On 3/8/14 7:53 AM, JCosta wrote:
I did some work in c# and java and I converted some application to Python; I
noticed Python is much slower than the other languages.
Is this normal ?
Thanks
Your question, and the replies so far in this thread, have overlooked
the difference between language
On 08/03/2014 18:30, JCosta wrote:
Sábado, 8 de Março de 2014 12:53:57 UTC, JCosta escreveu:
I did some work in c# and java and I converted some application to Python; I
noticed Python is much slower than the other languages.
Is this normal ?
Thanks
...
Thanks for the help (C
Sábado, 8 de Março de 2014 12:53:57 UTC, JCosta escreveu:
> I did some work in c# and java and I converted some application to Python; I
> noticed Python is much slower than the other languages.
>
>
>
> Is this normal ?
>
> Thanks
...
Thanks for the help (Chris, Tim and Marko) an
JCosta :
> I did some work in c# and java and I converted some application to
> Python; I noticed Python is much slower than the other languages.
>
> Is this normal ?
Yes. The main reason is the dot notation, which in C through Java is
implemented by the compiler as a fixed offset to a memory str
On 2014-03-08 04:53, JCosta wrote:
> I did some work in c# and java and I converted some application to
> Python; I noticed Python is much slower than the other languages.
>
> Is this normal ?
It depends.
Did you write C#/Java in Python (i.e., use C# or Java idioms in
Python), or did you write P
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:53 PM, JCosta wrote:
> I did some work in c# and java and I converted some application to Python; I
> noticed Python is much slower than the other languages.
>
> Is this normal ?
> Thanks
The first thing to look at is the conversion. If you convert idiomatic
Java code i
Wayne Werner, 03.08.2013 15:09:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Schneider wrote:
>> I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos) and
>> I'm wondering, if this
>> can be done in python (in terms of performance, of course not in terms of
>> possibility ;) ).
>>
>> It has to handle around
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Schneider wrote:
Hi list,
I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos) and
I'm wondering, if this
can be done in python (in terms of performance, of course not in terms
of possibility ;) ).
It has to handle around 2000 mails per hour for at least 8h
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Schneider wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos) and I'm
> wondering, if this
> can be done in python (in terms of performance, of course not in terms of
> possibility ;) ).
>
> It has to handle around 2000 mails per
On 2013-08-02, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2013-08-02, Schneider wrote:
>
>> I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos)
>> and I'm wondering, if this can be done in python (in terms of
>> performance, of course not in terms of possibility ;) ).
>>
>> It has to handle around
On 2013-08-02, Schneider wrote:
> I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos)
> and I'm wondering, if this can be done in python (in terms of
> performance, of course not in terms of possibility ;) ).
>
> It has to handle around 2000 mails per hour for at least 8hours a day
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Schneider wrote:
> Queuing the mails for a while is not possible, because the tool should sit
> between the client and smtp-server.
> It should act as proxy, not as server.
I've written an SMTP proxy (primary purpose: check SPF records;
secondary purpose: rate-limi
On 08/02/2013 03:09 PM, Ray Cote wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Schneider"
To: python-list@python.org
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 8:00:09 AM
Subject: Python performance
Hi list,
I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos)
and
I'm wondering, if this
can be d
- Original Message -
> From: "Schneider"
> To: python-list@python.org
> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 8:00:09 AM
> Subject: Python performance
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos)
> and
> I'm wondering, if this
> can be done in python (in ter
On Fri 02 Aug 2013 02:59:26 PM CEST, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2013-08-02 14:00, Schneider wrote:
I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos)
and I'm wondering, if this
can be done in python (in terms of performance, of course not in
terms of possibility ;) ).
It has to handle
On 2013-08-02 14:00, Schneider wrote:
> I have to write a small SMTP-Relay script (+ some statistic infos)
> and I'm wondering, if this
> can be done in python (in terms of performance, of course not in
> terms of possibility ;) ).
>
> It has to handle around 2000 mails per hour for at least 8hour
Antoine Pitrou writes on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:25:43 +
(UTC):
> Le Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:39:14 -0700, John Nagle a écrit :
> >
> > Note that multithreaded compute-bound Python programs really suck
> > on multiprocessors. Adding a second CPU makes the program go slower,
> > due to a lame mec
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Aahz wrote:
> In article <
> 1a4707f5-85be-4f5f-ac3e-cf8f5bd21...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> inaf wrote:
> >
> >I have been following this group for quite some time and I figured
> >(after searching enough on google --and on this group-- and not finding
>
In article <1a4707f5-85be-4f5f-ac3e-cf8f5bd21...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
inaf wrote:
>
>I have been following this group for quite some time and I figured
>(after searching enough on google --and on this group-- and not finding
>anything useful) I could pose this question here. Can anyone
Le Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:39:14 -0700, John Nagle a écrit :
>
> Note that multithreaded compute-bound Python programs really suck
> on multiprocessors. Adding a second CPU makes the program go slower,
> due to a lame mechanism for resolving conflicts over the global
> interpreter lock.
I'm not
inaf wrote:
I have been following this group for quite some time and I figured
(after searching enough on google --and on this group-- and not
finding anything useful) I could pose this question here. Can anyone
shed some light on python's performance on Solaris?
Note that multithreaded com
On Oct 14, 7:15 am, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> inaf gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> > Good point. I failed to compare the CPU power on these machines.. 32
> > bit linux box I have is 2666 Mhz vs the Solaris zone is 1415 Mhz.. I
> > guess that explains :) Thank you for the tip..
>
> You have to compare no
I use python in almost the same environment. I use it on Joyent and on the
Rackspace cloud. Joyent is faster for a few reasons (cpu bursting and faster
disks) but these aren't real benchmarks until they are on the same machines.
James
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Jorgen Grahn
> wrote:
> On
On Wed, 2009-10-14, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> inaf gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Good point. I failed to compare the CPU power on these machines.. 32
>> bit linux box I have is 2666 Mhz vs the Solaris zone is 1415 Mhz.. I
>> guess that explains :) Thank you for the tip..
>
> You have to compare not only
inaf gmail.com> writes:
>
> Good point. I failed to compare the CPU power on these machines.. 32
> bit linux box I have is 2666 Mhz vs the Solaris zone is 1415 Mhz.. I
> guess that explains :) Thank you for the tip..
You have to compare not only CPU frequencies but the CPU models.
Recently Sun h
On Oct 11, 6:59 am, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> inaf gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> > My code seem to
> > return lookups from a in memory data structure I build combining bunch
> > of dictionaries and lists 6-8 times faster on a 32 bit Linux box than
> > on a Solaris zone.
>
> Well, if your workload is C
inaf gmail.com> writes:
>
> My code seem to
> return lookups from a in memory data structure I build combining bunch
> of dictionaries and lists 6-8 times faster on a 32 bit Linux box than
> on a Solaris zone.
Well, if your workload is CPU-bound, the issue here is not really Solaris vs.
Linux bu
27 matches
Mail list logo
