> Le 1 déc. 2021 à 14:37, Erik Kline via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> a écrit > : > > Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [S5.2 & 13.2, comment] > > * It's probably better to refer to RFC 5952 for IPv6 text representations. > (If not, why not?) >
<MB>Done in -05</MB> > [S5.3, comment] > > * It might be good to place additional restrictions on the ordering of > AS numbers in the range syntax to require increasing order, ["101-202"], > and not allow ["202-101”] <MB>Done in -05</MB> Thanks, Regards, Marc. _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
