On 04/05/2016 01:05 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> | >>> from email import ID10T
Thomas, as has been pointed out to you in previous threads it is not
necessary to be rude to be heard.
You are hereby placed in moderation for the Python List mailing list.
Every one else: If you see of
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:28:47 +, Rob Gaddi wrote:
> Charles T. Smith wrote:
>
>> I just tried to write a recursive method in python - am I right that local
>> variables are only lexically local scoped, so sub-instances have the same
>> ones? Is there a way out of that? Do I have to push and
Steven D'Aprano :
> So even in English, capitalisation can make a semantic difference.
It can even make a pronunciation difference: polish vs Polish.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Rolf Camps :
> Op 07-04-16 om 00:03 schreef Marko Rauhamaa:
>> IOW, if I have this class:
>>
>> class A:
>> def f(self):
>> print("f")
>>
>> and this object:
>>
>> a = A()
>>
>> then,
>>
>> a.f
>>
>> is a function that doesn't have a self argument. That functio
Emeka writes:
> Hello All,
>
> import urllib.request
> import re
>
> url = 'https://www.everyday.com/
>
>
>
> req = urllib.request.Request(url)
> resp = urllib.request.urlopen(req)
> respData = resp.read()
>
>
> paragraphs = re.findall(r'\[(.*?)\]',str(respData))
> for eachP in paragraphs:
> p
On Thursday 07 April 2016 13:40, Random832 wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 21:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> And you would have to do something about the unfortunate matter that
>> modules
>> have a reference to the unrestricted __builtins__:
>>
>> py> os.__builtins__['eval']
>>
>
> Well, I tho
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 21:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> And you would have to do something about the unfortunate matter that
> modules
> have a reference to the unrestricted __builtins__:
>
> py> os.__builtins__['eval']
>
Well, I thought that the solution being discussed uses AST to generally
fo
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:58 am, John Pote wrote:
[...]
> I like each assert...() to output helpful information when things go
> wrong. So I have put in quite complicated code to generate the error
> string the assert() method uses only when things go wrong. The normal
> case, when everything is worki
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> And you would have to do something about the unfortunate matter that modules
> have a reference to the unrestricted __builtins__:
>
> py> os.__builtins__['eval']
>
This *in itself* is blocked by the rule against leading-underscore
attribu
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:14 pm, Random832 wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016, at 21:43, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> As Zooko says, Guido's "best argument is that reducing usability (in
>> terms
>> of forbidding language features, especially module import) and reducing
>> the
>> usefulness of extant library c
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>
>> This is the exact sort of shenanigans that it takes to convert
>> recursion into tail recursion - and in MOST cases, it's very little
>> effort to go from there to explicit while loops. That's why TCE is so
>> infrequent
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> On 06.04.2016 01:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> Generally, I refactor code not because the files are getting "too
>> large" (for whatever definition of that term you like), but because
>> they're stretching the file's concept. Every file shou
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 05:56 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Rustom Mody wrote:
>> So here are some examples to illustrate what I am saying:
>>
>> Example 1 -- Ligatures:
>>
>> Python3 gets it right
> flag = 1
> flag
>> 1
Python identifiers are intentionally normalised to reduce secu
Op 07-04-16 om 00:03 schreef Marko Rauhamaa:
Once you look up an object method, it doesn't have a self argument. The
self argument is cooked up for the benefit of the function definition in
the class.
IOW, if I have this class:
class A:
def f(self):
print("f")
and
2016-04-05 20:35 GMT-04:00 majoxd hola :
> me podrían enviar el programa Python spyder para Windows?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Enviado desde Correo de Windows
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
This is an english language list. And besides, your question I could
send the Python p
Emeka writes:
> Hello All,
>
> import urllib.request
> import re
>
> url = 'https://www.everyday.com/
This URL doesn't resolve for me, so I can't reproduce the behaviour.
> I got the below:
> "Coke - Yala Market Branch""NO. 113 IKU BAKR WAY YALA"""
> But what I need is
>
> 'Coke - Yala Market
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
wrote:
>> Example 1 -- Ligatures:
>>
>> Python3 gets it right
> flag = 1
> flag
>> 1
>
> Fascinating; confirmed with
>
> | $ python3
> | Python 3.4.4 (default, Jan 5 2016, 15:35:18)
> | [GCC 5.3.1 20160101] on linux
> | […]
>
> I do
Hello All,
import urllib.request
import re
url = 'https://www.everyday.com/
req = urllib.request.Request(url)
resp = urllib.request.urlopen(req)
respData = resp.read()
paragraphs = re.findall(r'\[(.*?)\]',str(respData))
for eachP in paragraphs:
print("".join(eachP.split(',')[1:-2]))
hi
i have windows 10 and python 3.5.1 and i want to install open cv.
