Den tisdag 30 juni 2015 kl. 02:09:17 UTC+2 skrev Ben Bacarisse: > Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:39 PM, <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> http://jt.node365.se/baseconversion8.html > <snip> > > By the way, I think you have a bug. I did my time testing by > > concatenating the default input number to itself several times. At > > 5184 decimal digits, which was the last case I tried, the 58th output > > digit was 1111111, after which point the remaining 672 output digits > > are all 12665464, which seemed rather improbable. > > Yes, it's a bug. Because it's off-topic, I won't say more here but I > posted a simpler test case to comp.lang.javacript just now (10000000 > converted to base 100). I would not normally reply here, but I wanted > to acknowledge your post as prompting me to look for other cases. > Followup-to: set. > > -- > Ben.
Thank you, for finding the bug Ben, it turned out i did basicly same thing two times. One of the times was the more general case and that turned out to do the correct thing. jt.node365.se/baseconversion9.html It still bug out on very big numbers if base outside integer scope. I am very keen on suggestions regarding the logic to make it faster. I will read in base into an array holding bignumb, and then it should work for anybase and any number as far i can understand. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
