Abd Shukur Bin Sharif wrote:
> I have same problem. I needs help please.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build a small distribution of RH 7.2 here on a
local box
without much success.
In my directory /inetcd, I have a Redhat/RPMS and Redhat/base
directory
w
>
> Let me guess, you're not using RHL72, but rather something that has
> bash1 instead of bash2 as the default. Or at least, that's my guess
> from a quick glance. I'd suggest using bash2 and seeing if it has
> better results.
I don't think that Red Hat ever had a package called bash1 (there
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Anth Courtney wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm trying to build a small distribution of RH 7.2 here on a local box
> without much success.
>
> In my directory /inetcd, I have a Redhat/RPMS and Redhat/base directory
> which contain all my rpms and the hdlist results from running ge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did anyone know if there will be new graphical installer in next version of
> Red Hat Linux?
> Anaconda must be better.
>
> Please comments about anaconda.
Anaconda is not that bad but it is not state of the art. It has not caught
with
Lizard, the revolutionary (in 19
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote:
>
> Go back and re-read what I wrote. That doesn't do it.
>
> Using the comps file allows you to choose *different* packages for install,
> but must be specified in the ks.config file. What I am going to acheive
> is the ability to
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:18:57AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > And then in ks.cfg, add:
> > %packages
> > @ Custom Package 1
>
> No, you can't.
>
> How do I install one version of package on one cluster, and version
>on another?
So
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:46:10AM -0600, Tony Seward wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:18:57AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote:
> > > > Like many medium to large installations, we have some process in
> >
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:18:57AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote:
> > > Like many medium to large installations, we have some process in
> > > place to "roll" (i.e. install and configure) machines in an
> > > a
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:18:57AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote:
> > Like many medium to large installations, we have some process in
> > place to "roll" (i.e. install and configure) machines in an
> > automatic or semi-automatic process. Currently
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote:
> Like many medium to large installations, we have some process in
> place to "roll" (i.e. install and configure) machines in an
> automatic or semi-automatic process. Currently we use a combination
> of kickstart and "clustering" scri
I see that the beta is running 2.4.0-ac9... what was the solution to the
anaconda problem?
Thanks,
-Eric
> > Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Pretty sure it's not a problem with the process being forked - we
> > > commented out "probe" and it failed on the next process it trie
Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pretty sure it's not a problem with the process being forked - we
> commented out "probe" and it failed on the next process it tried to
> fork.
>
> Test python scripts worked fine when the system was booted normally with
> this kernel (i.e. off the hard
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Jeff Pitman wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> In particular, it gives ugly backtraces if you have a kickstart file that
> worked just fine with RedHat 6.2.
> Incompatible changes are bad enough, but these failures should be more
> graceful and give more clue what's wrong
> From: "Jeff Pitman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:15:53 -0600
>
> If you want to use DHCP, my experience with the new anaconda is to just
> leave out the network line. Then, it automatically falls back on DHCP as
> the method to get it's IP.
>
> -
> Now it's complaining
-Original Message-
In particular, it gives ugly backtraces if you have a kickstart file that
worked just fine with RedHat 6.2.
Incompatible changes are bad enough, but these failures should be more
graceful and give more clue what's wrong.
Where can I get information on the format of a k
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> In particular, it gives ugly backtraces if you have a kickstart file that
> worked just fine with RedHat 6.2.
>
> Incompatible changes are bad enough, but these failures should be more
> graceful and give more clue what's wrong.
I second that motio
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > The problem has been that genhdlist barfs on 4.x RPMs.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm feeling real ignorant here. I've got the latest instimage and I
> > can't figure out where to drop my customized comps file. Should I ass
> From: Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:17:27 +0300 (EEST)
>
> Comps go to RedHat/base, as before. hdlist is also still
> required. Genhdlist can be found in anaconda-runtime package
> (IIRC).
>
> Custom comps and generated genhdlist work fine with me w/ 4.x RPM
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> The problem has been that genhdlist barfs on 4.x RPMs.
>
> Anyway, I'm feeling real ignorant here. I've got the latest instimage and I
> can't figure out where to drop my customized comps file. Should I assume that
> the comps file is obsolete; th
> From: Jeff Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:22:15 -0600
>
> I'm not sure where the docs are for anaconda, but, I would highly recommend
> using the latest instimage from rawhide or pinstripe or whatever their calling
> it now a days. I've had troubles with the older one
Hi,
Just removing the KDE workstation option in the comps file will cause
anaconda to complain and die. You have to change gui.py and/or text.py
and/or installclass.py depending on what you want to do.
