lot of requests from you for new work. So if you intend to request for a presentation,

[regext] Second WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

Dear Working Group, The authors of the following working group document have indicated that it is believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/ This WG last call will end at

Re: [regext] Second WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

support (a simple “+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document by replying to this message on the list. Regards, Jim and Antoin > Op 12 sep. 2022, om 15:54 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het volgende geschreven: > > Dear Working Group, > > The author

Re: [regext] Extended Second WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

m and Antoin > Op 26 sep. 2022, om 11:46 heeft Mario Loffredo > het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Patrick, > > thanks for your review. > > Please find my comments inline. > > Il 25/09/2022 18:21, Patrick Mevzek ha scritto: >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022, at 08:54, A

Re: [regext] Extended Second WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

make this statement? After all these are addressed, then we can declare consensus and move the document along. > Op 26 sep. 2022, om 16:00 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het volgende geschreven: > > Given the discussion below, we are considering to extend this WGLC for at > mo

Re: [regext] Extended Second WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

material change, we will issue another WGLC once the document is stable and all issues are addressed, so that we can make a clear consensus call on the final stable version of this document. Regards, Jim and Antoin > Op 3 okt. 2022, om 15:26 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het volgende gesc

Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm that all their issues are now addressed in version 17, so that the document shepherd can confirm there are no new changes to be expected during WG

[regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-harrison-regext-rdap-rir-search

This is the formal adoption request for RDAP RIR Search: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-harrison-regext-rdap-rir-search/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by REGEXT and comment to the list, clearly stating your view. This Call For Adoption

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-harrison-regext-rdap-rir-search

00 is published. Thanks, Jim and Antoin > Op 19 dec. 2022, om 15:33 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het volgende geschreven: > > This is the formal adoption request for RDAP RIR Search: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-harrison-regext-rdap-rir-search/ > >

[regext] Call for agenda items IETF 116

Hi All, Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 116. Jim and I requested an hour time slot, same as last IETF 115 meeting. So if you intend to request for a presentation, please let the chairs know. Regards, Jim and Antoin ___ regext mailing

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items IETF 116

gt; --Dan > > On 2/13/23, 9:18 AM, "regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren" > mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of > ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > > > Caution: This email originated from outsi

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-19.txt

Tom, Since you were the last one to comment, can you please confirm that the issues you raised on version 17 of this document are now resolved and the document is stable so we can issue a WGLC? Regards, Jim and Antoin > Op 6 mrt. 2023, om 11:54 heeft Mario Loffredo het > volgende geschreve

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-01.txt

Chair hat off. Thank you Tom for this document and your presentation. I like it a lot. I have read this draft, and have some comments/requests as discussed during our IETF 116 meeting session. Most of my remarks are about section 4, Link Relations: 1. Suggest to replace “operator” with “server

[regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-11

The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed Standard: Redacted Fields in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Response https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted/1

[regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-regext-brown-epp-ttl

This is a formal adoption request for Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) values: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-regext-brown-epp-ttl/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by REGEXT and comment to this mes

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-01.txt

Mar 30, 2023 at 10:37:54AM +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote: >> I have read this draft, and have some comments/requests as discussed >> during our IETF 116 meeting session. >> Most of my remarks are about section 4, Link Relations: >> >> 1. Suggest to replace “operato

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-regext-brown-epp-ttl

draft name: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl The document authors must also identify a document shepherd. If you would like to volunteer please let them know. Work can begin as soon as the 00 is published. Thanks, Jim and Antoin > Op 25 apr. 2023, om 22:54 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het vo

Re: [regext] EXTENDED WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-11

working group, and issue another WGLC when the issues are resolved. Regards, Jim and Antoin. > Op 17 apr. 2023, om 15:27 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het volgende geschreven: > > The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for > submission to the IESG t

[regext] Call for agenda items IETF 117

Hi All, Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 117. Jim and I requested a one and half hour time slot this time. Half an hour more than IETF 116. So if you intend to request for a presentation, please let the chairs know. Regards, Jim and Antoin ___

[regext] Call for agenda items IETF 118

Hi All, Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 118. Jim and I requested a one and half hour time slot this time, same as IETF 117. So if you intend to request for a presentation, please let the chairs know. Regards, Jim and Antoin ___ regext

