windows.
After reinstalling and updating my system again. I decided to get on a
couple of lists.
My want for 4.2 stems from my purchase of an ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon
8500DV AGP.
Yah I know..., but the card was just what I was looking for.
Here is the reason I am using this list and not the XFree86
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > Environment: gcc-2.96-71, glibc-2.2.1-2, binutils-2.10.1.0.2-2, freetype-1.3.1-7
And rawhide's freetype-2.0.1-4 will not build.
Using rawhide gcc-2.96-71, glibc-2.2-12, and kernel-2.4.0-0.43.12
(I'm have trouble building kernel-2.4.0-0.99.4)
Svante Signell wrote:
>
> Environment: gcc-2.96-71, glibc-2.2.1-2, binutils-2.10.1.0.2-2, freetype-1.3.1-7
>
> freetype-*2.0.1-40 not yet installed. Does this library supply include
> files at /usr/include/freetype2 resolving the problem below? If so,
> perhaps XFree86 sho
Environment: gcc-2.96-71, glibc-2.2.1-2, binutils-2.10.1.0.2-2, freetype-1.3.1-7
freetype-*2.0.1-40 not yet installed. Does this library supply include
files at /usr/include/freetype2 resolving the problem below? If so,
perhaps XFree86 should depend on that library too, in addition to
Glide3
On Wed Nov 15 2000 at 08:44, "Touloumtzis, Michael" wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 06:50:50PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It happens from to time X crashes or locks, then I telnet from another
> > box and after killing X I find I am unable to restore the console to
> > normal non graphi
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 06:50:50PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It happens from to time X crashes or locks, then I telnet from another
> box and after killing X I find I am unable to restore the console to
> normal non graphic mode. How can this be done?
I've not had to do this myself (cave
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > In the xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/memory.c
> > the mem_map_reserve function calling is the "old" style,
> Your patch introduces a new bug...
Yes, You've right, sorry, I'm rea
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Akos Szabo wrote:
> In the xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/memory.c
> the mem_map_reserve function calling is the "old" style,
Your patch introduces a new bug...
This chunk:
+#if LINUX_VERSION_
Hi!
I found a mistake in the XFree86 code:
In the xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/memory.c
the mem_map_reserve function calling is the "old" style, while from
2.4.0-test6 the calling methode is not the same.
(from linux-2.4.0-test10/drivers/char/drm/memory.c)
>
> It happens from to time X crashes or locks, then I telnet from another
> box and after killing X I find I am unable to restore the console to
> normal non graphic mode. How can this be done?
Did you try the reset command?
resizecons?
openvt might be useful too.
_
It happens from to time X crashes or locks, then I telnet from another
box and after killing X I find I am unable to restore the console to
normal non graphic mode. How can this be done?
--
Jean Francois Martinez
Project Independence: Linux for the Masses
http://www.in
On 30 Sep 2000, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)?
>
> XFree86-4.0.1-something.rpm
The old XFree had one server binary for each chipset. Th
Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)?
XFree86-4.0.1-something.rpm
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
41 days, 22 hours, 54 minutes, 16 seconds till we run away
i see that redhat 7.0 uses XFree86 4.0.1 but i also see servers from the
old XFree86 release there.
my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
> Good day,
>
> rpm -ivh /tmp/XFree86-3.3.6-20.src.rpm
> modified SPECS/XFree86.spec for accept i686 archi recompilation
> rpm -bs /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/XFree86.specs
> rpm --rebuild --target=i686 --clean
> /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/XFree86-3.3.6-20.src.rpm >build.log
Good day,
rpm -ivh /tmp/XFree86-3.3.6-20.src.rpm
modified SPECS/XFree86.spec for accept i686 archi recompilation
rpm -bs /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/XFree86.specs
rpm --rebuild --target=i686 --clean
/usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/XFree86-3.3.6-20.src.rpm >build.log 2>&1
wait some minute. Appears to
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 21:32:19 -0400
>From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm
>
>I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and eve
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> XFree86 uses a different driver system. Drivers are implemented
> as loadable modules; there is only one server. (Both that server
> and the drivers are in the XFree86 package.)
