Walter Dörwald wrote: > Of course the node constructor could append the > node to the currently active element. However there > might be cases where you want to do something else > with the newly created node, so always appending the > node is IMHO the wrong thing.
Unless you're using it as a templating engine of sorts, much like Ruby's builder used in Rails. Which is exactly what I'm trying to get at. I don't want to store the tree in any way or be able to modify it afterwards, I just want to generate the XML as the block is executed. Using ElementTree as suggested previously might be a good solution if you want to preserve what you've generated, tho. --Jonas Galvez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
