Den lördagen den 2:e november 2013 kl. 21:19:44 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but
>
> >in honesty the gui editor of python should have what i propose, a parser
>
> >that indent automati
Den lördagen den 2:e november 2013 kl. 21:19:44 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but
>
> >in honesty the gui editor of python should have what i propose, a parser
>
> >that indent automati
Op 02-11-13 21:19, Tim Roberts schreef:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but
>> in honesty the gui editor of python should have what i propose, a parser
>> that indent automaticly at loops, functions and end.
>
> Many edi
jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but
>in honesty the gui editor of python should have what i propose, a parser
>that indent automaticly at loops, functions and end.
Many editors do that. Vim, which is what I use, certainly do
On Friday, November 1, 2013 4:47:40 PM UTC+5:30, Alister wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:07:14 -0700, rusi wrote:
> > Also others (Alister?) were double-space-reply-posting as well. When
> > you mean to point out a behavior without getting personal, it helps to
> > point out all instances of that
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:07:14 -0700, rusi wrote:
>
> Also others (Alister?) were double-space-reply-posting as well. When
> you mean to point out a behavior without getting personal, it helps to
> point out all instances of that behavior. Otherwise it looks like you
> are going for someone, when
On 31/10/2013 2:14 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Well i ain't going to change
Thanks for your honesty. As I use an actual standards-compliant
newsreader, I can now safely killfile you and never have to notice your
laziness again.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
On 30/10/2013 8:19 PM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
It is quite simple i could program it in a day...
There is certainly nothing stopping you from doing so. Once finished, I
recommend placing it on PyPI; if it reaches a critical mass of downloads
that support your thesis that "it will sav
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 7:31:14 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 31/10/2013 11:40, rusi wrote:
> > Please treat python as a given -- like the sun, moon and taxes."
> You missed the most obvious one, trolls :)
:D
Only that's not an element but a set -- trolls, nuts, dicks, philosopher
On 31/10/2013 11:40, rusi wrote:
Please treat python as a given -- like the sun, moon and taxes."
You missed the most obvious one, trolls :)
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 4:42:15 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 31-10-13 08:37, rusi schreef:
> > 2. Antoon: I was a bit surprised at your siding with the indentation
> > business.
> > As an old-geezer programmer I can think of a number of reasons why,
> > indentation=structure is a
Op 31-10-13 08:37, rusi schreef:
> On Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:37:31 AM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 30-10-13 21:52, Ned Batchelder schreef:
>>> On 10/30/13 3:59 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 30-10-13 20:13, Jonas schreef:
> No it isn't...
> The programmers of the tools on ei
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:41:41 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 31/10/2013 07:37, rusi wrote:
> > If Mark had not been rude to Jonas and explained to him at a little more
> > length, maybe he would not be assholing in full-blast.
> What rubbish. The OP was asked repeatedly, first by
On 31/10/2013 07:37, rusi wrote:
If Mark had not been rude to Jonas and explained to him at a little more
length, maybe he would not be assholing in full-blast.
What rubbish. The OP was asked repeatedly, first by Dave Angel and then
by myself, not to post double spaced crap. He simply ref
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:37:31 AM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 30-10-13 21:52, Ned Batchelder schreef:
> > On 10/30/13 3:59 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> >> Op 30-10-13 20:13, Jonas schreef:
> >>> No it isn't...
> >>> The programmers of the tools on either of side will have to adapt.
> >
On 30/10/2013 12:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> No that is not my problem, apparently so it is that the newsreader
> constructors do not like the competition of Google groups otherwise they
> would had written the five lines of codes necessary to remove the empty
> linebreaks.
> I li
Op 30-10-13 21:52, Ned Batchelder schreef:
> On 10/30/13 3:59 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 30-10-13 20:13, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
>>>
>>> No it isn't...
>>> The programmers of the tools on either of side will have to adapt.