>
Thank you for breaking that down for me. This is my first time messing
w
Frank Hale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and everything went okay. Here
> is a listing of the RPMS it generated. Am I missing something, where are
> the XServer RPMS? For instance I don't see a MACH_64 XServer which I
> need to run my AT
I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and everything went okay. Here
is a listing of the RPMS it generated. Am I missing something, where are
the XServer RPMS? For instance I don't see a MACH_64 XServer which I
need to run my ATI card. Hopefully there is a logical explanation.
-rw-rw-r--
Kevin Ford wrote:
>
> http://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/rawhide/1.0/i386/XByName.html
>
> These are already precompiled.. Might have dependencies... Source RPM..
>
> ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/rawhide/1.0/SRPMS/SRPMS/XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm
>
> You might want to get
> Does anyone know where I can get XFree86 4.0.1 rpms? Rpmfind doesn't have
> any.
>
I've been pulling the src.rpm from the pinstripe collection at ftp.redhat.com
You may wish to get xconfigurator from there too.
___
Redhat
http://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/rawhide/1.0/i386/XByName.html
These are already precompiled.. Might have dependencies... Source RPM..
ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/rawhide/1.0/SRPMS/SRPMS/XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm
You might want to get a few other source files while you're there...
Kevin
Tom Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to display my ignorance, but can you elaborate on your comment:
> "You may just want to upgrade to upgrade to 6.9...". Do you mean there
> is an upgrade path from RedHat 6.2 to a 6.9 version? If so, where and how?
Same as to a normal release. Downlo
Craig Kelley wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know where I can get XFree86 4.0.1 rpms? Rpmfind doesn't have
> > any.
>
> Pinstripe has them (in the beta/ directory of your favorite mirror). You
> may just want to upgrade t
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can get XFree86 4.0.1 rpms? Rpmfind doesn't have
> any.
Pinstripe has them (in the beta/ directory of your favorite mirror). You
may just want to upgrade to 6.9 while you're at it (otherwise you'll need
t
Does anyone know where I can get XFree86 4.0.1 rpms? Rpmfind doesn't have
any.
Cheers
Steve
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
XFree86-3.3.6-20 took 70 minutes on a 300MHz PII with 192 Meg RAM and SCSI
disks at 40MHz. XFree86-4.0.1-0.36 took 144 minutes on the same computer.
John Summerfield writes:
> > About how long do you think it would take to build XFree86 3.3.6 on a
> > PIII 500 with 256 megs of ram?
> About how long do you think it would take to build XFree86 3.3.6 on a
> PIII 500 with 256 megs of ram? I'm talking about the src.rpm's?
>
> I'm just trying to get a good rough estimate of the time it will take so
> I can plan my work accordingly.
>
I don
About how long do you think it would take to build XFree86 3.3.6 on a
PIII 500 with 256 megs of ram? I'm talking about the src.rpm's?
I'm just trying to get a good rough estimate of the time it will take so
I can plan my work accordingly.
hello
i tried to set up X but all i got was a black screen. Using the SVGA server
from Red Hat 6.2 (-20 i think) fixed the problem.
also, the version of xf86config appears to create a file for XFree86 4.0 which
doesn't work when using a server from XFree86 3.3.6.
Ev
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency.
> >
> > They shouldn'
non-ia64, and it should be
> >
> > That file is in there.
> >
> > I'll try rebuilding it with my current /usr/X11* hidden,
> > but It shouldn't see any thing in there should it?
> >
> > I'm not sure how the find-deps stuff works and XFree
I forgot to add this log :(
-Thoams
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > > And the Mesa and XFree package
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency.
>
> They shouldn't - is this explicitly, or did it ju
Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote:
> > > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
>
> I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> That file is now in the Xconfigurator package.
