I am searching for the program or algorithm that makes the best possible of
completly (diffused data/random noise) and wonder what the state of art
compression is.
I understand this is not the correct forum but since i think i have an
algorithm that can do this very good, and do not know where
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 19:01:40 UTC+1 skrev Antoon Pardon:
> Op 30-10-13 17:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>
> >>
>
> >> I have no need to implement a newsreader as I can quite happily send a
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 19:53:59 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 18:21, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I am searching for the program or algorithm that makes the best possible of
> > completly (diffused data/random noise) and wonder what the state of art
> > com
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:18:30 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 19:01, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > And your still a stupid monkey i dare you to go test your IQ.
>
> >
>
>
>
> It's you're as in you are and not your as in belongs to me.
>
>
>
> I h
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:18:30 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 19:01, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > And your still a stupid monkey i dare you to go test your IQ.
>
> >
>
>
>
> It's you're as in you are and not your as in belongs to me.
>
>
>
> I h
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:05:07 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 18:43, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > And ***that is not by having every stupid anal monkey sitting manually
> > removing linebreaks by hand***
>
> >
>
> > Is that understood?
>
> >
>
>
>
> No
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:35:59 UTC+1 skrev Tim Delaney:
> On 31 October 2013 05:21, wrote:
>
> I am searching for the program or algorithm that makes the best possible of
> completly (diffused data/random noise) and wonder what the state of art
> compression is.
>
>
>
>
>
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:09:45 UTC+1 skrev Antoon Pardon:
> Op 30-10-13 19:02, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 18:44:20 UTC+1 skrev MRAB:
>
> >> On 30/10/2013 16:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>> Den onsdagen den
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:46:57 UTC+1 skrev Modulok:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:21 PM, wrote:
>
>
>
> I am searching for the program or algorithm that makes the best possible of
> completly (diffused data/random noise) and wonder what the state of art
> compression is.
>
>
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:46:57 UTC+1 skrev Modulok:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:21 PM, wrote:
>
>
>
> I am searching for the program or algorithm that makes the best possible of
> completly (diffused data/random noise) and wonder what the state of art
> compression is.
>
>
Den lördagen den 2:e november 2013 kl. 21:19:44 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but
>
> >in honesty the gui editor of python should have what i propose, a parser
>
> >that indent automati
Den lördagen den 2:e november 2013 kl. 21:19:44 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but
>
> >in honesty the gui editor of python should have what i propose, a parser
>
> >that indent automati
Den lördagen den 2:e november 2013 kl. 22:31:09 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >Well then i have news for you.
>
>
>
> Well, then, why don't you share it?
>
>
>
> Let me try to get you to understand WHY what you say is impossible. Let's
>
> say you d
Den måndagen den 4:e november 2013 kl. 14:53:28 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den lördagen den 2:e november 2013 kl. 22:31:09 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
>
> > jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >Well then i have news for you.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Well,
Den måndagen den 4:e november 2013 kl. 15:27:19 UTC+1 skrev Dave Angel:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 05:53:28 -0800 (PST), jonas.thornv...@gmail.com
>
> wrote:
>
> > Den lördagen den 2:e november 2013 kl. 22:31:09 UTC+1 skrev Tim
>
> Roberts:
>
> > > Here's another way to look at it. If f(x) is smal
Den torsdagen den 7:e november 2013 kl. 23:26:45 UTC+1 skrev Chris Angelico:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Mark Janssen
> wrote:
>
> > I think the idea is that you could take any arbitrary input sequence,
>
> > view it as a large number, and then find what exponential equation can
>
> > pr
Den fredagen den 8:e november 2013 kl. 03:17:36 UTC+1 skrev Chris Angelico:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:05 PM, wrote:
>
> > I guess what matter is how fast an algorithm can encode and decode a big
> > number, at least if you want to use it for very big sets of random data, or
> > losless video
Den fredagen den 8:e november 2013 kl. 03:43:17 UTC+1 skrev zipher:
> >> I am not sure if it is just stupidness or laziness that prevent you from
> >> seeing that 4^8=65536.
>
> >
>
> > I can see that 4^8 = 65536. Now how are you going to render 65537? You
>
> > claimed that you could render *a
I have installed Python 3.3, and i want to add a library with some basic
functions like canvas and basic geomteric objects, fonts etc. Preferably
something similar to the Javascript canvas.
I've looked for graphic packages, and from what i can see something called
Tkinter may be what i look for
Here is the example file i have tried.
#!/usr/bin/python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""
ZetCode Tkinter tutorial
This program draws three
rectangles filled with different
colors.
author: Jan Bodar
last modified: January 2011
website: www.zetcode.com
"""
from Tkinter import Tk, Canvas, Frame, BOTH
Den måndagen den 11:e november 2013 kl. 17:43:12 UTC+1 skrev Chris “Kwpolska”
Warrick:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:38 PM, wrote:
>
> > But i have no luck runn the Tkinter example file i downloaded in idel, it
> > still says no module called Tkinter.
>
> IDLE*
>
> > ===
>
> > Traceback (most
On 01.03.2015 18:34, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 01/03/2015 17:01, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Mark Lawrence :
>>
>>> Are you suggesting that we Brits have a single "home accent"? If you
>>> are, you need to stand up as your voice is rather muffled. That by the
>>> way is a British expression that may
On 01.03.2015 03:43, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Imagine if all
> your Python code ran twice as fast (that's slightly better than the
> IronPython figure quoted!), but worked only on BSD Unix and Mac OS. Is
> that something that'll make a fledgling language succeed?
I heard that Swift and Objective
On 09.03.2015 14:39, Omar Abou Mrad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Xrrific wrote:
>
>> Guys, please Help!!!
>>
>> I am trying to impress a girl who is learning python and want ask her out
>> at the same time.
>>
>> Could you please come up with something witty incorporating a simple
>>
function naiveAdd(base,arrOne,arrTwo) {
if (arrOne.length>=arrTwo.length) {length=arrOne.length;} else
{length=arrTwo.length;}
out="";
remainder=0;
for (i=0;i
Den söndag 15 mars 2015 kl. 19:32:02 UTC+1 skrev Joel Goldstick:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 2:07 PM, wrote:
> >
> >
> > function naiveAdd(base,arrOne,arrTwo) {
> > if (arrOne.length>=arrTwo.length) {length=arrOne.length;} else
> > {length=arrTwo.length;}
> > out="";
> > remainder=0;
> > for (i=0
Den söndag 15 mars 2015 kl. 19:32:02 UTC+1 skrev Joel Goldstick:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 2:07 PM, wrote:
> >
> >
> > function naiveAdd(base,arrOne,arrTwo) {
> > if (arrOne.length>=arrTwo.length) {length=arrOne.length;} else
> > {length=arrTwo.length;}
> > out="";
> > remainder=0;
> > for (i=0
Den söndag 15 mars 2015 kl. 20:01:36 UTC+1 skrev Paul Rubin:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com writes:
> > I though it would be interesting doing comparissons in timing adding
> > massive digits in different bases. Especially in Python.
>
> Python has built-in bignums. Try "print 2**500".
I know.
--
Den söndag 15 mars 2015 kl. 20:01:36 UTC+1 skrev Paul Rubin:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com writes:
> > I though it would be interesting doing comparissons in timing adding
> > massive digits in different bases. Especially in Python.
>
> Python has built-in bignums. Try "print 2**500".
I will try i
On 16.03.2015 13:02, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> (To be honest, I'm not even sure what the use-case for close() on coroutines
> is in the first place. If you don't want to send any more items into it,
> just don't send any more items into it.)
Just like with file-likes, it is useful to clean up resou
On 16.03.2015 17:40, Chris Angelico wrote:
> This is a very plausible feature request, but be aware that it will
> involve a very costly disk search. Figuring out what modules could be
> imported means going through the entire Python module search path,
> enumerating .py (and other) files, and that
I want todo faster baseconversion for very big bases like base 1 000 000, so
instead of adding up digits i search it.