To define your own, you will have to change installclass.py (derive your
own class from Instal
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:24:13AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> Where would I find documentation on anaconda? I need to do kickstart network
> installations and the older installer which I've been using is now failing
> me thanks to RPM4.0.
The docs on kickstart are in the manual:
http://w
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, you wrote:
>
> Where would I find documentation on anaconda? I need to do kickstart network
> installations and the older installer which I've been using is now failing
> me thanks to RPM4.0.
I'm not sure where the docs are for anaconda, but, I would highly recommend
usin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I copied the anaconda directory over to to misc/src/anaconda in the
> RedHat tree, and ran a make install. I got the following errors:
[ bunch of error messages trimmed]
> There is a pci.h in /usr/include/kudzu/ so I also tried changing the
> #include
Matt,
Thanks. That worked nicely and anaconda runs fine in test mode now.
I copied the anaconda directory over to to misc/src/anaconda in the
RedHat tree, and ran a make install. I got the following errors:
awk: cmd. line:2: fatal: cannot open file `kudzu.spec' for reading (No
such file
or dire
This was on retail ($32 ) 6.2
distribution. I've given up.
From: Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anaconda 7 bug
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Red Hat developer's list
What kind of problems?
Matt
On Wed, Aug 09
It's a binary module, you have to run 'make' first.
Matt
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 02:22:38PM -0400, Atul Pokharel wrote:
> hi,
> When I run anaconda from /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/anaconda-6.2.2 using
>
> ./anaconda -t -T -m ftp://path/to/redhat/dir
>
> I can go as far as the "Installation Typ
What kind of problems?
Matt
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:46:08PM +0200, XosÉ Vázquez wrote:
> hi,
>
> anaconda 7 (redhat beta 7) has problems
> with the Xserver (savage_4) on the IBM Netfinity 4500R.
> Redhat 6.2 is ok.
___
Redhat-devel-lis
Lionel Cons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> The Anaconda sources used to be in i386/misc/src/anaconda but they
> don't seem to be here anymore, where are they now?
In the anaconda source RPM.
Bill
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
If you are referring to Red Hat Linux 6.2 there is an anaconda source RPM
distributed.
Michael Fulbright
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
if you modify comps file, don't forget to do 'genhdlist' also check that
there are no double entries of the same package in RPMS.
p.s. plz, html off.
> Tyler Smith wrote:
>
> Hello, I am trying to install RH 6.2, and after nearly 10 tries and
> using the update disks provided on www.redhat.
What install method are you using? I'm guessing hard drive. Make
sure you copied all the RPMS - it looks like you're missing at least
the indexhtml package.
Matt
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 01:54:40PM -0700, Tyler Smith wrote:
> Hello, I am trying to install RH 6.2, and after nearly 10 tries and u
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > As to "instant firewalling"; any program which claims to provide instant
> > firewalling is not going to provide well for a lot of cases. Firewalls
>
> You may be suprised. Lokkit seems to be handling all the 'end user' cases
> thrown at it rather well. Certainly it cover
> To be honest, I'd find it to be a major PITA if every
> machine I installed had to okay through a ppp config post install
I don't think that's really what they're getting at. You don't need to
make everything get configured at install time, just give an option so
that it can, or better yet, a G
> As to "instant firewalling"; any program which claims to provide instant
> firewalling is not going to provide well for a lot of cases. Firewalls
You may be suprised. Lokkit seems to be handling all the 'end user' cases
thrown at it rather well. Certainly it covers home user dialup, screening
[ Friday, February 11 2000 ] had JF Martinez saying:
> I have been using RedHat since the Halloween release and I have never
> felt the individual user was treated adequately. When I look at
> Anaconda's source code I see nothing is provided for PPP
> configuration, Sound cards or instant firewal
While not in the first reboot, Redhat does provide the control panel
and linuxconf to configure PPP and soundconfig to configure sound.
It doesn't come with instant firewalling but there are quite a few
such packages you can download of the net as RPMS.
Redhat cannot be everything to everybody.
37 matches
Mail list logo
