> > Finally, consider wax (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html). In my > view, this is *exactly* what python needs, and its not being maintained > anymore as far as I can tell. What I like about it is: > > 1) it is small...I can include the entire wax distribution in my app > with only a 780k footprint. > 2) it is a very thin layer on wx, so when something doesn't quite work, > I can immediately fall back onto wx, mixing and matching wax and wx > objects. it's just that the wax objects have more pythonic calling and > use properties >
Sorry I don't know wax, but I wonder "a GUI designer without screenshots", is that Pythonic ;-) cheers, Stef -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