I need the fastest algorithm to find the relation to a decimal number.
Digmult is an instance of base at a digitplace (base^x) what i try to find is
the digit for the below c
Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 15:30:36 UTC+2 skrev Dave Angel:
> On 04/07/2015 05:44 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > I want todo faster baseconversion for very big bases like base 1 000 000,
> > so instead of adding up digits i search it.
>
> For this and most of the following stat
Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 16:30:15 UTC+2 skrev Denis McMahon:
> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:29:59 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
>
> > On 04/07/2015 05:44 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> I want todo faster baseconversion for very big bases like base 1 000
> >> 000, so instead of adding up digi
Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 16:32:56 UTC+2 skrev Ian:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:44 AM, wrote:
> >
> >
> > I want todo faster baseconversion for very big bases like base 1 000 000,
> > so instead of adding up digits i search it.
> >
> > I need the fastest algorithm to find the relation to a deci
Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 17:00:53 UTC+2 skrev MRAB:
> On 2015-04-07 15:36, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 16:30:15 UTC+2 skrev Denis McMahon:
> >> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:29:59 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 04/07/2015 05:44 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com
Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 17:07:36 UTC+2 skrev Ian:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:36 AM, wrote:
> > Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 16:30:15 UTC+2 skrev Denis McMahon:
> >> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:29:59 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 04/07/2015 05:44 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
>
Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 16:30:15 UTC+2 skrev Denis McMahon:
> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:29:59 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
>
> > On 04/07/2015 05:44 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> I want todo faster baseconversion for very big bases like base 1 000
> >> 000, so instead of adding up digi
Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 18:34:32 UTC+2 skrev Dave Angel:
> On 04/07/2015 11:40 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 16:32:56 UTC+2 skrev Ian:
> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:44 AM, wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I want todo faster baseconversion for very big bases like
Den tisdag 7 april 2015 kl. 21:27:20 UTC+2 skrev Ben Bacarisse:
> Ian Kelly writes:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> >> On 4/7/2015 1:44 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >>
> >> def to_base(number, base):
> >>>
> >>> ... digits = []
> >>> ... while number > 0:
> >>>
Den onsdag 8 april 2015 kl. 00:57:27 UTC+2 skrev Steven D'Aprano:
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:44 pm, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> > I want todo faster baseconversion for very big bases like base 1 000 000,
> > so instead of adding up digits i search it.
>
> What digits would you use for ba
Den onsdag 8 april 2015 kl. 03:00:12 UTC+2 skrev Gregory Ewing:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > What digits would you use for base one-million?
>
> Interesting question. Unicode currently has about
> 75,000 CJK characters, so we would need to find about
> 12 more independently developed cultures w
st, not including the memory used by
> its 12 int items. (Results may vary in other versions of Python.) You can't
> do arithmetic on it faster than Python's built-ins.
>
> Besides, it isn't clear to me whether Jonas wants to convert decimal
> 293...490 *into* base 4
Den onsdag 8 april 2015 kl. 09:16:24 UTC+2 skrev Ian:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:35 PM, wrote:
> > I am not sure you guys realised, that althoug the size of the factors to
> > muliply expands according to base^(exp+1) for each digitplace the number of
> > comparissons needed to reach the digit
Den onsdag 8 april 2015 kl. 09:16:24 UTC+2 skrev Ian:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:35 PM, wrote:
> > I am not sure you guys realised, that althoug the size of the factors to
> > muliply expands according to base^(exp+1) for each digitplace the number of
> > comparissons needed to reach the digit
Den onsdag 8 april 2015 kl. 15:40:46 UTC+2 skrev Mel Wilson:
> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 23:19:49 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
>
> > And you have just created 429496729 unique symbols ;), in a pencil
> > stroke.