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote:
> > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
I built this with r
Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote:
>
> I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not
> (or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that
> includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2.
> I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but
> they seem not to work. The
When I upgraded to the latest rawhide only Xconfigurator works. I was
previously using
NVIDIA_GLX and NVIDIA_KERNEL rpms to use the 2d nvidia driver but now I
can't load any modules. When I went back to XFree86-4.0-0.30 I still
couldn't load any modules and all the keywords in the
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:41:42PM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
> That file is now in the Xconfigurator package.
Speaking of which, Xconfigurator.spec and anaconda.spec omit to require
that a recent version of kudzu-devel be installed (with 0.36 you get
errors like 'CLASS_MONITOR undeclared'). With
That file is now in the Xconfigurator package.
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote:
>
> Welcome :)
> This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
>
>
> --
> Piotr "Charvel"
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, James M. Rogers wrote:
>Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 09:22:06 -0700
>From: James M. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2
>
>You don't need an RPM for XFree 4.0
Right, but this is RedHat Li
Welcome :)
This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
--
Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP & GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Uin: 20873695
GCM d- s-:- a-- C++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+ N+++ !o !K w--- !O M V- PS+ PE
grade.
Good Luck!
Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote:
>
> I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not
> (or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that
> includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2.
> I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but
> they seem not to work
I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not
(or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that
includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2.
I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but
they seem not to work. There are unsatisfied
dependencies which relates only to RawHide.
Has
i386 build OK, but not i686. an earlier 0.8? version did
...
+ rm -f /var/tmp/XFree86-root/usr/X11R6/lib/libz.a
+ cp xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/XF86Config /var/tmp/XFree86-root/etc/X11/
+ pushd /var/tmp/XFree86-root/usr/X11R6/bin
/var/tmp/XFree86-root/usr/X11R6/bin /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
Svante Signell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> In the latest rawhide 2000-03-27, the XFree86.src.rpm version is
> 4.0-0.2 while the RPMS are version 3.3.6-20.
... snip ...
> BTW: The 4.0 version does not compile for me
You have your answer. ;)
Source RPMs that actually compile should
In the latest rawhide 2000-03-27, the XFree86.src.rpm version is
4.0-0.2 while the RPMS are version 3.3.6-20. Should the .src.rpm still
be 3.3.6? What about supplying both 3.3.6 and 4.0?
BTW: The 4.0 version does not compile for me, 3.3.6-20 (from 6.2)
does. Nice to see kernel-2.3.99
>
> First, my comments extend from other issues and are not specific to the
> XFree86 releases, but to most packages overall. I have noticed a trend
> with Mandrake, or so it appears and if I am wrong being shown how I am
> wrong will definitely go a long way to changing my opi
your question, but it looks like my mail server is hoarding
about half the messages in the thread to deliver in a month or so
(!#%^ ATHM!) much like it has the preceeding pissing contest.
At 18:29 3/14/00 +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>For those who complained, XFree86 4.0 packages are
> know the rules as well as I do. These are *MY* opinions and are
> therefore seperate from Red Hat. Did I post from a Red Hat account? No,
Settle down folks.
You DID sound like a Red Hat person, and you DID claim Red Hat allegiance.
I've seen people clearly representing another company doing
Vandoorselaere Yoann wrote:
>
> Ohh, Unreal Tournament run fine on many machine that i know including
> debian and mandrake, i suppose it run fine on redhat too.
>
It's been installed on 3 PII 400 to 450s with 128MB Of RAM, and 2 AMD
k6-2 333 and 400s They all puke with "Segmenation Fault (co
I apologize. I forgot to give the URL.
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/
--
David D.W. Downey - Red Hat Technical Engineer
Assistant Site Manager - http://www.linuxnewbie.com
Resume - http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=96113
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe
Brian Patterson wrote:
>
> Whats DJGPP?
