[ActivePython] Add Qt/PyQt and wxWidgets/wxPython?

Hello I upgraded to ActivePython 2.7.2.5, and would like to get started learning about Qt and wxWidgets in Python. I have a couple of question: 1. Are there obvious reasons to choose either QT/PyQt or wxWidgets/wxPython? I have the impression that Qt is a richer GUI than wxWidgets, but it could

Re: [ActivePython] Upgrading fails

On 8/6/2013 6:12 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello, I already posted in their forum, but got no reply and figured some people here might have experienced this too. I'm currently running ActivePython 2.5.1.1 on my XP Pro host. After downloading and running the installer to 2.7.2.5, I get the foll

[ActivePython] Upgrading fails

Hello, I already posted in their forum, but got no reply and figured some people here might have experienced this too. I'm currently running ActivePython 2.5.1.1 on my XP Pro host. After downloading and running the installer to 2.7.2.5, I get the following error message: "Windows

Re: ANN: ActivePython 3.2.2.3 is now available

On 5/1/13 8:01 AM, Robert wrote: Will this be the last one? It has been two years. Hard to say. AS has been focusing on cloud-based stuff lately. ActivePerl hasn't been updated for a long time either. ActiveTcl is still maintained. --Kevin -- Kevin Walzer Code by Kevin/Mobile Code by Kevi

Re: ANN: ActivePython 3.2.2.3 is now available

Will this be the last one? It has been two years. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

ANN: ActivePython 3.2.2.3 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 3.2.2.3, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 3.2. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-3.2.2.3 == New Features &

Re: ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Robert wrote: > Is it possible to install the 2 and 3 series side by side? > Yup. Moreover, ActivePython includes a tool called `pythonselect` that can be used to set the "current" version of Python, https://github.com/ActiveState/pythonselect

Re: ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

Why not use Virtualenv ? http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Robert wrote: > Is it possible to install the 2 and 3 series side by side? > > -- > Robert > > > -- > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

In article , Melton Low wrote: [...] > On Mac OS X, a link is automatically installed in /usr/local/bin for each > version of the Python executables, ie python2.7 for the 2.7.x and python3.2 > for 3.2.x. Just invoke your script with the appropriate Python version. > eg. python3.2 yourscript t

Re: ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

It's definitely possible. I've done it myself. On Jul 25, 2011 8:21 PM, "Robert" wrote: > Is it possible to install the 2 and 3 series side by side? > > -- > Robert > > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Melton Low wrote: > It's probably impractical.  You would need a pair for each version of Python > installed, ie. (PYTHON26PATH,PYTHON26HOME) for 2.6.x, > (PYTHON27PATH,PYTHON27HOME) for 2.7.x, for 3.1.x, for 3.2.x, etc). You could set up a script for each ve

Re: ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Web Dreamer wrote: > John Roth a écrit ce mardi 26 juillet 2011 14:00 dans <75342033- > abbb-4d59-9654-96d5031dc...@r28g2000prb.googlegroups.com> : > > > On Jul 25, 8:18 pm, Ned Deily wrote: > >> In article , Robert > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Is it possible to inst

Re: ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

On Jul 25, 8:18 pm, Ned Deily wrote: > In article , Robert > wrote: > > > Is it possible to install the 2 and 3 series side by side? > > Probably.  On Mac OS X, t's certainly possible to install any python.org > versions side by side, even multiple versions of 2 and 3.  That's one of > the advant

Re: ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

In article , Robert wrote: > Is it possible to install the 2 and 3 series side by side? Probably. On Mac OS X, t's certainly possible to install any python.org versions side by side, even multiple versions of 2 and 3. That's one of the advantages of the Python framework build layout on OS X

ActivePython: multiple versions on OSX?

Is it possible to install the 2 and 3 series side by side? -- Robert -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

ANN: ActivePython 3.2.1.2 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 3.2.1.2, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 3.2. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-3.2.1.2 == (combining with the very recently released 3.