>
> No. You did that, when you said base 429496729. Representing the
> symbols in a com
Den onsdag 8 april 2015 kl. 19:34:39 UTC+2 skrev Mel Wilson:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 07:56:05 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
>
> > There is no need for inventing a new set of characters representing
> > 32-bit numbers. You will not be able to learn them by heart anyway,
> > unless they build on a int
Den onsdag 8 april 2015 kl. 21:28:34 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den onsdag 8 april 2015 kl. 19:34:39 UTC+2 skrev Mel Wilson:
> > On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 07:56:05 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
> >
> > > There is no need for inventing a new set of characters representing
> > > 32-bit numbers. Y
Den torsdag 9 april 2015 kl. 17:02:24 UTC+2 skrev Chris Angelico:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Alain Ketterlin
> wrote:
> > Ouch, you're right, I tried to stick with Marko's example and forgot the
> > basics. I meant "signed ints", but the "removable" condition should be
> > something like:
Den torsdag 9 april 2015 kl. 17:04:53 UTC+2 skrev Ian:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:54 AM, wrote:
> > Aside from the base changer i've written a bignumb anybase generic
> > multiplication, addition and subtraction routine. My goal is to make the
> > arithmetic in the base of choice whatever size.
Den torsdag 9 april 2015 kl. 16:08:48 UTC+2 skrev Chris Angelico:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Alain Ketterlin
> wrote:
> > Because, in:
> >
> > z = x+y; // all signed ints
> > if ( z < x )
> > ...
> >
> > either there was no overflow (and the condition is false), or there wa
Den lördag 11 april 2015 kl. 09:35:22 UTC+2 skrev Steven D'Aprano:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 04:08 pm, Paul Rubin wrote:
>
> > Steven D'Aprano writes:
> >> It may be a bit slow for very large numbers. On my computer, this takes
> >> 20 seconds:
> >> py> pyprimes.factors.factorise(2**111+1)
> >> [3, 3
If two functions crossreference eachother back and forth what happen with the
local variables.
Will there be a new instance of function holding the variables or do they get
messed up?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Den lördag 11 april 2015 kl. 17:16:09 UTC+2 skrev Chris Angelico:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 1:00 AM, wrote:
> > If two functions crossreference eachother back and forth what happen with
> > the local variables.
> >
> > Will there be a new instance of function holding the variables or do they
>
Den lördag 11 april 2015 kl. 17:26:03 UTC+2 skrev Steven D'Aprano:
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 01:00 am, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > If two functions crossreference eachother back and forth what happen with
> > the local variables.
>
> Nothing. They are local to the function that creates the
On 16.05.2015 02:55, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> BartC wrote:
>> For example, there is a /specific/ byte-code called BINARY_ADD, which
>> then proceeds to call a /generic/ binary-op handler! This throws away
>> the advantage of knowing at byte-code generation time exactly which
>> operation is needed.
>
On 19.05.2015 19:01, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> At the moment I am playing with things like:
> p = subprocess.Popen('ls -l', shell = True, stdout = subprocess.PIPE)
>
> I think that most of the times this are the values I want. So it would
> be nice to overrule the defaults. What is the best way
case. For some use cases, the
``fake_random`` might be good enough (unittesting would be such a case:
it is certainly uniformly distributed and allows full coverage of the
tested range), for others it would fail catastrophically (don’t generate
your cryptographic keys with this!).
cheers,
Jona
On 10.06.2015 17:05, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2015 9:41 AM, "Mark Lawrence" wrote:
>>
>> On 10/06/2015 15:11, Nicholas Chammas wrote:
>>>
>>> For example, here is a "New in version 3.4.4" method:
>>>
>>> https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.ensure_future
>>>
>>> Howe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16.06.2015 01:57, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Alternatively, I can use a flag set on the function object itself:
>
> edir.dunders = False
>
>
> Naturally you can always override the default by explicitly
> specifying a keyword argument edir(obj,
Check this out using a 8 digit base with a 100 digit number no problem.
http://jt.node365.se/baseconversion3.html
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
http://jt.node365.se/baseconversion8.html
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 01:11:51 UTC+2 skrev Ian:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
> >> http://jt.node365.se/baseconversion8.html
> >
> > Back of the envelope mental calculation, that appears to be quadratic,
> > not linear. Doub
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 01:11:51 UTC+2 skrev Ian:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
> >> http://jt.node365.se/baseconversion8.html
> >
> > Back of the envelope mental calculation, that appears to be quadratic,
> > not linear. Doub
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 02:09:17 UTC+2 skrev Ben Bacarisse:
> Ian Kelly writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
> >>> http://jt.node365.se/baseconversion8.html
>
> > By the way, I think you have a bug. I did my time test
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:08:01 UTC+2 skrev Christian Gollwitzer:
> Am 30.06.15 um 10:52 schrieb jonas.thornv...@gmail.com:
> > It still bug out on very big numbers if base outside integer scope.
