Op 22 mei 2017, om 17:35 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> het volgende geschreven:
> I support the proposed changes. One minor note: Thank you Scott, >> draft-gould-change-poll (change to draft-ietf-regext-change-poll) >> Needs more reviewers and implementation. > > Implementation isn't a requirement for WG adoption or publications as a > Proposed Standard. As long as "needs ... implementation" means "nice to note > if it exists", OK. You’re right, but this was the comment made by the authors on what they still wanted to do before the document was ready for WGLC to set a date in our milestones. The document is already adopted by the WG, but it could do with more review and implementation experience beyond Verisign according to the authors. regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
