Re: basename()?

2000-08-23 Thread Matt Nelson
On 23 Aug 2000, Alan Shutko wrote: > Matt Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Btw, even using Emacs to read the Emacs Info page, I *still* wouldn't have > > been able to figure out the above command. > > Not surprising, since the above invocation is a hack to

Re: basename()?

2000-08-23 Thread Matt Nelson
On 23 Aug 2000, Alan Shutko wrote: > Matt Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How do I read Info pages with Emacs? > > alias info="emacs -q -f info-standalone" Now THAT'S what I call "intuitive". Btw, even using Emacs to read the Emac

Re: basename()?

2000-08-23 Thread Matt Nelson
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >> In other words, take a text doc, convert it to a single HTML > > >> page, put some links in it there and there, a TOC, and INDEX, and > > >> a bunch of anchors and you've got basically w

A Few Suggestions

2000-04-06 Thread Matt Nelson
Having just upgraded a couple of systems to Red Hat 6.2, let me compliment the developers for a job well done. I do, however, have a suggestion for improving the user-friendliness of the installer. Here is the crux of the issue: Philosophically, An "upgrade" of a system basically involves repla

Re: updated redhat distribution / installation cdroms

1999-10-26 Thread Matt Nelson
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote: > > soon. I have yet to install RH 6.1 (BTW, on the machine > > with NT dual-boot :-)), but I heard several reports > > on local mailing lists mentioning instability > > With dual boot NT you want to pick up the errata boot floppies > > Alan at least for m

Re: updated redhat distribution / installation cdroms

1999-10-25 Thread Matt Nelson
On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Tom Diehl wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Matt Nelson wrote: > > > why should i have to burn my own disk??? i paid $80 so that i wouldn't > > have to! > > > > i suspect you are correct, though. Red Hat will probably not issue new > &

Re: updated redhat distribution / installation cdroms

1999-10-22 Thread Matt Nelson
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Tony Nugent wrote: > On Thu Oct 21 1999 at 17:45, Matt Nelson wrote: > > > Subject: Re: a workaround for upgrading in presence of an NTFS partitio > > > > > i'm really pissed that i can't boot from the CD to upgr

Re: a workaround for upgrading in presence of an NTFS partitio

1999-10-21 Thread Matt Nelson
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Matt Nelson wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, JF Martinez wrote: > > > I too experienced the NTFS bug when upgrading RedHat 6.1. Using fdisk > > > I changed the partition identifier to Windows95

RHEA-1999:044 New boot and anaconda update images available (fwd)

1999-10-21 Thread Matt Nelson
Well, an update to the broken installer is available. However, I think this fix is terribly inconvenient. Not only do I need TWO floppy disks in addition to the CD, but I also need to remember special instructions for getting it to work properly. I sincerely hope that Red Hat considers the pos

Re: a workaround for upgrading in presence of an NTFS partitio

1999-10-21 Thread Matt Nelson
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, JF Martinez wrote: > > I too experienced the NTFS bug when upgrading RedHat 6.1. Using fdisk > I changed the partition identifier to Windows95. Then the > installation worked like a charm. At first reboot I restored the NTFS > identifier on the NT partition. > > Simple

Re: More 6.1 Upgrades Woes

1999-10-20 Thread Matt Nelson
patches. After you install you should goto > http://redhat.com/support and download and install the patches for redhat > 6.1. > > Have fun... > > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Matt Nelson wrote: > > > > > The Red Hat 6.1 installer is a bug-r

Re: More 6.1 Upgrades Woes

1999-10-20 Thread Matt Nelson
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Matt Nelson wrote: > > > > out of curiosity, i switched to VC2 to check what was mounted: > > > >bash# mount > >/dev/root / ext2 rw 0 0 > >/proc /proc proc rw 0 0 > >

More 6.1 Upgrades Woes

1999-10-20 Thread Matt Nelson
The Red Hat 6.1 installer is a bug-ridden mess. This is an update to my original post to redhat-list regarding problems with upgrading from Red Hat 6.0 to Red Hat 6.1. First some background; I burned a RH6.1 CD from an ISO image I grabbed from ftp.cdrom.com. when I tried to upgrade my machine t

Re: 6.1 Upgrade woes

1999-10-19 Thread Matt Nelson
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Kevin Waterson wrote: > Matt Nelson wrote: > > > > this is a really lame bug. how uncommon is it for someone to have > > NT4 on the first disk and Red Hat on the second? it's gotta happen > > all the time. shame on Red Hat.] > > Co

Re: 6.1 Upgrade woes

1999-10-18 Thread Matt Nelson
Gerald Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Liguo Song wrote: > The same thing happened to me. > > I believe the problem is that RH installer couldn't tell the hda1 is an NTFS > partition. I would believe that it is a bug in the installer. this is supported by another response i

6.1 Upgrade woes

1999-10-18 Thread Matt Nelson
I just tried to upgrade my machine to 6.1. The installer crashed, and I am completely unable to upgrade my existing 6.0 system. The symptom: Graphical install: after selecting the "upgrade" option, I get a message window stating: "error mounting ext2