[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Did anyone know if there will be new graphical installer in next version of
> Red Hat Linux?
> Anaconda must be better.
>
> Please comments about anaconda.

Anaconda is not that bad but it is not state of the art.  It has not caught
with
Lizard, the revolutionary (in 1999) installer from Caldera and it is also
below
what Mandrake and Suse are doing.

Let's see a few shortcomings:

1) Mouse selection: RedHat does not give to the user the oportunity to check
if all the buttons are working.  I also failed to be offered the choice of
generic (ie no MS) Intellimouse.  Mine is LogiTech.

2)  Grub.   Grub allows real support of non US keyboards and Mandrake installs

the corresponding keyboard map.  RedHat installer does not install
another keyboard map so if you are unfortunate enough to be french and need
to pass mem=128m at boot time
you have to type ,e,=&é_,

3) Package selection.   Two days ago I upgraded a P200 MMX I noticed a few
tasty
packages and proceeded to install.   It stood for a looooooong time (at least
10minutes)
before telling me it had not enough space.  I know this is only a 200 MMX but
I don't
think adding the sizes of 500 packages plus size of database plus size of
installer should
need 10 minutes.  I know, I know this is not so simple since in order to
ensure all partitions
have enough space the ionstaller has to check individual files but there must
be a smarter
and faster way.  Like  a  precalculated database telling how much of such
package will go
under cmmon ùmount points like /var, /usr, /home.
Also when upgrading you have the choice between upgrading and not upgrading
package.   You
cannot remove a package from old installation.


Compared to Mandrake there are other shortcomings: installer does not handle
conflicts so RedHat
cannot ship alternative printing systems or mail agents.   This is unfortunate
since for old timers Redhat
has to ship sendmail and LPRng while the sensible choice when you don't have
legacy are postfix and
cups.

Installation does not self tune to available disk space (Mandrake does), there
is no hierarchy of
packages (some are more important than others).  There is no a "recommended"
installation class
where user doesn't know enough so better trust the installer for making
sensible choices like what booter, mail system or  printing system are the
best.

4)  X configuration is good but there are two things I miss: One is that
sometimes you get a usable screen
who is far smaller than monitor size and/or not centered.  This can be fixed
with xvidtune and then editing
XF86Config but Suse installer invokes a TCL application who is far more
palatable than xvidtune and in
addition edits XF86Config.  (Don't forget a new user does not know about this
file).  End result is that
a Suse user ends installation with an optimal screen and the RedHat with a
suboptimal one.  I also miss
Mandrake's feature allowing to change resolution and color depth on the fly
(thiis is not an installer but a
run time feature).  Very nice when going from working activity to action games
who could be too slow
on 24 bpp.

5)  When you end a Redhat installation you don't really have a working box.
It doesn't print, you cannot
connect to your ISP, you probably have unneeded daemons and other things I
forget.  Of course this can
be done later but my experience is that it takes longer since the user will be
chasing for the tools instead
of being prompted.  Also if config is happening at installtime it can do
things like installing samba if user tells he will be using an SMB printer.
Contrarily to RedHat users the Mandrake and Suse users can really start
working as soon they end installation.   One area where RedHat is better is
sound configuration since
at first boot it detected my card, prompted me for configuring it and I had
sound working from my first
login.  Mandrake users are not so fortunate.

For the reasons given above I really think the ideal combo would be Redhat
with a Mandrake installer
BTW Mandrake installer is GPL and Mandrake "stole" from RedHat three years
ago.  Time to get even
isn't it?


--
Jean Francois Martinez

Project Independence http://independence.seul.org
Because Linux should be for everyone





_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Reply via email to