first i go to http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#opencv
and download the opencv_python-3.1.0-cp35-none-win_amd64.whl
from command prompt i install with pip.
pip install \opencv_python-3.1.0-cp35-none-win_amd64.whl
and sho
On 04/06/2016 03:58 PM, John Pote wrote:
I have been writing a very useful test script using the standard Python
'unittest' module. This works fine and has been a huge help in keeping
the system I've been writing fully working even when I make changes that
could break many features of the system.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:16 PM George Trojan - NOAA Federal <
george.tro...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> My basic question is how to document functions created by
> functools.partial, such that the documentation can be viewed not only by
> reading the code. Of course, as the last resort, I could create my o
me podrían enviar el programa Python spyder para Windows?
Enviado desde Correo de Windows
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have been writing a very useful test script using the standard Python
'unittest' module. This works fine and has been a huge help in keeping
the system I've been writing fully working even when I make changes that
could break many features of the system. eg major rewrite of the
interrupt rout
On 06/04/2016 21:38, Mark Lawrence wrote:
No it didn't, it was quite clear from the beginning that he knew squat,
and since then he's admitted that he knows squat. About Python.
I see. According to you:
(1) To have an opinion about a language, you have to know everything in
it 100%, inside
Ian Kelly :
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Not convinced. Probably just an oversight.
>
> It's documented here:
> https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#special-method-lookup
Ok, not an oversight but some inherent trouble with the way object
methods are re
On 04/06/2016 03:08 PM, Random832 wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 16:21, Charles T. Smith wrote:
>> I just tried to write a recursive method in python - am I right that
>> local
>> variables are only lexically local scoped, so sub-instances have the same
>> ones? Is there a way out of that? Do I
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ian Kelly :
>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> It seems to me CPython is being a bit too picky here. Why should it
>>> care if the method is a class method or an object method?
>>
>> Because the purpose of a class
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 16:21, Charles T. Smith wrote:
> I just tried to write a recursive method in python - am I right that
> local
> variables are only lexically local scoped, so sub-instances have the same
> ones? Is there a way out of that? Do I have to push and pop my own
> simulated
> stac
Ian Kelly :
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> It seems to me CPython is being a bit too picky here. Why should it
>> care if the method is a class method or an object method?
>
> Because the purpose of a class is to define the behavior of its
> instances. A function store
On 06/04/2016 18:55, Ned Batchelder wrote:
It took us a while to understand where Bart was coming from, but now we
understand, and we don't have to go around in circles.
No it didn't, it was quite clear from the beginning that he knew squat,
and since then he's admitted that he knows squat.
Charles T. Smith wrote:
> I just tried to write a recursive method in python - am I right that local
> variables are only lexically local scoped, so sub-instances have the same
> ones? Is there a way out of that? Do I have to push and pop my own simulated
> stack frame entry?
You have been bad
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ian Kelly :
>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> Why is a SimpleNamespace object not an iterator even though it
>>> provides __iter__ and __next__?
>>
>> Because Python expects those methods to be defined in the cla
I just tried to write a recursive method in python - am I right that local
variables are only lexically local scoped, so sub-instances have the same
ones? Is there a way out of that? Do I have to push and pop my own simulated
stack frame entry?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
Terry Reedy :
> On 4/6/2016 10:14 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
>> Seriously, Python wouldn't be, couldn't be Turing-complete without
>> "while" (mainly because it doesn't support tail-recursion
>> elimination).
>>
>> Now, if Python had an unlimited range() iterator/iterable, you could
>> use a "for
Ian Kelly :
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Why is a SimpleNamespace object not an iterator even though it
>> provides __iter__ and __next__?
>
> Because Python expects those methods to be defined in the class dict,
> not the instance dict.
The documentation does state
Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 5:17:36 PM UTC+5:30, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> wrote:
>> Rustom Mody wrote:
>> > When python went to full unicode identifers it should have also added
>> > pragmas for which blocks the programmer intended to use -- something
>> > like a charset de
On 4/6/2016 10:14 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Seriously, Python wouldn't be, couldn't be Turing-complete without
"while" (mainly because it doesn't support tail-recursion elimination).
Now, if Python had an unlimited range() iterator/iterable, you could use
a "for" statement to emulate "while".