> > I am very keen on suggestions regarding the logic to make it faster.
>
> Concerning the algor
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:08:01 UTC+2 skrev Christian Gollwitzer:
> Am 30.06.15 um 10:52 schrieb jonas.thornv...@gmail.com:
> > It still bug out on very big numbers if base outside integer scope.
> > I am very keen on suggestions regarding the logic to make it faster.
>
> Concerning the algor
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:35:06 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:08:01 UTC+2 skrev Christian Gollwitzer:
> > Am 30.06.15 um 10:52 schrieb jonas.thornv...@gmail.com:
> > > It still bug out on very big numbers if base outside integer scope.
> > > I am very keen
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:43:55 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:35:06 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> > Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:08:01 UTC+2 skrev Christian Gollwitzer:
> > > Am 30.06.15 um 10:52 schrieb jonas.thornv...@gmail.com:
> > > > It still b
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 15:22:44 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:43:55 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> > Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:35:06 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> > > Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 11:08:01 UTC+2 skrev Christian Gollwitzer:
> >
Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 18:12:46 UTC+2 skrev Michael Torrie:
> Do you have some Python code to show us?
No i just thought you would find the digit search algorithm interesting.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I fried my AMD Bulldozer last week, so I cannot check
there.
regards,
jonas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVmjunAAoJEMBiAyWXYliKzDwP+wcCn9AW7EdZ/gHEmw6vW9sL
MFUszpPQ3+HYPLuMn35tAy31GDozCBHze8AISHzL0oWCj6u1x7z4gxY0MKaAsRuh
Gp5R5W+KHpE0tYps65SHUFUxCvf5YSR4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
These are quite a few questions and I’ll try to answer some of them. I
have cut out the windows specific questions because I cannot answer them
.
On 25.07.2015 11:39, E.D.G. wrote:
> At the moment our Perl programs use Windows "Pipes" plus file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02.08.2015 05:53, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> When invoked this way, the module cs.app.maildb that is being
> executed is actually the module named "__main__". If some other
> piece of code imports "cs.app.maildb" they get a _different_
> instance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 13.08.2015 08:26, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
>
> So, I take this as a "my personal preference guideline" because I
> cannot find an official document for this (maybe, I am looking at
> the wrong places).
- From RFC 1855 (Netiquette Guidelines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08.09.2015 16:31, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Vladimir Ignatov
> wrote:
>>> I had some experience programming in Lua and I'd say - that
>>> language is bad example to follow. Indexes start with 1 (I am
>>> not kidding)
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBRMq2Ioxsc
Jonas.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
I'm going to say a suggestion, why don't you create a forum like the one
of Ruby (http://www.rubyforums.com/)? for the novices this is a great
help, better than a mail list
It's also worth noting that rubyforums.com has nearly no posts (six
total) because it takes very just a short time worki
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> I wonder if there's a way to gateway the tutor list to the
> python-forum.org forum, probably to the beginner's forum.
>
> Skip
>
>
Totally in agreement with this. Thus each one chooses if wants to
posting from forum or mailing list
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Dave Brueck wrote:
> Amen! Generally they are an abomination.
>
> To make matters worse, many forums that become popular are saddled with so
> many
> advertisements that moving from one message to another becomes a...
> grueling...
> lesson... in... patience.
>
> -Dave
Then that hasn't happ
Markus Weihs wrote:
>
> If you speak German, there is a forum at www.python-forum.de .