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items IETF 118

Hi Maarten, Unfortunately, our agenda for IETF 118 is already fully booked with no space to overrun. Perhaps we should consider a 2 hour meeting request for next IETF 119. Regards, Antoin > Op 16 okt. 2023, om 17:52 heeft Maarten Wullink > het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Antoin, > > Maybe

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items IETF 118

t;>> Antoin, >>> >>> I'm willing to give up agenda items 6.iv. (rdap-extensions) and 6.v. >>> (rdap-x-media-type) to give Maarten 10 minutes to discuss restful EPP. >>> To me that seems like a better use of face-to-face time as both of my >>

[regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-geofeed

This is a formal adoption request for An RDAP Extension for Geofeed Data: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-geofeed/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by REGEXT and comment to this message on the list, clearly stating your v

[regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed Standard: RDAP RIR Search https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search/05/ Please indicate your support or no objection for t

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-geofeed

. Thanks, Jim and Antoin > Op 20 nov. 2023, om 15:36 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het volgende geschreven: > > This is a formal adoption request for An RDAP Extension for Geofeed Data: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-geofeed/ > > Ple

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

Reminder, This WGLC will end tonight. So far we only had 3 notifications of support. (And a comment from the document shepherd) Please indicate your support if you didn’t already do so for us to judge consensus. Regards, Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin > Op 27 nov. 2023, om 15:51 heeft Ant

[regext] Call for agenda items IETF119

Hi all, It is time to schedule our session for IETF 119 next week. Since we had too little time scheduled for IETF 118 where we filled our complete 1,5 hour time slot, we are thinking of requesting 2 hours this time if people come up with enough agenda items. We see enough reasons on the list th

[regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-hollenbeck-regext-epp-delete-bcp

This is the formal adoption request for Best Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-epp-delete-bcp/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

are addressed, please write the document shepherd writeup. Thanks to everyone that contributed to this review! Regards, Jim and Antoin REGEXT WG Co-Chairs > Op 27 nov. 2023, om 15:51 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het volgende geschreven: > > The document editors have indica

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

the purposes > of signalling, and it's fine for this sort of thing to override the > requirement above. (nro_rdap_profile_asn_flat_0 and > nro_rdap_profile_asn_hierarchical_0 are examples of this, where the document > itself requires implementations to pick one or the other,

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-hollenbeck-regext-epp-delete-bcp

chairs know. Thanks, Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin > Op 29 jan. 2024, om 16:17 heeft Antoin Verschuren > het volgende geschreven: > > This is the formal adoption request for Best Practices for Deletion of Domain > and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisionin

[regext] REGEXT Agenda IETF 119 Brisbane

Hi all, I just uploaded our preliminary agenda for IETF 119 to the datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/agenda-119-regext-00 Please verify that I didn’t forget or misinterpreted any requests and let the chairs know if you still want a slot on our agenda. Though our ag

[regext] Call for agenda items for Berlin

can, Regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] reseller drafts reviews

policy. Also thinking ahead of the possibility to administer 3th party dns-operators with limited rights agreed upon by the parent registrar, which might encounter the same question.. Just a thought. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 15 aug. 2016, om

Re: [regext] reseller drafts reviews

and reporting, and others don’t. Should we provision for both, or only one use case? Thoughts? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail _

[regext] Meeting in Seoul

things like a demo, hacking session, compliance testing, or a reviewers meeting request you would like to clarify during the meeting. Please let us know before Friday, as that is our deadline for meeting sessions requests. regards, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB

[regext] Agenda items for IETF97

updates or discussions, please do! and let us know. Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) IETF 97, Seoul, South Korea, Agenda Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org 1. Welcome and Introductions (5 minutes) i. Jabber scribe ii. Notes scribe iii

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

your opinion on this mailinglist so Jim can summarize them in a response to the IESG. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 9 nov. 2016, om 14:41 heeft Job Snijders het volgende geschreven: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:19:44PM +, Hollenbeck

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext-01.txt

for the reseller object, as I think that may change the current text quite a bit.. Regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 7 dec. 2016, om 09:35 heeft Linlin Zhou het volgende geschreven: > This is a very minor update, mostly just to