>>> I wish it would be Google but it could be a database prob
On 10/30/13 3:59 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 30-10-13 20:13, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:05:07 UTC+1 skrev Mark
Lawrence:
On 30/10/2013 18:43, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
And ***that is not by having every stupid anal monkey sitting
manual
Op 30-10-13 20:13, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:05:07 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
On 30/10/2013 18:43, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
And ***that is not by having every stupid anal monkey sitting manually removing
linebreaks by hand***
I
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:09:45 UTC+1 skrev Antoon Pardon:
> Op 30-10-13 19:02, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 18:44:20 UTC+1 skrev MRAB:
>
> >> On 30/10/2013 16:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>> Den onsdagen den
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:05:07 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 18:43, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > And ***that is not by having every stupid anal monkey sitting manually
> > removing linebreaks by hand***
>
> >
>
> > Is that understood?
>
> >
>
>
>
> No
Op 30-10-13 19:02, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 18:44:20 UTC+1 skrev MRAB:
On 30/10/2013 16:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
No that is not my problem, apparently so i
On 30/10/2013 18:43, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
And ***that is not by having every stupid anal monkey sitting manually removing
linebreaks by hand***
Is that understood?
Nobody would have to remove line breaks by hand if you, yes you
jonasthornvall at GMAIL.COM didn't use a tool that
Op 30-10-13 16:50, Grant Edwards schreef:
On 2013-10-30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Because it is a pain in the ass. Now suddenly my program doesn't work
because I somehow inserted a tab instead of spaces.
Then don't do that.
I'm only half-kidding. Inserting incorrect tokens into program source
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 19:01:40 UTC+1 skrev Antoon Pardon:
> Op 30-10-13 17:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>
> >>
>
> >> I have no need to implement a newsreader as I can quite happily send a
Op 30-10-13 17:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com schreef:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
I have no need to implement a newsreader as I can quite happily send and
receive data using Thunderbird. There are several other similar email
options available.
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 18:44:20 UTC+1 skrev MRAB:
> On 30/10/2013 16:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>
> > No that is not my problem, apparently so it is that the newsreader
> > constructors do
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 18:44:20 UTC+1 skrev MRAB:
> On 30/10/2013 16:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>
> > No that is not my problem, apparently so it is that the newsreader
> > constructors do
On 30/10/2013 16:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
No that is not my problem, apparently so it is that the newsreader constructors
do not like the competition of Google groups otherwise they would had written
the five
On 10/30/2013 08:22 AM, Alister wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:42:37 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 30-10-13 13:17, Chris Angelico schreef:
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoon Pardon
>>> wrote:
>>> I broadly agree with your post (I'm of the school of thought that
>>> braces are better
Super Kushal!
Below is the result of that
First the original
Then emacs' cleaned up version!
-Original --
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 10:00:47 PM UTC+5:30, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> rusi writes:
>
>
>
> > On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:05:29 PM UT
On 30/10/2013 16:16, rusi wrote:
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:27:08 PM UTC+5:30, jonas.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:54:19 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
The simplest solution is that you stop posting, as you've been spewing
this double spaced crap all day and
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 17:22:23 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 15:57, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:54:19 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>
> >> On 30/10/2013 15:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>> Den ons
rusi writes:
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:05:29 PM UTC+5:30, Jonas Thornval wrote:
>> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>> > On 30/10/2013 14:31, Jonas Thornval wrote:
>> > Would you please be kind enough to read, digest and action this
>> > https:/
On 30/10/2013 15:57, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:54:19 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
On 30/10/2013 15:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:54:19 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 15:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>
> >> On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:07:47 +, Alister wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:56:32 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
>> Op 30-10-13 15:22, Alister schreef:
>>> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:42:37 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>>
Op 30-10-13 13:17, Chris Angelico schreef:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:27:08 PM UTC+5:30, jonas.t...@gmail.com wrote:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:54:19 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> > The simplest solution is that you stop posting, as you've been spewing
> > this double spaced crap all day and show no inclination to do
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:51:58 UTC+1 skrev Alister:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:35:29 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
>
>
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark
>
> > Lawrence:
>
> >> On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>
>
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:57:08 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:54:19 UTC+1 skrev Mark
> Lawrence:
>> On 30/10/2013 15:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark
>> > Lawrence:
>>
>> >> On 3
