Op 14 sep. 2018, om 17:14 heeft Jody Kolker <jkol...@godaddy.com> het volgende geschreven: > > Since EPP and RDAP is included in this paragraph: > > << > The working group may also take on work to develop specifications that > describe the following types of information exchanged between entities > involved in Internet identifier registration that are using the RDAP or > EPP protocols: > >> > > Can this paragraph be updated to: > << > *Uniform representation formats for publishing local policy or > configuration options between registration entities. > *Data formats for files exchanged between registration entities. > *Technical guidance for registration processes between registration entities. > > >> > > The reason for changing the 2nd bullet “*Data formats for files exchanged > between registration entities that > need insertion in or extraction from EPP or RDAP.” Is that the data reports > are not downloaded via EPP or RDAP.
But the data is extracted from the database that is filled by EPP right? So it’s “EPP data”. True, you’ll need some imagination, and I also don’t know how to phrase that better right now, but I think that we want to prevent that f.e. invoice formats, advertising text, contracts or any other god knows what non protocol paper work between registries/registrars/registrants will be in scope as long as the entity uses some system that runs EPP or RDAP. Do you agree that that may be in scope by the text that you propose and that that would be undesirable? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