DJGPP is the DOS port of GCC. It aslso has G++, Fortran, LISP, and
Pascal IIRC.
Also, there is B20 (now B21 I believe) for writing Windows apps using
GCC)
--
David D.W. Downey - Red Hat Technical Engineer
Assistant Site Manager -
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is my last mail on this topic.
>
> Yes, it is out of line. I run a hybrid network here consisting of
> Win98SE clients, Windows 2000 clients and Red Hat Linux 6.1 servers
> handling mail, LDAP, NIS, NFS, Sybase, mysql, and PostgreSQL. The wi
> Ohh and is this also out of line ?
>
> This is your sent mail headers :
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
Yes, it is out of line. I run a hybrid network here consisting of
Win98SE clients, Windows 2000 c
Arright. Take this "who whizzed in whose wheaties" somewhere else.
Neither of you are making your respective companies look any better
doing this, and I'm getting personally embarrased to say I'm a RH
user.
But the question still stands - what's the timeline for 4.0?
I downloaded the non-packag
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Wooa,
> > for a Microsoft certified person i think you say more than you know :
> >
>
> It's just a cert. Just a cert. Do I work for microsoft? No. Therefore
> THIS comment is out of line as well. And you claim, *I'M* fighting the
> co
> That's you who started the debate...
> feel free to continue mailling me in private.
>
OK, let us continue this in private.
> A statement of experience ?
> Are you kidding ?
I'll ignore that.
>
> I think you have not so many mandrake experience to say such a thing.
> (quoting you : mandr
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > First,
>
> > So, we do far more than compiling them.
> >
> I will not address the first, since this will lend to a long and drawn
> out debate covering many different issues that are better served outside
> of a public forum.
That's you who
Frederic Lepied wrote:
>
> "David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> > releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
> >
>
> What makes you
> First,
> So, we do far more than compiling them.
>
I will not address the first, since this will lend to a long and drawn
out debate covering many different issues that are better served outside
of a public forum.
> Second,
> we do not insult redhat on our list, please be polite and do so.
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
First,
we have 2 dedicated XFree developper doing our X package
and one of them is working full time on X.
They are
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
>
What makes you said that ? Every release of XFree86 that I have done
has been te
Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
I know for a fact that Red Hat tests their RPMs before releasing them.
If they come in for contrib, then you are usually on your own as to
whether they work or not.
[EMA
I noticed on
http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/XByName.html
That the new xfree RPMs are available for Mandrake
Are there any yet for RedHat?
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Yes, the should work fine.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 01:15:39PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> Do the bianries for XFree86-3.3.6 from the RH 6.2beta or from rawhide
> are compatible with the libraries from RH 6.1? Can I just download
> and install them to run them?
&g
Do the bianries for XFree86-3.3.6 from the RH 6.2beta or from rawhide
are compatible with the libraries from RH 6.1? Can I just download
and install them to run them?
Thanks.
Romildo
--
Prof. José Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Departamento de Computação
Universidade Federal d
> handled via xfs. Using an explicit font path isn't really being
> supported anymore. Therefore, it makes sense that the XFree packages
> require xfs.
The Xservers should depend on xfs. Not XFree86 itself.
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 08:42:21PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
>
> > I've got a somewhat stripped down box that I'm using as a firewall; I'd like
> > to have XFree86 on the box so I can run the X version of emacs over ssh.
You don't need XFree86 for that,
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> Why does XFree86 require XFree86-xfs?
The current way the RHL XFree packages are set up is that X fonts are
handled via xfs. Using an explicit font path isn't really being
supported anymore. Therefore, it makes sense that the XFree
Why does XFree86 require XFree86-xfs?
I've got a somewhat stripped down box that I'm using as a firewall; I'd like
to have XFree86 on the box so I can run the X version of emacs over ssh.
However, including XFree86 required including XFree86-xfs, and that seems
kinda sill
72 matches
Mail list logo
