Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:09:45 UTC+1 skrev Antoon Pardon: > Op 30-10-13 19:02, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef: > > > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 18:44:20 UTC+1 skrev MRAB: > > >> On 30/10/2013 16:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> > > >>> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence: > > >> > > >>> No that is not my problem, apparently so it is that the newsreader > >>> constructors do not like the competition of Google groups otherwise they > >>> would had written the five lines of codes necessary to remove the empty > >>> linebreaks. > > >> > > >>> I like web based features, and i will use them until "they get it right, > >>> understood?" > > >> > > >>> End of story > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >> Google Groups aren't following the standard. Everybody else is. Why > > >> > > >> should everybody else have to add a fix to correct what Google Groups > > >> > > >> keeps getting wrong? > > > > > > I do see though this have to be something related to their database, > > nothing they do by purpose. So unless the database storing messages change, > > it probably would need an ugly fix like a script. > > > > > > So probably you should direct your question to either the creators of > > googles database or beg the creators of google groups to do a fix... > > > > You are wrong. If you use a service that is faulty, then the annoyance > > that creates, is your responsibilty. > > > > Just suppose your neighbours rented a paint pistol that was faulty and > > because of that they sprayed paint on some of your valuables. Would you > > agree that it wouldn't be their problem. Would you agree they could > > just continue using that paint pistol spraying paint on your possession > > and telling you, you should go to the firm where they rented the paint > > pistol with your complaints? > > > > You are using faulty news software that contributes hard to read > > messages and thus pollutes the newsgroup. I understand this is not > > your intention but it sure is the effect of your behaviour. So > > you are polluting this newsgroup and now you have been made aware of > > it. Continueing with the same behaviour will not encourage others to > > help you in the future. > > > > -- > > Antoon Pardon
No certainly not you are incorrect, either annoyed readers, newsreaders or you chose to filter out the annoyance, or you implement the fucking 5 lines of code making it. And one certainly can wonder why Google have not done that. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
