> Le 25 janv. 2022 à 17:46, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> a écrit : > > Hi Marc, > > Thanks, I just had a look at the diff. I have one further point to follow up > on. > >> On Jan 25, 2022, at 5:22 PM, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca> wrote: >> >>> Le 1 déc. 2021 à 21:05, John Scudder via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> a >>> écrit : > […trimmed…] >>> 3. In §5.3 you write, >>> >>> The array >>> always contains two AS numbers represented in decimal format >>> >>> Don’t you mean, “each array element always contains…“? Also, it appears >>> what it >>> really contains is two ASNs *separated by a hyphen*. >> >> <MB>Yes.</MB> > > 05 still has the text as quoted above. I’m not sure if that was deliberate, > or an oversight. In case it wasn’t clear, I was suggesting something along > these lines: > > OLD: > served by the base RDAP URLs found in the second element. The array > always contains two AS numbers represented in decimal format that > represents the range of AS numbers between the two elements of the > array, where values are in increasing order (e.g. 100-200, not > 200-100). A single AS number is represented as a range of two > > NEW: > served by the base RDAP URLs found in the second element. Each > element of the array > contains two AS numbers represented in decimal format, > separated by a hyphen, that > represents the range of AS numbers between the two AS numbers > (inclusive), where values are in increasing order (e.g. 100-200, not > 200-100). A single AS number is represented as a range of two > > (While I was at it I changed “between the two elements of the array”, which I > think was just wrong, and added “inclusive”.) > > If the text in 05 is exactly the way you want it, that’s OK, I think that for > practical purposes the ambiguity is unlikely to be a problem, especially > given the example (which is what I relied on to understand the meaning). I’m > just pointing this out in case it was an oversight.
Was not an oversight. I thought you were looking for an answer to your comment, so I responded “yes” ;-) Thanks for the text, I’ll add it to the -06, which I need to do anyway because I left two topics that need further discussion in the working group/ADs. Thanks, Marc. > > Regards, > > —John _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
