Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

On Jun 4, 1:03 am, Carl Banks wrote: > Which is an implementation of publish-subscribe pattern.  I didn't say > or imply it was general purpose.  And it doesn't have to be to make a > case for inclusion of a general-purpose implementation in the standard > library. It's analogous, but it's not m

Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

On Jun 3, 8:46 am, Vinay Sajip wrote: > On Jun 2, 4:09 am, Carl Banks wrote: > > > I think it has a pretty good chance of being accepted, too.  The > > publish-subscribe pattern, if you will, seems to have been implemented > > separately in many places.  The logging module in the standard library

Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

On Jun 2, 4:09 am, Carl Banks wrote: > I think it has a pretty good chance of being accepted, too.  The > publish-subscribe pattern, if you will, seems to have been implemented > separately in many places.  The logging module in the standard library > uses something like this. Only in a very gen

Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

I definitvely vote for adding such a package to the stdlib (or at least a symilar publish/subscrive and observer implementation). It's useful in a wide range of programs. 2010/6/2 Carl Banks > On May 26, 4:26 am, Tom wrote: > > I vote for adding the Python package "pubsub" to the Python standa

Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

Daniel Fetchinson writes: > A good example for the first couple of stages of this process is PEP > 3143 concerning adding a daemon package to the stdlib: > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3143/ Thanks for the shout-out for PEP 3143. I can certainly say that the process Daniel describes was a

Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

> I vote for adding the Python package "pubsub" to the Python standard > library. It has recently been added to wxpython (replacing the old > wx.lib.pubsub package), but it has application to non-gui programs as > well. > > For more information see: . If you are re

Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

On May 26, 4:26 am, Tom wrote: > I vote for adding the Python package "pubsub" to the Python standard > library.  It has recently been added to wxpython (replacing the old > wx.lib.pubsub package), but it has application to non-gui programs as > well. Well, I can definitely see a case for adding

Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

On 5/31/2010 5:37 PM, Aahz wrote: In article<6b9d2898-4166-40b4-9016-dc55dee77...@q33g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>, Tom wrote: I vote for adding the Python package "pubsub" to the Python standard library. It has recently been added to wxpython (replacing the old wx.lib.pubsub package), but it ha

Re: Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

In article <6b9d2898-4166-40b4-9016-dc55dee77...@q33g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>, Tom wrote: > >I vote for adding the Python package "pubsub" to the Python standard >library. It has recently been added to wxpython (replacing the old >wx.lib.pubsub package), but it has application to non-gui progra

Vote to Add Python Package "pubsub" to the Python Standard Library

I vote for adding the Python package "pubsub" to the Python standard library. It has recently been added to wxpython (replacing the old wx.lib.pubsub package), but it has application to non-gui programs as well. For more information see: . -- http://mail.python.o