ANN: ActivePython 2.5.6.10 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.5.6.10, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.5. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-2.5.6.10 === New Features &

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.7.20 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.6.7.20, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.6. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePythonEE-2.6.7.20 = New Features &

ANN: ActivePython 2.7.2.5 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.7.2.5, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.7. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-2.7.2.5 == New Features &

Re: Can not uninstall activepython. Missing msi ?

Looks like this is resolved for you, http://community.activestate.com/node/6558 On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:13 AM, goldtech wrote: > Hi, > > I want to uninstall Active Python 2.6.2.2 and upgrade. Certain things > are not working and it's probably time to upgrade anyway. When I try > to uninstall i

Can not uninstall activepython. Missing msi ?

Hi, I want to uninstall Active Python 2.6.2.2 and upgrade. Certain things are not working and it's probably time to upgrade anyway. When I try to uninstall it says "missing msi". Before I delete all the folders and clean the registry out is there something I can try to have a normal or more grace

ANN: ActivePython 3.2.0.0 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 3.2.0.0, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 3.2. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-3.2.0.0 == New Features &

ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.4 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.7.1.4, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.7. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-2.7.1.4 == *Release date: 14-Feb-2011* New Fea

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.6.18 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.6.6.18, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.6. Among other updates, this releases brings "postinstall" support to PyPM to facilitate installation of modules such as PyIMSL. http://www.activestate.com/ac

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.3 is now available

ed 8.5 on windows and included > tkinter.ttk module. Ok, good to know. >> I did this for ActivePython 2.7, >> >>>>> import Tkinter >>>>> root = Tkinter.Tk() >>>>> root.tk.eval('info patchlevel') >> '8.5.9' >

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.3 is now available

On 12/13/2010 4:23 PM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote: The PSF 3.1 Windows installer ships with tcl/tk 8.5 and ttk support. Maybe that was changed in 3.1.3. No, 3.1 (not sure of 3.0) has always used 8.5 on windows and included tkinter.ttk module. I did this for ActivePython 2.7, import

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.3 is now available

taller ships with tcl/tk 8.5 and ttk support. > You ought to too. ActivePython (APy) 2.5+/3.1+ already use Tcl/Tk 8.5 ... I was referring to the PSF installers (hence the mismatch in versions between APy and PSF). Maybe that was changed in 3.1.3. >> but that should not be an iss

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.3 is now available

On 12/13/2010 1:48 PM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote: We generally build with the latest compatible version of extensions (except for Tcl/Tk on 2.5/2.6/3.1 as python.org still uses 8.4) ... The PSF 3.1 Windows installer ships with tcl/tk 8.5 and ttk support. You ought to too. but that should not

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.3 is now available

Sridhar, > You can find the versions used in ActivePython here, > http://docs.activestate.com/activepython/2.7/whatsincluded.html Thank you - that page answered my questions. Malcolm -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.3 is now available

On 2010-12-13, at 10:38 AM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote: > [SRID] Release notes for 2.7.1.3 [...] > [SRID] - Upgrade to Tcl/Tk 8.5.9 (`changes <http://wiki.tcl.tk/26961>`_) > Do the Windows versions of ActivePython 2.7.1.3 have different versions > of Tcl/Tk, sqlite3(.dll), and/or

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.3 is now available

Sridhar, Do the Windows versions of ActivePython 2.7.1.3 have different versions of Tcl/Tk, sqlite3(.dll), and/or openssl (_ssl.pyd?) than the python.org builds of Python 2.7.1? Thank you, Malcolm -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

ANN: ActivePython 2.7.1.3 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.7.1.3, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.7. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-2.7.1.3 == *Release date: 6-Dec-2010* New Fea

ANN: ActivePython 3.1.3.5 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 3.1.3.5, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 3.1. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-3.1.3.5 == *Release date: 6-Dec-2010* New Fea

