Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2007-05-24, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Finally, consider wax (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html). In my >>> view, this is *exactly* what python needs, and its not being maintained >>> anymore as far as I can tell. What I like about it is: >>> >>> 1) it is small...I can include the entire wax distribution in >>> my app with only a 780k footprint. >>> >>> 2) it is a very thin layer on wx, so when something doesn't quite work, >>> I can immediately fall back onto wx, mixing and matching wax and wx >>> objects. it's just that the wax objects have more pythonic calling and >>> use properties >> Sorry I don't know wax, but I wonder "a GUI designer without >> screenshots", is that Pythonic ;-) > > Uh, wha? > quote original message: "I am looking for a pythonic, professional looking GUI framework." > Who are you quoting about the screenshots? Sorry, maybe I'm not Pythonic enough, but talking about "GUI framework", the first thing I want to see are screenshots.
cheers, Stef Mientki > > Wax isn't a "GUI designer", and I'm a bit lost as to what > screenshots have to do with the topic at hand. > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
