Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] qmail-scanner and duplicated email

2012-02-16 Thread Tomas Charvat
Well it is feature or bug of QS. It happen very often, that you proceed email by QS, client drop connection due to timeout, but QS inject email into queue instead of dropping email, because client has closed connection. It often happen with email, that need longer time to proceed (+30 seconds).

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] disguised .exe files

2011-03-23 Thread Tomas Charvat
ost output from your qmail-queue.log if you believe, that QS misbehave. cheers Tomas On 03/23/2011 05:06 PM, Ethy H. Brito wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:46:41 +0100 Tomas Charvat wrote: Did you i got right, that you are trying to detect renamed extension by its extension ? ummm... sounds li

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] disguised .exe files

2011-03-23 Thread Tomas Charvat
Did you i got right, that you are trying to detect renamed extension by its extension ? ummm... sounds like mission impossible to me. My colleague has developed this functionality and he is able to block attachments by its mime type. He detect real mime type of each attachment and compare to b

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] [Qmail-scanner-announce] qmail-scanner-2.06-rc1 (new f-prot support)

2009-02-16 Thread Tomas Charvat
Well few facts. Fpscan is not deamonized and its detection time is 20x-100x slower that Clamav or Fpscand. It also double load of your server. Fpscand is running in single thread and quite often get stuck. I belive, that it can't handle huge traffic. (more that 10 emails per second) Clama

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] f-prot version 6 problem

2009-01-21 Thread Tomas Charvat
Hi guys, If you will use FPSCAND, scanning will be as fast as clamdscan. I think, that Miroslav Urbanek has submitted such patch. cheers tomas Phibee Network Operation Center wrote: Hi i don't know if i can help you but i have get on internet a sub script for f-prot 6 ... i have added to

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] White List

2007-11-14 Thread Tomas Charvat
Yes i do. Since i never used non-st version, its somehow melting in my mind ;) tomas Jason Haar wrote: Tomas Charvat wrote: Actualy there is :)) see per-domain-settings ... you can define rule (and omit QS or clamav or SA) on per user basis ;) You must be referring to qmail

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] White List

2007-11-14 Thread Tomas Charvat
Actualy there is :)) see per-domain-settings ... you can define rule (and omit QS or clamav or SA) on per user basis ;) cheers tomas Jason Haar wrote: Rafael Dewes wrote: Friends, I´m using the last version of qmail-scanner + spamassassin + clamav. I really need that some users (serv

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Occasional error with some messages.

2007-11-14 Thread Tomas Charvat
Just a note guys since example was proceeded in 0.676039 secs spamc timeout is not your problem. bst rgds tomas Jarbas Celante - CTE Internet wrote: Lampa writes: Hello, it can be timeout (qmail-scanner have default 30 seconds) or it can be that message is bigger that 250KB

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] User validation before scanning the mail?

2007-10-20 Thread Tomas Charvat
There are a lot of SPP plugins to verify existence of recipient. I would suggest to use them. SPP invoke before qmail-scanner. I would love to see SPP recipient validation via SMTP delivery attempt or VRFY cmd for mail relays with Mysql DB caching, like Postfix has. It would trigger even before

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] qmail hangs for while

2007-10-06 Thread Tomas Charvat
I have to disagere. I have dual core amd64 with 3Gb of ram. I setup deadline for email, so SA must report result in 100 seconds otherwise QS will just skip SA. My limit at the moment is around 45 connections for smtp and 33 connections to the SA. Its best setup to have all emails scanned within

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] per domain ignore <>

2007-05-31 Thread Tomas Charvat
k it might be useful in per-domain settings. cheers tomas Lampa wrote: Hello, i think that empty sender is not valid (checkuser should stop it) or you mean something special? 2007/5/31, Tomas Charvat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Greeting folk, do you think, that it would be useful to

[Qmail-scanner-general] per domain ignore <>

2007-05-31 Thread Tomas Charvat
Greeting folk, do you think, that it would be useful to have per domain setting to ignore empty (<>) sender ? cheers tomas - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 ex

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] hashcash addition for qmail scanner

2007-05-30 Thread Tomas Charvat
I think that DK and DKIM would be more usefull in QSst Both sign and verify mechanism. bstrgds Tomas JHolder wrote: > Hello all, > > First of all, I would like to extend thanks to Jason Haar and the > community for such wonderful software. > > I have been running qmail scanner for a while, and I

[Qmail-scanner-general] per domain reg ex ?

2007-03-06 Thread Tomas Charvat
is it possible to put some reg ex rules or wildcards to the QS's SPD file ? like [EMAIL PROTECTED]:none or [EMAIL PROTECTED]:none or [EMAIL PROTECTED]:none or something like this ? regards tomas - Take Surveys. Earn Cash.

[Qmail-scanner-general] perl error ?

2007-01-24 Thread Tomas Charvat
do you have a clue how to get rid of this error ? Requeuing: Insecure dependency in piped open while running with -T switch at /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl line 3064. it occure, while im trying to redirect quarantine in 'real time' via sa_redirect. best regards tomas ---