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.6.17 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.6.6.17, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.6. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads What's New in ActivePython-2.6.6.17 === *Release date: 19-Nov-2010* New Fea

Re: Making ActivePython and Python co-exist on Windows

On 2010-11-07, at 12:34 PM, Benjamin Kaplan wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:25 PM, CWC wrote: >> I'm new to Python. Is it possible to make ActivePython 3.12 and >> Python 3.12 co-exist on Windows? I've got an app which requires the >> former, but I want to

Re: Making ActivePython and Python co-exist on Windows

On Nov 7, 12:34 pm, Benjamin Kaplan wrote: > ActivePython is the same thing as the "normal" Python. They just > bundle the standard Python 3.1.2 distribution with a couple of extra > packages in a convenient installer for you. Thanks, Ben! Based on your response, I deci

Re: Making ActivePython and Python co-exist on Windows

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:25 PM, CWC wrote: > I'm new to Python.  Is it possible to make ActivePython 3.12 and > Python 3.12 co-exist on Windows?  I've got an app which requires the > former, but I want to stay with the latter, since I'm interested in > getting into dev

Making ActivePython and Python co-exist on Windows

I'm new to Python. Is it possible to make ActivePython 3.12 and Python 3.12 co-exist on Windows? I've got an app which requires the former, but I want to stay with the latter, since I'm interested in getting into development. The main area of collision appears to be the Reg

Re: ANN: ActivePython 3.1.2.4 (with PyPM) is now available

On 2010-10-27, at 11:39 AM, John Nagle wrote: > On 10/27/2010 11:26 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote: >> ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 3.1.2.4, a complete, >> ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 3.1 > ... > >> New Features & Upgrades

Re: ANN: ActivePython 3.1.2.4 (with PyPM) is now available

On 10/27/2010 11:26 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote: ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 3.1.2.4, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 3.1 ... New Features & Upgrades - [Windows] Installer upgrade: automatically uninstall previous versions - Bug #8

ANN: ActivePython 3.1.2.4 (with PyPM) is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 3.1.2.4, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 3.1. A major update in this release is that PyPM (ActiveState's Python Package Manager) is now included with full support for installing Python 3 packages.

ANN: ActivePython 2.7.0.2 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.7.0.2, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.7. http://www.activestate.com/activepython What's New in ActivePython-2.7.0.2 == *Release date: 25-Aug-2010* New Features &

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.6.15 is now available

ActiveState is pleased to announce ActivePython 2.6.6.15, a complete, ready-to-install binary distribution of Python 2.6.6. http://www.activestate.com/activepython What's New in ActivePython-2.6.6.15 === *Release date: 25-Aug-2010* New Features &

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.5.14 is now available

We are pleased to announce the availability of ActivePython 2.6.5.14. http://www.activestate.com/activepython This is a minor release with several bug fixes. As usual, it includes an updated Python Package Manager (PyPM) with updates to essential packages such as Distribute (a compatible

ANN: ActivePython 2.7.0.1 is now available

We are pleased to announce the availability of ActivePython 2.7.0.1. http://www.activestate.com/activepython This release corresponds to the recently released Python 2.7, and, like ActivePython 2.6, includes the Python Package Manager (PyPM) with essential packages such as Distribute (a

ANN: ActivePython 2.7.0c1.0 is now available

We are pleased to announce the availability of ActivePython 2.7.0c1.0. http://www.activestate.com/activepython This release corresponds to the recently released Python 2.7 RC1, and, like ActivePython 2.6, includes the Python Package Manager (PyPM) with essential packages such as Distribute

Re: ActivePython - how to configure portable framework?

