On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> Mailing lists shouldn't overwrite Reply-To headers.
"``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful"
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
And the counter-argument:
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
Further information on the subject:
http://www.gnus.org/list-archives/ding/199802/msg00185.html (thread)
http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/reply-problem-list.txt
http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
Personal opinion: I'd prefer the list subject was left alone, and that
Reply-To: remain un-munged, with Mail-Reply-To: being used from DJB's
proposal above.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ Mercantec, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
