hi!
I'm maintaining a RedHat 6.2 installation CD with
all the RH updates plus some extra packages for
our internal use.
This has been going fine up until now, when the RPM
database and headers changed with the rpm 3->4 change.
I can generate a new hdlist by using the genhdlist from
the redhat 7
Frank Hale wrote:
>
> RPM 4 depends on db3-devel? Where do I get that?
>
Sorry I found it.
--
ICQ: 7205161
http://sapphire.sourceforge.net - Yet another X11 Window Manager
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECT
RPM 4 depends on db3-devel? Where do I get that?
--
ICQ: 7205161
http://sapphire.sourceforge.net - Yet another X11 Window Manager
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
>
> > On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
> > > distribution? Should I
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> > >
> > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
> > >
> >
> > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
> > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05?
>
> Go with RPM 4
> >
> > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
> >
>
> So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
> distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05?
>
Note: Matt's pointed out that Pinstripe used RPM 4.
I've downloade
> > >
> > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
> > >
> >
> > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
> > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05?
>
> Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
> >
>
> So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
> distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05?
Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.05 will *n
>
> If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
>
So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05?
Thanks,
Frank
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:/
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:15:36AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> > If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized
> > distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right
> > now they are built with RPM 3.04.
> >
>
> If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure
> If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized
> distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right
> now they are built with RPM 3.04.
>
If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
It might be a useful test of RPM 4, but I'd not expect it to add anything
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized
> distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right
> now they are built with RPM 3.04.
I've yet to have any issues. The biggest change between 3.04 and 4.00 is the
database handling where it
If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized
distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right
now they are built with RPM 3.04.
Thanks,
Frank
=
ICQ: 7205161
http://sapphire.sourceforge.net - Another X11 Window Manager
__
Do You
At 01:45 24.08.00, John Summerfield wrote:
> > > As I recall, not all are happy with 3.0.5. I found it wouldn't build
> an rpm
> > on
> > > my newly-installed RHL 6.2 (couldn't find the files) so reverted to
> 3.0.4
> > > which built the same rpm without any problem.
> >
> > Did you test this w
> > As I recall, not all are happy with 3.0.5. I found it wouldn't build an rpm
> on
> > my newly-installed RHL 6.2 (couldn't find the files) so reverted to 3.0.4
> > which built the same rpm without any problem.
>
> Did you test this with the latest (3.0.5-9, for example) RPM v3?
[summer@pos
> As I recall, not all are happy with 3.0.5. I found it wouldn't build an rpm on
> my newly-installed RHL 6.2 (couldn't find the files) so reverted to 3.0.4
> which built the same rpm without any problem.
Did you test this with the latest (3.0.5-9, for example) RPM v3?
Certain older versions h
> Jens-Ulrik Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, I give in... this seems to be one of the better kept secrets in
> > distribution land, though I know it has been discussed here before.
> >
> > How can I upgrade smoothly from rpm-3 to rpm-4 (withou
> > How can I upgrade smoothly from rpm-3 to rpm-4 (without downloading an
> > iso cdrom image, and preferably without a reboot)? The question might
> > have been where can one get a rpm-4 rpm in rpm-3 format.
> >
> > If someone can give me or point me to
Jens-Ulrik Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I give in... this seems to be one of the better kept secrets in
> distribution land, though I know it has been discussed here before.
>
> How can I upgrade smoothly from rpm-3 to rpm-4 (without downloading an
>
Ok, I give in... this seems to be one of the better kept secrets in
distribution land, though I know it has been discussed here before.
How can I upgrade smoothly from rpm-3 to rpm-4 (without downloading an
iso cdrom image, and preferably without a reboot)? The question might
have been where
Welcome ;)
After building package by rpm 4.0 I try to come into package and got:
-- Could not parse --
and later mc show only
/INFO
CONTENTS.cpio
HEADER
INSTALL
UPGRADE
Any patch to extfs/rpm ? ;) I use latest mc 4.5.51
--
Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP & GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTE
"Edward S. Marshall" wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
> >
> > http://home.xnet.com/~emarshal/rpm/
> >
> > If you're brave, go ahead and give them a try; as soon as I've had a
> > chance to test them, I'll let everyone know.