> There is also an english one at http://python-forum.org/py/index.php,
> but as you can see, there's not much traffic :-/
>
There are few messages because they are not known. I believe that they
would be due
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What's wrong with this web forum ;-)
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.python?hl=en
>
> c.l.python is a mailing list, usenet group and a web forum. How you
> access it is up to you. There are also other nntp-to-web sites out
> there, and you can even
Max Noel wrote:
>
> The [:2] is unnecessary, as you're limiting the number of splits to
> 2, so the resulting list from split() can't have more than 3 elements.
>
Without the [:2], it fails
> Also, note that this code will likely cause the program to crash on
> any system that isn't L
Alan G wrote:
>>I'm tryin compare a string with a value with style of
>
> Use regular expressions and turn it around:
>
> import re
> s = 'i686'
> ex = re.compile('i?86')
> if ex.match(s): print 'they match!'
>
> Is that what you mean?
>
> Alan G.
>
>
Thanks, that's the way. But in a express
Hi guys,
I´m experiencing weird error messages while installing MySQL-python
with easy_install... I have no idea where the errors come from.
Read the whole output at http://pastebin.com/m3859cf40
It´s really a lot...
Someone got ideas?
Greets
Jonas
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
limit"s and catching MemoryError?
Thanks for your help,
Jonas
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello,
I've done some benchmarking while attempting to serialize my (large)
graph data structure with cPickle; I'm seeing superlinear performance
(plotting it seems to suggest n^2 where n is the number of nodes of my
graph), in the duration of the pickle.dump calls and I can't quite
figure out wh
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 20:57 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Eric Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've done some benchmarking while attempting to serialize my (large)
> > graph data structure with cPickle; I'm seeing superlinear performance
> > (plo
n a Google App
Engine request handler.
So right now I have to apply unquote() twice in order to get the correct
result.
Any clue much appreciated.
--Jonas Galvez
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
03"; />
urn:uuid:1225c695-cfb8-4ebb--80da344efa6a
2003-12-13T18:30:02Z
Some text.
http://github.com/galvez/gae-rest/tree/258066f5e1a32c999e04a9313943fdfa8e64edd9/xmlbuilder.py
--Jonas Galvez
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
as simple as possible, so I wouldn't even have to assign a
variable on the with block ("as something"). I plan to add some
validation and error checking, but for generating feeds for my Atom
store it's reasonably fast and lean (just over 50 lines of code).
--Jonas
aving other child
elements. I believe my xmlbuilder will work well for Atom, XML-RPC,
SOAP etc, but definitely not for HTML! :)
Overriding + is a rather clever way to prevent this (so you can
actually know you're calling it inline), but I don't really see a need
for it for most things XML.
--Jonas Galvez, http://jonasgalvez.com.br/log
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
as
suggested previously might be a good solution if you want to preserve
what you've generated, tho.
--Jonas Galvez
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
)
file_source=open("google_source.txt", 'w')
file_source.write(urllib2.urlopen(req).read())
file_source.close()
I think Google blocks the User-Agent urllib2 sends.
--Jonas Galvez, http://jonasgalvez.com.br/log
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:52 AM, spandana g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He
I'm getting lot's of messages to: undisclosed-recipients:;
Which horribly scrambles my email, since no filters are applied to them.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gt; --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Jonas Geiregat
jo...@geiregat.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 19-nov-09, om 09:42 heeft Jebagnana Das het volgende geschreven:
Hi Friends,
I want to thank you all for doing a great job.. I
seek your suggestions and valuable guidance regarding two things.
1) I'm using python 3.1.1 and wxWidgets for GUI development in my
project ..
blob/master/bjoern.c#L32
Thanks for your help!
Jonas
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
;]!? Is there a simple
solution that separates f1 and f2 without forcing me to write code for
the special case when you don't feed members to the __init__()-function?
/Jonas
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10 Ago, 13:58, Jonas Nilsson wrote:
You stumbled in two python common pitfalls at once :-)
One, the default arguments issue, was already pointed to you.
The other one is that python variables are just names for objects.
Assigning a variable never mean making a copy, it just means
101 - 200 of 224 matches
Mail list logo