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext-01.txt

(generic role object for roles like resellers/dns-operators/etc.). Is there any progress or suggestion from the authors on this? Do we need to make another call on the mailing list to get a clearer consensus or discussion? Do the authors want to do this themselves, or do they need any

[regext] Meeting in Chicago

and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

[regext] Working group action required on draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext-01.txt

the choice more difficult by inventing an option 3. Regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 18 jan. 2017, om 06:40 heeft Linlin Zhou het volgende geschreven: > Dear Antoin, > Thanks for your review. Please see my feedback below. >

Re: [regext] Interest in Drafts?

afterwards to restore, or even failure of or criticism on our industry diversity. Regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 12 jan. 2017, om 19:36 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott het volgende geschreven: > Is anyone interested in reviewing a pair of dra

Re: [regext] Meeting Agenda for IETF-98?

Hi Scott, I’ll have a preliminary agenda and call for agenda items tomorrow, just waiting for some private responses about the working session. Stay tuned. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 1 mrt. 2017, om 19:57 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott het

[regext] Working Session @ IETF 98

s for our regular meeting session will follow later today. Regards, Antoin and Jim. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ regext mailing

[regext] Call for agenda items/preliminary agenda IETF 98

98, Chicago, USA, Agenda Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org 1. Welcome and Introductions (5 minutes) i. Jabber scribe ii. Notes scribe iii. NOTE WELL 2. Existing Document Status 2.a. Published (2 minutes) i. Extensible Provisioning

Re: [regext] Working group action required on draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext-01.txt

. Using a more generic "organization” object, not tagging an organization as a one and only role as a reseller will allow an entity to have multiple roles. This will decrease data to be maintained by both registry and the organizations involved. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 56

Re: [regext] Working group action required on draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext-01.txt

le in relation to a provisioning object, so they can use the new service belonging with that role. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 3 mrt. 2017, om 16:12 heeft Gould, James het volgende geschreven: > I believe that “Option 1: A dedicated reseller ob

Re: [regext] Working Session @ IETF 98

discussion that will be published later today. I’m happy to clarify my personal thoughts on these documents and take part in the discussion remotely. We will have one meetecho setup in the room, and Jim and I will schedule the work session as to accommodate the remote participation for this dis

[regext] Preliminary Agenda for IETF 98

have enough time. Regards, Antoin and Jim - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/ma

Re: [regext] [Ext] URGENT: NOTE SCHEDULE CHANGE

presenters on the agenda to please send us your presentations so we can upload them to the datatracker for attendees to prepare. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 24 mrt. 2017, om 22:20 heeft James Galvin het volgende geschreven: > Good catch! >

Re: [regext] URGENT: NOTE SCHEDULE CHANGE

Hi Andy, I don’t have any issues with that, and I think Scott will agree, so I have swapped those items in our new agenda for this session: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/agenda/agenda-98-regext-10 - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 26 mrt

Re: [regext] Proposed Changes to Milestones

nsensus on the mailinglist after IETF97 that this would be the path forward, and the authors have rewritten their documents that are now eligible to be on our milestone list. So the reseller documents will be deleted from the milestones, but the organization documents will replace them. - -- An

Re: [regext] Proposed Changes to Milestones

always add them again later. But at least we will know what we are working on now, and we could adopt new documents that do have traction. We’re interested on your thoughts. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 19 mei 2017, om 17:01 heeft Roger D Carney

Re: [regext] Proposed Changes to Milestones

the document was ready for WGLC to set a date in our milestones. The document is already adopted by the WG, but it could do with more review and implementation experience beyond Verisign according to the authors. regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392

[regext] Changes to Milestones

now. For all the other documents, we will adjust the dates as discussed. Thank you all for your support in this discussion, Jim and Antoin. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 19 mei 2017, om 15:40 heeft James Galvin het volgende geschreven

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-03.txt

e will start the formal adoption request for this document on the mailinglist as soon as that’s done. Since the launchphase document shepherd finished his writeup today, there are only some nits left for the authors to fix, so I expect this to be this/next week. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweev

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-03.txt

reads more like a problem statement with it’s proposed processes to solve issues of inconvenience rather than a document that defines a BCP or makes definitions. I’d say there is still work to do, and I can probably help with some definitions, but let’s first start the discussion on what

[regext] Agenda items for IETF99

this is a request to send your agenda items. Please send in items before next friday 30 June when we will post our preliminary agenda. Regards, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal

ssion? Regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 24 jun. 2017, om 18:05 heeft Roger D Carney het volgende geschreven: > Good Afternoon, > > The latest revision, 05, of the fee draft was just posted. > > I would like to invite ev

Re: [regext] Agenda items for IETF99

soon as possible. Another possibility is that we can still use our second (or first) hour for a work session. Is there any interest from document authors for this? Regards, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 23 jun. 2017, om 15:41 heeft

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

eric phase discovery like the suggestion for a Registry Mapping document. We expect that this will be discussed during the interim meeting next wednsesday. Please comment if any of my conclusions on the consensus is incorrect. Regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, N

[regext] Preparing for IETF 100

with one longer joint working/update session. Thanx, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ regext mailing list regext

[regext] Preparing for IETF 100

with one longer joint working/update session. Thanx, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ regext mailing list regext

Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

the desire to have a seperate working session. We will probably opt for one longer update session where the additional time will be dedicated to working items. Any thoughts? Any more agenda items? Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op

[regext] Preliminary agenda

working session. Please let us know what you think would be best. -If there are any more agenda items, please let us know. Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) IETF 100, Singapore, Agenda Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org Update session, first hour

Re: [regext] Preliminary agenda

, Antoin Verschuren Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org Update session, first hour: 1. Welcome and Introductions (5 minutes) i. Jabber scribe ii. Notes scribe iii. NOTE WELL 2. Existing Document Status i. Publication requested, status (1 minute) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft

[regext] REGEXT Minutes IETF 100

Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) IETF 100, Singapore, Meeting minutes Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org Existing Documents -- Launch Phase is in publication requested - all good so far. Fee Extension (Roger Carney

[regext] REGEXT Minutes IETF 100

Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) IETF 100, Singapore, Meeting minutes Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org Existing Documents -- Launch Phase is in publication requested - all good so far. Fee Extension (Roger Carney

Re: [regext] Request for Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token

James, Jim and I were going to send out a formal WGLC on this document, but we didn’t see a reply to this extensive review yet. What do you want us to do, wait for you to have treated Patrick’s comments, or consider them as part of WLC (Which may have a deadline)? Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin

Re: [regext] Request for Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-regext-change-poll

Antoin - -- - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 23 nov. 2017, om 06:42 heeft Patrick Mevzek het volgende geschreven: > Hello James and Kal, > > Here are my comments on the draft: > > The abstract is almost longer than the introd

[regext] Call for adoption: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag

adoption ends 20 December 2017. If there are no objections, and we receive enough consensus for adoption, the chairs will consider this document adopted. Thanks, Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim and Antoin. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc

[regext] Additional WGLC for draft-ietf-regext-launchphase

didn’t miss anything, we will make an additional WGLC. Since it’s holiday season, this WGLC will end January 5th. Please review the changes made to the document, and let us know before January 5th if you have any comments. Regards, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

, did you get any feedback on attendance? Regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 13 dec. 2017, om 14:46 heeft James Galvin het volgende geschreven: > I will attend. > > Jim > > > > On 7 Dec 2017, at 11:36, Roger D Ca

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag

have set up a pre-approvel for a draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00 document name. Regards, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 13 dec. 2017, om 14:44 heeft Antoin Verschuren het volgende geschreven: > Hi all, > > As

[regext] Preparing for IETF 101

session. Should this not be enough we can also request the ad-hoc conference room for an additional work session. Please start thinking about agenda items and let us know what you think before next friday when scheduling is due. regards, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6

[regext] Call for agenda items for IETF 101

week, after which we will push harder ;-). Regards, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ regext mailing list regext

[regext] IETF 101 agenda and POSSIBLE RESCEDULING

: Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) IETF 101, London, UK, Agenda Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org * Session I, Work session. Monday 2018-03-19 17:40 - 18:40 Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts (Roger Carney

