On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Jonathan Sailor wrote:
>GET RID OF IT!!
Yes, I second that.
>It takes too much room on some of our 640x480 screens.
>
>How about just [rh-list]
>or even just [list]?
or how about nothing? This is supposed to be a devel list, which
I must assume mean that technically profi
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Whats going on here RedHat? Please, can we get some RH response?
The new list software doesn't even insert the proper Reply-To line,
so to reply to the list you have to type its address by hand!
--
Alexander
Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/
_
The things that really annoy me are the fact that my rules are set up to put
anything sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] into my redhat folder but
whenever most people send stuff it goes straight into my inbox. This is a
real pig if I'm off.
___
Redhat-devel-l
How would I change the hostid for a Linux system?
Do you know if it is the same with a SUN system?
thanks,
Rick Parker,
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Rick Parker wrote:
> How would I change the hostid for a Linux system?
>
For single process or completely? There is a solution
attached for both, or change ethernet card :)
> Do you know if it is the same with a SUN system?
>
Gosh I dont remember how to do it offially with
On Suns the hostid is actually encoded on a EPROM chip in a socket on
the motherboard (though it is actually possible to switch these chips
from similar hardware). It is designed to be non-spoofable, though there
is a fairly easy way with dynamic libraries to hack it (not that I'm
advocating this)
The quoted message on the end of my last message wasn't the original
message I was trying to quote, though it was an interesting argument
internally about Linux in regards to one of our few dissenters.
Sorry about that...
- Matt
__
Didn't Intel have a solution that's built-into the cpu chip?
Steve B.
-- Original Message --
From: Matt Fahrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:27:55 -0400
>On Suns the hostid is actually encoded on a EPROM chip in a socket on
>the motherboa
Yes, but it was generally considered evil for privacy reasons and is
often disabled. It also is only in the newer chipsets so you couldn't
guarantee it to be consistently available.
- Matt
Steve Bagdon wrote:
>
> Didn't Intel have a solution that's built-into the cpu chi
The intel CPUID instruction was designed with the idea of providing a serial
no. for cpu's, however it's easily to get hold of even when it's switched
off. It's present in P2's later than the 266 Klamath and (IIRC) on all P2
Notebooks. It's also present on all PIII's and looks like there's no sign
At 12:49 +0400 28 Jun 2000, Alex Kanavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new list software doesn't even insert the proper Reply-To line,
Good! Mailing lists shouldn't overwrite Reply-To headers.
> so to reply to the list you have to type its address by hand!
No, I don't. I didn't touch the h
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> Mailing lists shouldn't overwrite Reply-To headers.
"``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful"
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
And the counter-argument:
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
Further inf
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 01:56:15PM -0500, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
> "``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful"
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> And the counter-argument:
>
> http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
Please, take the discuss
> "AK" == Alex Kanavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AK> On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>> Whats going on here RedHat? Please, can we get some RH response?
AK> The new list software doesn't even insert the proper Reply-To
AK> line, so to reply to the list you have to type its addre
Greetings,
In the abiword-0.7.9-3-i386.rpm that is up on Rawhide,
all files installed in /usr/share/AbiSuite/fonts/ and
/usr/share/AbiSuite/icons/ are mod 0640 but they need to be
0644 if non root users are to run the program.
--
James Muncy 377 Miami Tr. Bremen, IN 46506
219-546-4371 kb9mnx A
Also note the latest version is 7.10.
---Matt
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, james muncy wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> In the abiword-0.7.9-3-i386.rpm that is up on Rawhide,
> all files installed in /usr/share/AbiSuite/fonts/ and
> /usr/share/AbiSuite/icons/ are mod 0640 but they need
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, james muncy wrote:
> In the abiword-0.7.9-3-i386.rpm that is up on Rawhide,
> all files installed in /usr/share/AbiSuite/fonts/ and
> /usr/share/AbiSuite/icons/ are mod 0640 but they need to be
> 0644 if non root users are to run the program.
>
> --
> James Muncy 377 Miami Tr
Dear User Community,
As many of you have noticed, changes were made recently to the way the
redhat-devel-list is managed within Red Hat. The changes were made as
part of a migration plan to move all Red Hat managed lists to a new
server running the GNU Mailman mailing list manager software (see
List Manager wrote:
>
> It was our intention to migrate the list to the new server without
> impacting any of the members of the list. In fact the change should
Hopefully the other lists will go better :)
The devel list seams to be the best place to test it though.
> Community, we have reintro
strange my procmail recipe works fine:
I have two listed, just in case, but I think only the second one actually
works (I added it later because the first didn't).
:0
* ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RedHat
:0
* ^Sender:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RedHat
'tis amazing what a sudden understanding of regexp does for
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:31:13 +0100
>From: Steven Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Redhat-devel-list] subject line and stuff
>
>The things that really annoy me are the fact that my rules are set up to put
> Subject: Re: Recent changes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed Jun 28 2000 at 16:50, List Manager wrote:
> As many of you have noticed, changes were made recently to the way the
> redhat-devel-list is managed within Red Hat. The changes were made as
> of messages posted to the list. Two of these
In the quest to get a WaveLAN card to work on my 6.2beta laptop, it appears that I've
gone one step forward and two steps back. I've got the WaveLAN card working, but I've
lost cardbus support (Xircom RealPort card).
Short version:
* locate WaveLAN drivers, decompress into /usr/src/linux, comp
I don't think RedHat has released 6.3 yet. If you're looking for ISO
distributions of various flavors of Linux, though, take a look at
www.linuxberg.com or tucows. (I think the two sites are one and the
same)
You will find about 12 or 15 different distributions of Linux there
(Storm, RedHat, et
24 matches
Mail list logo
