On Jun 2, 4:09 am, Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it has a pretty good chance of being accepted, too. The > publish-subscribe pattern, if you will, seems to have been implemented > separately in many places. The logging module in the standard library > uses something like this.
Only in a very general sense, if you mean the separation of concerns between loggers and handlers. There isn't a general-purpose pub/sub infrastructure built into it. Of course, pub/sub is just one type of message architecture. I would say that it would be nice to have a Python messaging package which had pub/sub as one of several different approaches - which is often done these days using things like RabbitMQ. Are there any such (pure-Python or Python + C) packages out there which are generally accepted as being head and shoulders above others in the same category? It may be too early to bless any one messaging package for the stdlib - "let a thounsand flowers bloom" and all that. In any case, stdlib inclusion can be a double-edged sword in terms of backward- compatibility constraints, leading to reduced developer/maintainer flexibility going forward. Regards, Vinay Sajip -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