Re: [regext] My review of draft-ietf-regext-org and draft-ietf-regext-org-ext

, be sure to voice your support during WGLC, and volunteer to be the document shepherd ;-). - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 > kr. > > Pieter > >> On 05 Jan 2018, at 03:47, Linlin Zhou wrote: >> >> Dear Pierter, >>

[regext] Preparing for Montreal

rest of our meeting to these topics if someone is willing to lead them. So please let us know if you have any agenda items. Jim and Antoin. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 ___ regext mailing list regext

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-org-02

and would show it, but a create or update could never set it?) Or is this local policy and do we need to give guidance to registries as to why, when and how to set this in a BCP? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 24 mei 2018, om 15:30 heeft Gou

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-org-02

> > > James Gould > Distinguished Engineer > jgo...@verisign.com > > 703-948-3271 > 12061 Bluemont Way > Reston, VA 20190 > > Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> > > On 5/25/18, 9:45 AM, "regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren" &

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-org-02

Registrant Contact Information: i...@ietf.org The justification being that I’ve seen that term used more in wishful presentations than privacyproxy. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 25 mei 2018, om 20:27 heeft Gould, James het volgende geschreven

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-org-02

not make things more orderly, and I could end up with a number of organization objects for my 1 organization in the same registry.. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 25 mei 2018, om 22:38 heeft Antoin Verschuren het volgende geschreven: > Hi Ja

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-org-02

se case, I would agree with you. It may look like overdesigning now if that were the only use case, but if we don’t add structure now, it will be hard to go back once unstructured objects are already populated. We took the challenge of doing more work now, to have quicker innovation later. And I

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-org-02

ant extra work, but third party dns-operators, ICANN related policy makers, RIR’s, registrants and plain IETF protocol guardians also have an equal voice in the IETF process, even though they don’t implement. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signa

[regext] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-03

Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-03 as Best Current Practice on behalf of the REGEXT working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-objec

Re: [regext] Preparing for Montreal

? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 25 mei 2018, om 17:25 heeft Roger D Carney het volgende geschreven: > Good Morning, > > Do we need to discuss our next documents in our regular meeting slot? > > For the regular meeting, I would

Re: [regext] Potential Topic for IETF-102: RDAP Search Capabilities

Scott, Sounds like an excellent idea. Since it’s new work, I assume we would like to have that discussion in our "work session”?, and Francisco is willing to lead that discussion? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 30 mei 2018, om 20:19

[regext] Preliminary agenda items for IETF 102 Montreal

, Agenda Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org * Session I, Work session. ?? 2h 1. Unhandled Namespaces (Jim Gould, 40 min.) 2. Registry Mapping (Roger Carney, 40 min.) 3. RDAP Search Capabilities and Authentication

Re: [regext] Proposed Revision to our Charter

scusion on the mailinglist and we will also have an item on our agenda in Montreal to discuss. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 13 jun. 2018, om 23:39 heeft Andrew Newton het volgende geschreven: > Thanks for the clarification, Roger.

[regext] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token-08

Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token-08 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-allocation-

[regext] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-regext-org-08

Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-org-08 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-org/ ___ regext mailing

[regext] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-07

Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-07 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-org-ext/ ___ r

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

version we resend to the IESG for reconsideration. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 > Op 3 sep. 2018, om 17:31 heeft Alexander Mayrhofer > het volgende geschreven: > > Hello everyone, > > tl;dr - i do agree with all what Patrick

[regext] Call for agenda items for Bangkok

publication process, and we will send a revised charter to the IESG next week. Is there any need for a work session now that most documents that needed discussion have proceeded and the new items have not been presented yet? Thanks, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

ee that that may be in scope by the text that you propose and that that would be undesirable? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

I personally think it does too. At least I wrote the text to include those documents in scope. But since I’m not a native english speaker it would help to know if others read that text the same way too. And confirm it’s not too broad in scope too. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items for Bangkok

from WG participants that couldn’t make Monday). - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 > Op 19 sep. 2018, om 23:40 heeft Gould, James > het volgende geschreven: > > We can add the login security extension (draft-gould-regext-login-security)

  1   2   3   >