Hi Erik. It's an Excel file. Thanks for the suggestions. Will check them. -
Maurice
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> However, BartC's No-Buzzword Python doesn't have classes... If he
> allowed for types.SimpleNamespace, we could have:
>
>
> import types
>
> def While(predicate):
>
Chris Angelico :
> This is the exact sort of shenanigans that it takes to convert
> recursion into tail recursion - and in MOST cases, it's very little
> effort to go from there to explicit while loops. That's why TCE is so
> infrequently important that it's just not worth the cost - which in
> th
On 06.04.2016 01:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
Generally, I refactor code not because the files are getting "too
large" (for whatever definition of that term you like), but because
they're stretching the file's concept. Every file should have a
purpose; every piece of code in that file should ideally
Ian Kelly :
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Now, if Python had an unlimited range() iterator/iterable, you could use
>> a "for" statement to emulate "while".
>
> You can already do this.
>
class While:
> ... def __init__(self, predicate):
> ... self._pr
True, but the pure Python and C implementation differ. Is that
intentional? I find the current behaviour confusing. The doc states only
that partial object does not set the __doc__ attribute, not that the
attribute might be ignored. I had a peek at the pydoc module. It uses
inspect to determine th
On 06.04.2016 09:28, Michael Selik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, 2:51 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 05:56 am, Michael Selik wrote:
[Michael]
When you made that suggestion earlier, I immediately guessed that you
were
using PyCharm. I agree that the decision to split into multip
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Random832 wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 14:23, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Chris Angelico :
>>
>> > Plus, anyone could implement a Python interpreter with TCE.
>>
>> Tricky in practice because None is the default return value.
>>
>> If the programmer were careful to
Random832 :
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 14:23, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Chris Angelico :
>> > Plus, anyone could implement a Python interpreter with TCE.
>>
>> Tricky in practice because None is the default return value.
>>
>> If the programmer were careful to return the value of the tail call,
>>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> In other words, you are assuming that the string escaping *in the
>> module* is buggy. Well, duh. This is exactly what I said about not
>> having stupid bugs. The developer of a MySQL binding library shou
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Now, if Python had an unlimited range() iterator/iterable, you could use
> a "for" statement to emulate "while".
You can already do this.
>>> class While:
... def __init__(self, predicate):
... self._predicate = predicate
...
Chris Angelico wrote:
> In other words, you are assuming that the string escaping *in the
> module* is buggy. Well, duh. This is exactly what I said about not
> having stupid bugs. The developer of a MySQL binding library should
> know the *entire* rules for escaping, and, duh, that's going to
> i
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 6:57 PM, George Trojan - NOAA Federal
> wrote:
>
> The module functools has partial() defined as above, then overrides the
> definition by importing partial from _functools. That would explain the
> above behaviour. My question is why?
A couple speculations why an author m
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 14:23, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>
> > Plus, anyone could implement a Python interpreter with TCE.
>
> Tricky in practice because None is the default return value.
>
> If the programmer were careful to return the value of the tail call, it
> can be eliminat
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 12:04, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > type might also be a concern since it can be used to assemble
> > arbitrary classes.
>
> Sadly, this means denying the ability to interrogate an object for its
> type. And no, this won't do
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Michael Selik wrote:
> However, you might want to protect them from a subtle infinite loop or other
> traps that are tough to recover from. If it's an obvious infinity, well,
> that's their own fault. For example, ``range`` stops you from a zero
> step-size, but
Chris Angelico :
> Plus, anyone could implement a Python interpreter with TCE.
Tricky in practice because None is the default return value.
If the programmer were careful to return the value of the tail call, it
can be eliminated.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
George Trojan - NOAA Federal wrote:
> Here is my test program:
>
> ''' generic test '''
>
> import functools
> import inspect
>
> def f():
> '''I am f'''
> pass
>
> g = functools.partial(f)
> g.__doc__ = '''I am g'''
> g.__name__ = 'g'
>
> def partial(func, *args, **keywords):
> d
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> I fully agree. But you don't have to use classes, exceptions,
>> decorators, generators, iterators, closures, comprehensions, meta
>> classes, ... the list of meaningless buzzwords just goes on.
>
> Honestly, hearing you say that makes you
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 10:40:36 AM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 15:34, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > No, please, let's not ask BartC to list these features. We've already
> > well established Bart's point of view, let's not revisit this debate.
> > He prefers very different lang
Here is my test program:
''' generic test '''
import functools
import inspect
def f():
'''I am f'''
pass
g = functools.partial(f)
g.__doc__ = '''I am g'''
g.__name__ = 'g'
def partial(func, *args, **keywords):
def newfunc(*fargs, **fkeywords):
newkeywords = keywords.copy()
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:04 AM, BartC wrote:
>
>> I get a very strong impression
>> that you've never had to maintain appalingly written code. The overuse
>> of GOTO will certainly help in that area.