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:56:32 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 30-10-13 15:22, Alister schreef:
>> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:42:37 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>
>>> Op 30-10-13 13:17, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoon Pardon
wrote:
I broadly agree with
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:54:19 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 15:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>
> >> On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:50:43 UTC+1 skrev Grant Edwards:
> On 2013-10-30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
> > Op 30-10-13 08:07, Tim Roberts schreef:
>
> >> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for
>
> >>
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:35:29 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark
> Lawrence:
>> On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Would you please be kind enough to read, digest and action this
>>
>> https://wiki.pyth
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:35:29 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
>
> > On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Would you please be kind enough to read, digest
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:05:29 PM UTC+5:30, Jonas Thornval wrote:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> > On 30/10/2013 14:31, Jonas Thornval wrote:
> > Would you please be kind enough to read, digest and action this
> > https://wiki.python.org/moin
On 2013-10-30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 30-10-13 08:07, Tim Roberts schreef:
>> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for
>>> the programming language it can be excluded, but it is a courtesy to
>>> the programmer and could ea
On 30/10/2013 15:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you please be kind enough to read, digest and action this
https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPyth
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 16:09:25 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Would you please be kind enough to read, digest and action this
>
> https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython
>
>
>
> TIA.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Pyt
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:31:04 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 15:22:50 UTC+1 skrev Alister:
>> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:42:37 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Op 30-10-13 13:17, Chris Angelico schreef:
>>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Anto
On 30/10/2013 14:31, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you please be kind enough to read, digest and action this
https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython
TIA.
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
Ma
Op 30-10-13 15:22, Alister schreef:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:42:37 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
>> Op 30-10-13 13:17, Chris Angelico schreef:
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoon Pardon
>>> wrote:
>>> I broadly agree with your post (I'm of the school of thought that
>>> braces are better
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 15:22:50 UTC+1 skrev Alister:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:42:37 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
>
>
> > Op 30-10-13 13:17, Chris Angelico schreef:
>
> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoon Pardon
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> I broadly agree with your post (I'm
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:11:17 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:08:11 UTC+1 skrev
> jonas.t...@gmail.com:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
>
> >
>
> > > jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:42:37 +0100, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 30-10-13 13:17, Chris Angelico schreef:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoon Pardon
>> wrote:
>> I broadly agree with your post (I'm of the school of thought that
>> braces are better than indentation for delimiting blocks), but
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:08:11 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
>> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>
> I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but
> in honesty the gui editor of python should ha
On 10/30/13 6:13 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:00:30 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
On 30/10/2013 09:52, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Please stop sending us double spaced crap.
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world
Op 30-10-13 13:17, Chris Angelico schreef:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoon Pardon
> wrote:
>> Because it is a pain in the ass. Now suddenly my program doesn't work
>> because I somehow inserted a tab instead of spaces.
>
> I broadly agree with your post (I'm of the school of thought th
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoon Pardon
wrote:
> Because it is a pain in the ass. Now suddenly my program doesn't work
> because I somehow inserted a tab instead of spaces.
I broadly agree with your post (I'm of the school of thought that
braces are better than indentation for delimiting
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:43:03 PM UTC+5:30, jonas.t...@gmail.com wrote:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:00:30 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
* * Please stop sending us double spaced crap.
* * Mark Lawrence
* I am not sure what you want.
And then again
* You want me to remove the
Op 30-10-13 08:07, Tim Roberts schreef:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for
>> the programming language it can be excluded, but it is a courtesy to
>> the programmer and could easily be transformed to indents automaticly,
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:00:30 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 09:52, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Please stop sending us double spaced crap.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Python is the second best programming language in the world.
>
> But the best has yet to be i
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:08 PM, wrote:
> Well Tim ***one could argue*** why not do a (i think it is called parser)
> that react to "loop", "end" and "function". And lazy like me do not have to
> think about "what is not part of program".
