On 2007-05-24, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Finally, consider wax (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html). In my
>> view, this is *exactly* what python needs, and its not being maintained
>> anymore as far as I can tell. What I like about it is:
>>
>> 1) it is small...I can include the entire wax distribution in
>> my app with only a 780k footprint.
>>
>> 2) it is a very thin layer on wx, so when something doesn't quite work,
>> I can immediately fall back onto wx, mixing and matching wax and wx
>> objects. it's just that the wax objects have more pythonic calling and
>> use properties
>
> Sorry I don't know wax, but I wonder "a GUI designer without
> screenshots", is that Pythonic ;-)
Uh, wha?
Who are you quoting about the screenshots?
Wax isn't a "GUI designer", and I'm a bit lost as to what
screenshots have to do with the topic at hand.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm changing the
at CHANNEL ... But all I get
visi.com is commercials for "RONCO
MIRACLE BAMBOO STEAMERS"!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