Copy all the files in the ZIP to your USB stick and run INSTALLDIR\python.exe -srid On 5/7/2010 3:24 AM, balzer wrote: I downloaded ActivePython-2.6.5.12-win32-x86.zip, it contains two folders and 3 files: SystemFolder INSTALLDIR sh2.py install.bat _install.py Anyone know how to configure

Re: Movable Python or ActivePython

Balzer, > I just need test a few python scripts. I recommend you look at Movable Python or Portable Python. Malcolm -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Movable Python or ActivePython

inus Idle). Malcolm - Original message - From: "balzer" To: python-list@python.org Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:31:32 +0300 Subject: Re: Movable Python or ActivePython "Sridhar Ratnakumar" wrote in message news:mailman.2638.1273083585.23598.python-l...@python.org... On 2010-0

Re: Movable Python or ActivePython

st@python.org Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:31:32 +0300 Subject: Re: Movable Python or ActivePython "Sridhar Ratnakumar" wrote in message news:mailman.2638.1273083585.23598.python-l...@python.org... On 2010-05-05, at 5:47 AM, balzer wrote: > I want Python pack that can run without bein

Re: Movable Python or ActivePython

talled. It needs no registry entries and knows the path to all the dlls (system or otherwise) that it uses. Whats about ActivePython http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads? Does it requires installation? The .MSI installer does require installation, but there is also a .ZIP pac

ActivePython - how to configure portable framework?

I downloaded ActivePython-2.6.5.12-win32-x86.zip, it contains two folders and 3 files: SystemFolder INSTALLDIR sh2.py install.bat _install.py Anyone know how to configure this Python environment as "portable application" to work with it without installation, to set a fully-function

Re: ActiveState using different MS runtime files than official Python release? (was Re: Movable Python or ActivePython)

om: "Trent Mick" To: pyt...@bdurham.com Cc: python-list@python.org Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 09:33:05 -0700 Subject: Re: ActiveState using different MS runtime files than official Python release? (was Re: Movable Python or ActivePython) On 10-05-05 5:30 PM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote: > Hi Tre

Re: ActiveState using different MS runtime files than official Python release? (was Re: Movable Python or ActivePython)

On 10-05-05 5:30 PM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote: Hi Trent, On 10-05-05 12:04 PM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote: I just took a look at the ActiveStatre 2.6.5.12 release (zip file version) and noticed that this file does not include the MSVCR90.DLL run time file - it includes MFC*.DLL files instead (and

Re: ActiveState using different MS runtime files than official Python release? (was Re: Movable Python or ActivePython)

Hi Trent, On 10-05-05 12:04 PM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote: >> I just took a look at the ActiveStatre 2.6.5.12 release (zip file >> version) and noticed that this file does not include the MSVCR90.DLL run >> time file - it includes MFC*.DLL files instead (and a different manifest >> file as well). >

Re: ActiveState using different MS runtime files than official Python release? (was Re: Movable Python or ActivePython)

On 10-05-05 12:04 PM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote: I just took a look at the ActiveStatre 2.6.5.12 release (zip file version) and noticed that this file does not include the MSVCR90.DLL run time file - it includes MFC*.DLL files instead (and a different manifest file as well). Can anyone explain wh

ActiveState using different MS runtime files than official Python release? (was Re: Movable Python or ActivePython)

In a recent thread ("Movable Python or ActivePython), Sridhar Ratnakumar pointed out that the ActiveState Python releases can be downloaded as ZIP files vs. MSI files. (Great idea - thank you ActiveState!) > The .MSI installer does require installation, but there is also a .ZIP > pa

Re: Movable Python or ActivePython

that it uses. > Whats about ActivePython http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads? > Does it requires installation? The .MSI installer does require installation, but there is also a .ZIP package which doesn't. It is not visible in the downloads page, but you can always

Re: Movable Python or ActivePython

ActivePython http://www.activestate.com/activepython/downloads? Does it requires installation? Yes. It is the standard distribution with extra stuff added and installed. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Movable Python or ActivePython

I want Python pack that can run without being installed, mostly for testing programs. As I read, Movable Python can run without being installed. It needs no registry entries and knows the path to all the dlls (system or otherwise) that it uses. Whats about ActivePython http

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.5.12 and 3.1.2.3 are now available

