> On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote: > > > > > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) > > > > > > > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own > > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05? > > Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.05 will *not* be able to handl > e > merely based on the version numbers! For example, for some reason, I couldn' > t > get the XF86 RPM to install unless i had RPM 4, because 3.05 whined and said > "Can't install packages with version numbers >= 3..." (I guess I can do a > force, but I really hate that...) 3.0.5 is supposed to handle those; the problem I had with two versions is they can't find the files for some rpms when building them. That's why I suggest 3.0.4. Using rpm 4 on RHL 6.2 just adds one more certainty when something breaks. _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