>
> Just as an FYI, the upgrade went semi-
Here is what I did to convert to rpm-4:
1. Tried to patch from "Gene C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to include v4 in
rpm-3.0.4-7: Did not build any longer, since I'm now using
glibc-2.1.90.
2. Tried the same patch with rpm-3.1-0.21 from an earlier rawhide:
Unfortunately a
Svante Signell wrote:
I can't see it. where is rpm-4??
>
> www.rpm.org
>
> hth
>
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Xos=C9=5FV=E1zquez?= writes:
> > hi,
> >
> >
> > where can i find the rpm4 sources(tar.gz) ??
> >
> > The files at ftp.r
www.rpm.org
hth
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Xos=C9=5FV=E1zquez?= writes:
> hi,
>
>
> where can i find the rpm4 sources(tar.gz) ??
>
> The files at ftp.rpm.org are very _old_ <= 3.x
>
> regards and thanks,
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
--
To
I built rpm v4 from CVS tree and then installed the rpm v4 packages from
rawhide only
to encounter the exact problems you describe with names and such being
screwed up.
To fix I went back to the CVS source did make install again to replace the
rpm installed
by the rawhide packages, and did a rp
OK, no warentee ... use at your own risk.
The patch below will enable rpm-3 to handle SRPMS built with rpm-4. I have NOT
tried to handle binary installs!! However, this will enable someone to install
and rebuild from source.
rpm-4 is NOT considered stable enough for production use (yet
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 11:27:23AM -0500, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
> Just as an FYI, the upgrade went semi-smoothly. Here's what I discovered:
Thanks, but it's too much hassle for me right now. I'll give it a quick
try tonight on the test machine that gets RedHat reinstalled at least
daily. ;)
hi,
where can i find the rpm4 sources(tar.gz) ??
The files at ftp.rpm.org are very _old_ <= 3.x
regards and thanks,
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
>
> http://home.xnet.com/~emarshal/rpm/
>
> If you're brave, go ahead and give them a try; as soon as I've had a
> chance to test them, I'll let everyone know.
Just as an FYI, the upgrade went semi-smoothly. Here's what I discovered:
- you
Rudi Chiarito wrote:
> Autoconf and automake are OK, while libtool is v1.3.4 (same as RawHide).
Just for fun, I've built an RPM of RPM 4.0 from the pristine 4.0-0.33 SRPM
using RPM 3.x (you know, that still confuses me ;-) and placed the results
at:
http://home.xnet.com/~emarshal/rpm/
I
ersion 3.1
Trying to rebuild rpm-4 straight from the CVS repository:
[root@ciccillo rpm]# ./autogen.sh
You need to install:
libtool-1.3.5
autoconf-2.13
automake-1.4
Autoconf and automake are OK, while libtool is v1.3.4 (same as RawHide).
--
"We make a special art
Rudi Chiarito wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 11:01:49PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > How is one supposed to upgrade to packages built with rpm-4.0 using
> > rpm-3.x?, especially rpm-4.0. Any binaries of v 4.0 available somewhere?
>
> I was dumb enough to try als
Svante Signell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> How is one supposed to upgrade to packages built with rpm-4.0 using
> rpm-3.x?, especially rpm-4.0. Any binaries of v 4.0 available somewhere?
/RedHat/instimage/usr/bin/rpm is there, at least.
Bill
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTEC
enjade SRPM).
> > rpm -qp /mnt/sdc3/rpm-4.0-0.33.i386.rpm
> only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM
> query of /mnt/sdc3/rpm-4.0-0.33.i386.rpm failed
> Same problem with rpm-3.1-x.
I was dumb enough to try also rpm-4*.src.rpm and rpm-3.1*.src.rpm
How is one supposed to upgrade to packages built with rpm-4.0 using
rpm-3.x?, especially rpm-4.0. Any binaries of v 4.0 available somewhere?
> rpm -q rpm
rpm-3.0.4-7
> rpm -qp /mnt/sdc3/rpm-4.0-0.33.i386.rpm
only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM
query of /mnt
36 matches
Mail list logo