We are pleased to announce the availability of both ActivePython 2.6.5.12 and ActivePython 3.1.2.3. http://www.activestate.com/activepython/ Here is what you should know about these two releases: PyWin32: PyWin32 is now included in the 64-bit & Python3 builds! Since we recently upd

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.5.5.7 is now available

On 2010-02-13, at 1:25 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:22:49 -0800, Sridhar Ratnakumar > declaimed the following in > gmane.comp.python.general: > >> I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.5.5.7 is now available for >>

ANN: ActivePython 2.5.5.7 is now available

I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.5.5.7 is now available for download from: http://www.activestate.com/activepython/ This is a minor release with several updates and fixes. Changes in 2.5.5.7 -- - Upgrade to Python 2.5.5 - Upgrade to Tcl/Tk 8.5.8 - Upgra

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.4.10 is now available

On 2010-02-05, at 6:31 AM, Tommy Grav wrote: > > On Feb 5, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote: > >> I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.6.4.10 is now available for >> download from: > >> On w

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.4.10 is now available

On Feb 5, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote: > I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.6.4.10 is now available for > download from: > On what platforms does ActivePython run? > ---- > > ActivePython includes insta

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.4.10 is now available

I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.6.4.10 is now available for download from: http://www.activestate.com/activepython/ This is a minor release with several updates and fixes. Changes in 2.6.4.10 --- - PyPM is now included in 64-bit Windows and Linux builds - In

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.4.8 is now available

I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.6.4.8 is now available for download from: http://www.activestate.com/activepython/ This is a patch release that updates ActivePython to core Python 2.6.4. We recommend that you try 2.6 version first. See the release notes for full details:

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.3.7 (and PyPM) is now available

On Oct 16, 2:23 pm, srid wrote: > > Does that mean that PyPM installs ONLY from the activestate repository > > and not from url or .tar.gz or dir/ ? > > This is correct. Although it may change in the future. Note that Sridhar, activestate folks, if you want people to switch to PyPM, make it UN

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.3.7 (and PyPM) is now available

On Oct 16, 3:30 pm, denis wrote: > On Oct 7, 2:16 am, "Sridhar Ratnakumar" > wrote: > > > ... > > This release includes a new packaging tool by activestate called Python > > Package Manager (PyPM).PyPM- currently in beta - is the package > > Sridhar, fo

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.3.7 (and PyPM) is now available

On Oct 7, 2:16 am, "Sridhar Ratnakumar" wrote: > ... > This release includes a new packaging tool by activestate called Python > Package Manager (PyPM).PyPM- currently in beta - is the package Sridhar, folks, the ActivePython FAQ says "While you can install most pac

Re: ActivePython 3.1.1.2 vs Python 3.1.1 for OSX?

us which I should use. I am going to start learning > > > Python soon. Are they comparable and I just do a "eenie meenie minie > > > moe"? > > > ActivePython is essentially same as the installers from python.org - > > but it also comes with additional do

Re: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.3.7 (and PyPM) is now available

On Oct 6, 8:16 pm, "Sridhar Ratnakumar" wrote: > I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.6.3.7 is now available for > download from: > >      http://www.activestate.com/activepython/ > > This is a patch-level release that updates ActivePython to core Python &

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.3.7 (and PyPM) is now available

I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.6.3.7 is now available for download from: http://www.activestate.com/activepython/ This is a patch-level release that updates ActivePython to core Python 2.6.3 along with the fixes for a couple of critical regressions that instigated the wo

Re: ActivePython 3.1.1.2 vs Python 3.1.1 for OSX?

On Oct 1, 11:28 am, srid wrote: > On Sep 30, 4:51 pm, Robert Hicks wrote: > > > I am just curious which I should use. I am going to start learning > > Python soon. Are they comparable and I just do a "eenie meenie minie > > moe"? > > ActivePython is

Re: ActivePython 3.1.1.2 vs Python 3.1.1 for OSX?

