have u entered the DNS ip of u'r isp ( see the /etc/resolv.conf file is
it empty ?
what does it contain?)if it is empty then enter the name server ip of
u'r isp
( u can get it frm u'r isp) u can use linuxconf to enter it
(config--> n/wing-->client tasks--> name server specification(DNS))
Dev Ana
ya know when you're off line and you click on netscape and try to go somewhere. It says that socks can't be found and all that sort of good stuff. It's saying I'm not online but yet I am. I hope thats enough info. If not I'll gladly write down what it says. Most other things Chat, email, etc
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, it's a bachelor's degree. A real doctor's done lots more study
> including original research. The use of the tile 'Doctor' for medical folk
> is honorary. When they're better qualified (speciallists), they like to be
> called 'Mister." A
> -When your child are ill you require the person caring for them had a
> certification called doctorate in medicine.
Actually, it's a bachelor's degree. A real doctor's done lots more study
including original research. The use of the tile 'Doctor' for medical folk
is honorary. When they're b
JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Be legally liable would not be mandatory: an engineer course who
> would graduate people not able to integrate (x**2)dx would quickly
> lose all credibility.
Then why are engineers licensed?
In any case, here's some food for thought:
http://www.acm.org
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > -When your child are ill you require the person caring for them had a
> > certification called doctorate in medicine.
>
> This works because there is a very stringent licensing program
> enforced by law, and practitioners are held legally liable.
JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -When your child are ill you require the person caring for them had a
> certification called doctorate in medicine.
This works because there is a very stringent licensing program
enforced by law, and practitioners are held legally liable.
Current compu
>
> > -When you were young I guess your employer asked what certifiaction
> > you had except that he called it an engineer degree.
>
> Actually I was self taught with the addition of a few courses here and
> there. I got in by being able to demonstrate my knowledge in an
> interview.
>
>
So
I fully agree. I'm currently getting my MCSE only because it helps get the
"foot in the door" so to speak. However I already know the information I
just need to product money to take the exams. Same goes for the A+
certification.
On the other hand I know very little about Linux and am going to
there are lots of ways to say 'i know this stuff', well, this one more.
they are just part of our communication/understanding and we gonna need
them until everyone begins practicing telepathy or so.. :)
Matt Fahrner wrote:
>
>
>
> Nothing personal toward those who are certified, but personal
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Huh. This sort of errors should go to maintainers of:
> - glibc
> - ncurses
> This is a serious namespace pollution: macro ERR used by
> ncurses (curses.h) and somewhere in glibc (ucontext.h),
> but mean completely different things. Hence the com
> -When you were young I guess your employer asked what certifiaction
> you had except that he called it an engineer degree.
Actually I was self taught with the addition of a few courses here and
there. I got in by being able to demonstrate my knowledge in an
interview.
This brings up part of m
I upgraded my kernel to 2.2.15-2.5.0 for various reasons and now I get:
nfs warning: mount version older than kernel.
What RPMs do I need to upgrade to make this warning go away?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues virCIO
http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ http://www.virCIO.Com
+1 5
I went through the RedHat cert a year ago.
This was mostly because my company would pay for it, and it was
a cheap vacation (hey, a week in NC, hanging out at RH the week
they had their IPO).
JF Martinez wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Nothing personal toward those who are certified, but personally I
Having just upgraded a couple of systems to Red Hat 6.2, let me
compliment the developers for a job well done.
I do, however, have a suggestion for improving the user-friendliness of
the installer. Here is the crux of the issue:
Philosophically, An "upgrade" of a system basically involves repla
>
>
>
> Nothing personal toward those who are certified, but personally I hate
> certifications because:
>
> a) They cost money that people (I) have better uses for.
> b) They cost time that people have better uses for (I know I prefer
>to have a life).
> c) They aren't necessarily a guara
Nothing personal toward those who are certified, but personally I hate
certifications because:
a) They cost money that people (I) have better uses for.
b) They cost time that people have better uses for (I know I prefer
to have a life).
c) They aren't necessarily a guarantee of anything (jus
Huh. This sort of errors should go to maintainers of:
- glibc
- ncurses
This is a serious namespace pollution: macro ERR used by
ncurses (curses.h) and somewhere in glibc (ucontext.h),
but mean completely different things. Hence the comilation error.
As a temporary and very ugly hack your ca
I recently installed nail (an open-source mime-compliant version of mail).
It expects /var/spool/mail to have 1777 permissions to allow
a dot-lock to be implemented. It seems that RedHat has disabled
dot-locking in mailx. Questions:
+ Does mailx use some other method to prevent interfering u
19 matches
Mail list logo
