On Jun 3, 8:46 am, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Jun 2, 4:09 am, Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think it has a pretty good chance of being accepted, too. The > > publish-subscribe pattern, if you will, seems to have been implemented > > separately in many places. The logging module in the standard library > > uses something like this. > > Only in a very general sense, if you mean the separation of concerns > between loggers and handlers. There isn't a general-purpose pub/sub > infrastructure built into it.
Which is an implementation of publish-subscribe pattern. I didn't say or imply it was general purpose. And it doesn't have to be to make a case for inclusion of a general-purpose implementation in the standard library. Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