On Sep 30, 9:28 pm, srid wrote: > On Sep 30, 4:51 pm, Robert Hicks wrote: > > > I am just curious which I should use. I am going to start learning > > Python soon. Are they comparable and I just do a "eenie meenie minie > > moe"? > > ActivePython is

Re: ActivePython 3.1.1.2 vs Python 3.1.1 for OSX?

On Sep 30, 4:51 pm, Robert Hicks wrote: > I am just curious which I should use. I am going to start learning > Python soon. Are they comparable and I just do a "eenie meenie minie > moe"? ActivePython is essentially same as the installers from python.org - but it also co

Re: ActivePython 3.1.1.2 vs Python 3.1.1 for OSX?

On Sep 30, 9:07 pm, Jon Clements wrote: > On 1 Oct, 00:51, Robert Hicks wrote: > > > I am just curious which I should use. I am going to start learning > > Python soon. Are they comparable and I just do a "eenie meenie minie > > moe"? > > > Bob > > First off, a great choice of language to begin t

Re: ActivePython 3.1.1.2 vs Python 3.1.1 for OSX?

On 1 Oct, 00:51, Robert Hicks wrote: > I am just curious which I should use. I am going to start learning > Python soon. Are they comparable and I just do a "eenie meenie minie > moe"? > > Bob First off, a great choice of language to begin trying! Is it your first language (I'm guessing not), or

ActivePython 3.1.1.2 vs Python 3.1.1 for OSX?

I am just curious which I should use. I am going to start learning Python soon. Are they comparable and I just do a "eenie meenie minie moe"? Bob -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

ANN: ActivePython 3.1.1.2 is now available

I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 3.1.1.2 is now available for download from: http://www.activestate.com/activepython/python3/ This is a patch release that updates ActivePython to core Python 3.1.1 We recommend that you try 2.6 version first. See the release notes for full de

ANN: ActivePython 3.1.0.1 is now available

I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 3.1.0.1 is now available for download from: http://www.activestate.com/activepython/python3/ This is a major release that updates ActivePython3 to core Python 3.1. What is ActivePython? ----- ActivePython is ActiveState

ANN: ActivePython 2.6.2.2, 3.1.0b1.0, 2.5.4.4 is now available

I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.6.2.2, 3.1.0b1.0 and 2.5.4.4 are now available for download from: http://www.activestate.com/activepython/ This is a patch release that updates ActivePython to core Python 2.6.2 and 3.1b2. This release also contains updates to Tcl/Tk 8.5.7 an

Re: [ActivePython 2.5.1.1] Why does Python not return first line?

Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: Teletypes, OTOH, really did use one character to advance the platen by a line, and a second to move the print-head to the left. (and may have needed "rub-out" characters to act as timing delays while the print-head moved) I remember writing a printer driver for a

Re: [ActivePython 2.5.1.1] Why does Python not return first line?

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Gilles Ganault wrote: > Hello > > I'm stuck at why Python doesn't return the first line in this simple > regex: > > === > response = "Address :\r\t\t\r\t\t\t3 Abbey Road, > St Johns Wood \r\t\t\tLondon, NW8 9AY\t\t" > > re_address = re.compile('Address > :

Re: [ActivePython 2.5.1.1] Why does Python not return first line?

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:14:00 +0100, Gilles Ganault wrote: >I'm stuck at why Python doesn't return the first line in this simple >regex Found it: Python does extract the token, but displaying it requires removing hidden chars: = response = "Address :\r\t\t\r\t\t\t3 Abbey Road, St Johns Wood \

[ActivePython 2.5.1.1] Why does Python not return first line?