Python actually does have a symbol for what you're thin
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:11:17 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:08:11 UTC+1 skrev
> jonas.t...@gmail.com:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
>
> >
>
> > > jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:00:30 UTC+1 skrev Mark Lawrence:
> On 30/10/2013 09:52, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Please stop sending us double spaced crap.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Python is the second best programming language in the world.
>
> But the best has yet to be i
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:08:11 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
>
> > jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for
>
> >the programming language it can be excluded, but it is a courtesy to
>
> >the programmer and could
On 30/10/2013 09:52, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Please stop sending us double spaced crap.
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 10:48:36 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 09:52:16 UTC+1 skrev
> jonas.t...@gmail.com:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
>
> >
>
> > > jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 09:52:16 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
>
> > jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
> jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for
>
> >the programming language it can be excluded, but it is a courtesy to
>
> >the programmer and could
jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for
>the programming language it can be excluded, but it is a courtesy to
>the programmer and could easily be transformed to indents automaticly,
>that is removed before the compiliation/interpre
On 29/10/2013 16:11, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
> Den tisdagen den 29:e oktober 2013 kl. 21:08:39 UTC+1 skrev
> jonas.t...@gmail.com:
>> Den tisdagen den 29:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:24:57 UTC+1 skrev Dave Angel:
>
> They could had used print and prinln from basic? I do not want new line
> ev
Neil Cerutti wrote:
Get in the habit of not using the semicolon to end lines.
Also, you don't need to put parentheses around the
conditions of while and if statements.
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10/29/13 4:08 PM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for the
programming language it can be excluded, but it is a courtesy to the programmer
and could easily be transformed to indents automaticly, that is removed before
the c
On 29/10/2013 20:11, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not want new line everytime i write out some terms.
I wish you'd apply that thinking to your posts.
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
Mark Lawrence
On 2013-10-29, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Got the script working though :D, good start. It seem though
> that Python automaticly add linebreaks after printout. Is there
> a way to not have print command change line? Or must i build up
> a string/strings for later printout?
print takes an
Den tisdagen den 29:e oktober 2013 kl. 21:08:39 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den tisdagen den 29:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:24:57 UTC+1 skrev Dave Angel:
>
> > On 29/10/2013 14:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > (Deleting hundreds of quad-spaced garbage. Please
Den tisdagen den 29:e oktober 2013 kl. 20:24:57 UTC+1 skrev Dave Angel:
> On 29/10/2013 14:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> (Deleting hundreds of quad-spaced garbage. Please be more considerate
>
> of others if you choose to use buggy googlegroups, maybe starting by
>
> studying:
On 29/10/2013 14:35, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
(Deleting hundreds of quad-spaced garbage. Please be more considerate
of others if you choose to use buggy googlegroups, maybe starting by
studying:
)
Please indent by 4 columns, not 1. Since indentation is how scope is
specified in Python,
Den tisdagen den 29:e oktober 2013 kl. 19:23:28 UTC+1 skrev
jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den tisdagen den 29:e oktober 2013 kl. 19:09:03 UTC+1 skrev Neil Cerutti:
>
> > On 2013-10-29, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > I have a 25 row javascript that i try to convert to python to get i
Den tisdagen den 29:e oktober 2013 kl. 19:09:03 UTC+1 skrev Neil Cerutti:
> On 2013-10-29, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I have a 25 row javascript that i try to convert to python to get into the
> > language but i run into problem i do not understand howto reach outer loop
> > after f
On 2013-10-29, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have a 25 row javascript that i try to convert to python to get into the
> language but i run into problem i do not understand howto reach outer loop
> after finnish inner loop, in fact i do not understand when finished. The
> javascript i try
I have a 25 row javascript that i try to convert to python to get into the
language but i run into problem i do not understand howto reach outer loop
after finnish inner loop, in fact i do not understand when finished. The
javascript i try to conver is below.
#!/usr/bin/python
import math
# Fu
84 matches
Mail list logo
