On Jun 4, 1:03 am, Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> wrote: > Which is an implementation of publish-subscribe pattern. I didn't say > or imply it was general purpose. And it doesn't have to be to make a > case for inclusion of a general-purpose implementation in the standard > library.
It's analogous, but it's not messaging. And I didn't give that as a reason why there should or shouldn't be a pub/sub module in the stdlib; my other comments were more relevant in that debate. Regards, Vinay Sajip -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