Hello I'm stuck at why Python doesn't return the first line in this simple regex: === response = "Address :\r\t\t\r\t\t\t3 Abbey Road, St Johns Wood \r\t\t\tLondon, NW8 9AY\t\t" re_address = re.compile('Address :.+?(.+?)',re.I | re.S | re.M) address = re_address.search(response) if addr

Re: ActivePython or Python from Python.org

Rey Bango wrote: Hi everyone. I noticed that ActiveState has their own variation of Python and was curious if there's a benefit to choosing their version over the version offered via Python.org. Could someone lend some insight? Here is some reasoning I wrote a while back: http://mail.python.o

ActivePython or Python from Python.org

Hi everyone. I noticed that ActiveState has their own variation of Python and was curious if there's a benefit to choosing their version over the version offered via Python.org. Could someone lend some insight? Thanks, Rey... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: ActivePython 2.6.1.1 and 3.0.0.0 released!

Kay Schluehr wrote: On 13 Dez., 00:16, Trent Mick wrote: Note that currently PyWin32 is not included in ActivePython 3.0. Is there any activity in this direction? The PyWin32 CVS tree is getting checkins from Mark Hammond and Roger Upole with a py3k tag. I'm not sure how close the

Re: ActivePython 2.6.1.1 and 3.0.0.0 released!

Hi! M. Hammond said (wrote) said that the work is enormous, because modifications of the C architecture of Python 3 was largely modified. (sorry for my bad english) -- Michel Claveau -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: ActivePython 2.6.1.1 and 3.0.0.0 released!

On 13 Dez., 00:16, Trent Mick wrote: > Note that currently PyWin32 is not included in ActivePython 3.0. Is there any activity in this direction? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

ActivePython 2.6.1.1 and 3.0.0.0 released!

I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.6.1.1 and ActivePython 3.0.0.0 are now available. Details and download links for 2.6 here: http://www.activestate.com/Products/activepython/feature_list.mhtml Details and download links for 3.0 here: http://www.activestate.com/Products/activep

Re: Installation on Vista (Was: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.0.0 is now available)

In the darkest hour on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:53:27 -0800 (PST), Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> screamed: > Strange, I had to. Had you enebled it previously and assinged a > password? > I couldn't use a "runas" command without a password. I never tried the > Administrator-Disabled/Password-Assigned co

Re: Installation on Vista (Was: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.0.0 is now available)

sanator wrote: > > >>> On Nov 17, 5:44 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>> Trent Mick wrote: > > >>>>> Mensanator wrote: > > >>>>>>>> What about Vista? Do you need to use the Administrator account t

Re: Installation on Vista (Was: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.0.0 is now available)

gt; >>>> Trent Mick wrote: > >>>>> Mensanator wrote: > >>>>>>>> What about Vista? Do you need to use the Administrator account to > >>>>>>>> install it? > >>>>>>> My currently understanding is that the Act

Re: Installation on Vista (Was: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.0.0 is now available)

gt;>>> What about Vista? Do you need to use the Administrator account to >>>>>>>> install it? >>>>>>> My currently understanding is that the ActivePython installer will >>>>>>> prompt for administrator privileges if required. I know

Re: Installation on Vista (Was: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.0.0 is now available)

se the Administrator account to > >>>>>> install it? > >>>>> My currently understanding is that the ActivePython installer will > >>>>> prompt for administrator privileges if required. I know that if the > >>>>> current us

Re: Installation on Vista (Was: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.0.0 is now available)

Mensanator wrote: > On Nov 17, 5:44 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Trent Mick wrote: >>> Mensanator wrote: >>>>>> What about Vista? Do you need to use the Administrator account to >>>>>> install it? >>>

Re: Installation on Vista (Was: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.0.0 is now available)

On Nov 17, 5:44 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trent Mick wrote: > > Mensanator wrote: > >>>> What about Vista? Do you need to use the Administrator account to > >>>> install it? > >>> My currently understanding is that the A

Re: Installation on Vista (Was: ANN: ActivePython 2.6.0.0 is now available)

Trent Mick wrote: > Mensanator wrote: >>>> What about Vista? Do you need to use the Administrator account to >>>> install it? >>> My currently understanding is that the ActivePython installer will >>> prompt for administrator privileges if required. I

  1   2   >