Re: [regext] id_token parameter usage in rdap-openid

2022-01-25 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Harrison > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 12:04 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] id_token parameter usage in rdap-openid > > Caution: This email originated from outside the org

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-05.txt

2022-01-25 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the IETF. Title : Finding the Authoritative Registration Data (RDAP) Service Author : Marc Blanchet

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-05.txt

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
Hello, This draft should be fixing all issues (mostly editorial) regarding comments from IESG, LC and Area reviews, except two topics on which I will send an email as separate thread to the mailing list and the reviewers. So you shall see in the next mails my responses to the reviews with note

Re: [regext] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 30 sept. 2021 à 17:29, Russ Housley via Datatracker a > écrit : > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned ARTART reviewer for this Internet-Draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2021-09-30 > IETF LC End

Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 6 oct. 2021 à 15:08, Joel Halpern via Datatracker a > écrit : > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Ple

Re: [regext] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 29 nov. 2021 à 05:22, Robert Wilton via Datatracker a > écrit : > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To a

Re: [regext] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 29 nov. 2021 à 09:01, Lars Eggert via Datatracker a > écrit : > > Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and C

Re: [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 1 déc. 2021 à 14:37, Erik Kline via Datatracker a écrit > : > > Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC l

Re: [regext] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 1 déc. 2021 à 21:05, John Scudder via Datatracker a > écrit : > > John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 1 déc. 2021 à 05:39, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker a > écrit : > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC line

[regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-05: (with COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 29 nov. 2021 à 16:37, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker a > écrit : > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Merci Marc, for all your detailed answers and addressing the blocking DISCUSS point. I have now cleared my DISCUSS ballot, Good job by the authors, the shepherd, and the WG ! Regards -éric From: Marc Blanchet Date: Tuesday, 25 January 2022 at 23:25 To: Eric Vyncke Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf

Re: [regext] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread John Scudder
Hi Marc, Thanks, I just had a look at the diff. I have one further point to follow up on. > On Jan 25, 2022, at 5:22 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote: > >> Le 1 déc. 2021 à 21:05, John Scudder via Datatracker a >> écrit : […trimmed…] >> 3. In §5.3 you write, >> >>

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items IETF 113

2022-01-25 Thread Heather Flanagan
Hi all- I suspect we’d like a few minutes to talk about the status of the data dictionary and maybe discuss some ideas on avoiding policy implications. Heather Flanagan Spherical Cow Consulting   Translator of Geek to Human   h...@sphericalcowconsulting.com ‌ On Jan 24, 2022, 6:42 AM -0800

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items IETF 113

2022-01-25 Thread Steve Crocker
Heather, Your suspicion is confirmed :) Steve On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 6:36 PM Heather Flanagan < h...@sphericalcowconsulting.com> wrote: > Hi all- > > I suspect we’d like a few minutes to talk about the status of the data > dictionary and maybe discuss some ideas on avoiding policy implication

Re: [regext] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 25 janv. 2022 à 17:46, John Scudder a écrit : > > Hi Marc, > > Thanks, I just had a look at the diff. I have one further point to follow up > on. > >> On Jan 25, 2022, at 5:22 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote: >> >>> Le 1 déc. 2021 à 21:05, John Scudder via Datatracker a >>> écrit : > […trimm

[regext] draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis: Requiring secure transport for accessing bootstrap registries

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
Hello, As part of the reviews of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04 for Internet Standard, Benjamin Kaduk has commented as follows: Section 3 The RDAP Bootstrap Service Registries, as specified in Section 13 below, have been made available as JSON [RFC8259] objects, which can be retrieved v

Re: [regext] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 29 nov. 2021 à 10:31, Francesca Palombini via Datatracker > a écrit : > > Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-01-25 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Marc, No further comments from me here; I'll look for the separate threads indicated. Thanks, Ben ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext