On 12/01/2014 08:49 PM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Thanks for the bunch of suggestion , I have decided to go with PYQt for
> now : )
If the licensing of PyQt is not appropriate for you (it's GPL only,
unless you buy a license), you can use PySide, which is almost a drop-in
replacement for it, that's li
Thanks for the bunch of suggestion , I have decided to go with PYQt for
now : )
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Rod Person wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 23:13:32 +1100
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Ganesh Pal
> > wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I want to des
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 23:13:32 +1100
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Ganesh Pal
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I want to design a GUI interface for my project . I wanted it to
> > use it Python and it has to work on freebsd . Please
> > provide me the latest trends fo
Ganesh Pal writes:
> I want to design a GUI interface for my project . I wanted it to use it
> Python and it has to work on freebsd . Please provide me the latest
> trends for GUI development with python.
A good starting point https://wiki.python.org/moin/GuiProgramming>.
--
\ “Tr
I’ve been using PyQt for 10 years. Absolutely fabulous, fun, and I imagine the
others are also excellent as they have all been around long enough to die
naturally if they were not very useful.
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 3:13 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Ganesh Pal
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I want to design a GUI interface for my project . I wanted it to use it
> Python and it has to work on freebsd . Please provide me the latest
> trends for GUI development with python.
>
> Regard s
> Ganesh
There are lots of
Hi folks,
I want to design a GUI interface for my project . I wanted it to use it
Python and it has to work on freebsd . Please provide me the latest
trends for GUI development with python.
Regard s
Ganesh
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
brad wrote:
> Kevin Walzer wrote:
>
>> 2. wxPython is big, harder to learn than Tkinter, but looks good on
>> Mac, Windows, and *Nix. It will require users to install a lot of
>> extra stuff (or you'll have to bundle the extra stuff).
>
> PyInstaller builds binaries beautifully from raw py sour
On May 26, 2007, at 3:17 PM, rzed wrote:
> If there were a standard Python GUI API (call it the PGA,
> say) that be the target for app developers, they wouldn't have to
> worry about the back end. The PGA would have to be flexible enough
> to handle incompatibilities among the various approaches t
Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
> Finally, consider wax (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html).
> In my view, this is *exactly* what python needs, and its not
> being maintained anymore as far as I can tell. What I like
> about it is:
>
> 1) it is smal
> Do others think like me here?
Yes!! I agree completely: Wax is not only a fantastic idea, but a very
good start at an implementation of that idea.
--Matt Newville
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>> Sorry, maybe I'm not Pythonic enough, but talking about "GUI
>> framework", the first thing I want to see are screenshots.
>
> 0) While wax is a GUI framework, it is not a GUI designer, so I
>was wondering who you were quoting when you wrote "a GUI
>designer [...]".
>
> 1) Wax doesn
On 2007-05-24, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally, consider wax (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html). In my
view, this is *exactly* what python needs, and its not being maintained
anymore as far as I can tell. What I like about it is:
1) it is small...I
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-05-24, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Finally, consider wax (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html). In my
>>> view, this is *exactly* what python needs, and its not being maintained
>>> anymore as far as I can tell. What I like about it is:
>>>
>>
On 2007-05-24, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Finally, consider wax (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html). In my
>> view, this is *exactly* what python needs, and its not being maintained
>> anymore as far as I can tell. What I like about it is:
>>
>> 1) it is small...I can incl
>
> Finally, consider wax (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html). In my
> view, this is *exactly* what python needs, and its not being maintained
> anymore as far as I can tell. What I like about it is:
>
> 1) it is small...I can include the entire wax distribution in my app
> with only a 7
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just wondering on what peoples opinions are of the GUIs avaiable for
> Python?
>
> All I am doing is prompting users for some data (listbox, radio
> buttons, text box, ect...). Then I will have some text output, maybe
> a scrolling text
On May 24, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Brian Blais wrote:
> Then there is Dabo, which I personally have had problems with. I
> am looking for a
> pythonic, professional looking GUI framework. I first tried dabo
> with python 2.4,
> and had to install sqlite, which seemed a bit odd for trying to
> j
On 2007-05-24, Brian Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to ask the Python community about this, because it
> seems to me that there is a real need that is not being met
> very effectively. [...] "...but wx is written in C++ and
> definitely shows, even in the Python port". It's just not
Peter Decker wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Shameless plug: consider using Dabo on top of wxPython - we feel it
>> makes wxPython even easier and more pythonic, but admittedly there's a
>> bit of a learning curve there too. Even though Dabo is a full
>> applicatio
On May 21, 10:50 am, brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Just wondering on what peoples opinions are of the GUIs avaiable for
> > Python?
>
> We have used wxPython with great results. It's cross platform. Can use
> native OS widgets and is easy to program. Compiles easi
On 5/21/07, Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shameless plug: consider using Dabo on top of wxPython - we feel it
> makes wxPython even easier and more pythonic, but admittedly there's a
> bit of a learning curve there too. Even though Dabo is a full
> application framework originally meant
Well wxPython offers all of the above. They use XRC which is a XML
file which can be loaded inside the GUI, that auto-creates the
components + layout for you. It also supports creating the gui
programatically, which might be very handy when your layout is
undetermined or changes when users select o
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 18:23 +0200, Petr Muller wrote:
> There's PyQt thingy, imho very good and easy to learn/use, but still
> powerful. I've used it for a small gui-oriented project with almost no
> problems and it worked like a charm. However, sometimes I had troubles
> finding useful document
Hello,
My 2 cents contribution:
To me all toolkits offer nice features. It's just a matter of choice
depending on your needs.
I've personally chosen pyGTK and I use it successfully on
Linux/windows/MacOsX for my home grown softs.
The reasons of my choice:
- It looks the same on all platform (actu
Kevin Walzer wrote:
> 2. wxPython is big, harder to learn than Tkinter, but looks good on Mac,
> Windows, and *Nix. It will require users to install a lot of extra stuff
> (or you'll have to bundle the extra stuff).
PyInstaller builds binaries beautifully from raw py source. No need to
bundle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ultimately, is it worth downloading and learning some of the packages
> avaiable for Python, or should I just stick to the Tkinter stuff that
> is included.
It depends. Are you selling your application commercially/closed-source
or is it freeware/open-source? Are you d
On 2007-05-21, Cameron Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While PyQt is plenty wonderful, Tkinter's more than adequate,
> given the requirements you've described.
Tkinter is easier to use for simple things. You just have to
try not to think about the fact that it's pulling a complete
Tcl interpr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just wondering on what peoples opinions are of the GUIs avaiable for
> Python?
Python has, I believe, 4 compelling choices for GUI library: Tkinter,
wxPython, PyQt, and PyGTK. Like everything in life, each has their
relative merits and downsides. Briefly, here are my f
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Just wondering on what peoples opinions are of the GUIs avaiable for
>Python?
>
>All I am doing is prompting users for some data (listbox, radio
>buttons, text box, ect...). Then I will have some text output, maybe
>a scrolling text me
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just wondering on what peoples opinions are of the GUIs avaiable for
> Python?
>
> All I am doing is prompting users for some data (listbox, radio
> buttons, text box, ect...). Then I will have some text output, maybe
> a scrolling text message as things are happening.
On 21 May 2007 08:39:44 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>All I am doing is prompting users for some data (listbox, radio
>buttons, text box, ect...). Then I will have some text output, maybe
>a scrolling text message as things are happening.
>
>I have some minor things I need to do, for example,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just wondering on what peoples opinions are of the GUIs avaiable for
> Python?
We have used wxPython with great results. It's cross platform. Can use
native OS widgets and is easy to program. Compiles easily to exe
binaries for Windows users as well.
Best of luck,
B
Just wondering on what peoples opinions are of the GUIs avaiable for
Python?
All I am doing is prompting users for some data (listbox, radio
buttons, text box, ect...). Then I will have some text output, maybe
a scrolling text message as things are happening.
I have some minor things I need to
34 matches
Mail list logo
