lo%40r-project.org/msg03953.html
>
> regards,
>
> James
>
>>
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:06:05 +1000
>> From: Simon Blomberg
>> To: r-sig-phylo@r-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [R-sig-phylo] interpreting pGLS
>> Message-ID: <56aaace
o@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-phylo] interpreting pGLS
> Message-ID: <56aaaced.3020...@uq.edu.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> Hi Rizwana,
>
> There is no reason why we would expect the phylogenetic signal in the
> raw variab
Hi Rizwana,
There is no reason why we would expect the phylogenetic signal in the
raw variables to be the same as the phylogenetic signal from the
regression analysis (K or lambda), as in the regression, you are really
looking at the phylogenetic signal of the _residuals_, which may be
quite