>
>
> (I've not defending its use, but there are good reasons for retaining it.
>
> Suppose you h
"Chris Angelico" a écrit dans le message de
news:mailman.13.1459955565.1197.python-l...@python.org...
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:18 AM, ast wrote:
"Mark Lawrence" a écrit dans le message de
news:mailman.131.1459949361.32530.python-l...@python.org...
On 06/04/2016 14:07, ast wrote:
Ru
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:06 pm, BartC wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 06:48, Gordon( Hotmail ) wrote:
>> The problem I am finding is most of the sites claiming to help understand
>> Python devote far too much space bragging about the wonders of Python
>> instead of...
I'd like to see these sites. I suspect
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 2:07 PM, ast wrote:
>
> I would like to know if it is advised or not to test
> a function's parameters before running it, e.g
> for functions stored on a public library ?
>
> def to_base(nber, base=16, use_af=True, sep=''):
> assert isinstance(nber, int) and nber >= 0
>
On 06/04/2016 15:20, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/04/2016 14:54, BartC wrote:
Please state why you're still here if Python is such a
poorly designed language that it doesn't fit your needs.
I was replying to the OP who was being put off the language. The vast
majority have to choose an off-th
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> type might also be a concern since it can be used to assemble
>> arbitrary classes.
>
> Sadly, this means denying the ability to interrogate an object for its
> type. And no, this won't do
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:07 pm, ast wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to know if it is advised or not to test
> a function's parameters before running it, e.g
> for functions stored on a public library ?
It depends. Sometimes it is best to do an explicit type check, sometimes it
is better to call a b
Thanks for your replies. I have a question in regard with my previous question.
I have a file that contains x,y,z and a value for that coordinate on each line.
Here I am giving an example of the file using a numpy array called f.
f=np.array([[1,1,1,1],
[1,1,2,2],
[1,1,3
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:47 AM, justin walters
wrote:
> I did some quick googling for you because I wasn't sure if Apache could run
> mod_php and mod_wsgi together. Apparently it can. See this google search:
> https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=can+apache+run+mod_php+and+mod_
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> type might also be a concern since it can be used to assemble
> arbitrary classes.
Sadly, this means denying the ability to interrogate an object for its
type. And no, this won't do:
def safe_type(obj): return type(obj)
because all you need is
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:57 AM, asimkon . wrote:
> I managed to connect Apache 2.2 with django framework successfully using
> Python 2.7 and mod_wsgi.so (Apache module) thanks to the instructions from
> https://pusonchen.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/build-django-website-with-apache-mod_wsgi-on-window
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I think Jon is on the right approach here for restricting evaluation of
> evaluation, which is a nicely constrained and small subset of Python. He's
> not allowing unrestricted arbitrary code execution: he has a very
> restricted (too restri
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:18 AM, ast wrote:
> "Mark Lawrence" a écrit dans le message de
> news:mailman.131.1459949361.32530.python-l...@python.org...
>>
>> On 06/04/2016 14:07, ast wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Please see
>> http://ftp.dev411.com/t/python/python-list/13bhcknhan/when-to-use-assert
>>
>
>
> Th
On 06/04/2016 15:34, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 10:25:13 AM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/04/2016 14:54, BartC wrote:
On 06/04/2016 12:46, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
BartC :
It'll cope with ordinary coding as well, although such programs seem
to be frowned upon here
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> BartC :
>
>> But you're right in that little is actually essential. Basic has shown
>> that.
>>
>> You need expressions, IF, GOTO, variables and assignments, and some
>> means of doing I/O.
>>
>> Pretty much every language has (had) those, a
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 10:25:13 AM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 14:54, BartC wrote:
> > On 06/04/2016 12:46, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> >> BartC :
> >
> >>> It'll cope with ordinary coding as well, although such programs seem
> >>> to be frowned upon here; they are not 'Pythonic
On 06/04/2016 14:54, BartC wrote:
On 06/04/2016 12:46, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
BartC :
It'll cope with ordinary coding as well, although such programs seem
to be frowned upon here; they are not 'Pythonic'.
I wonder what is left of Python after your list of exclusions.
There are plenty of fe
"Mark Lawrence" a écrit dans le message de
news:mailman.131.1459949361.32530.python-l...@python.org...
On 06/04/2016 14:07, ast wrote:
Please see
http://ftp.dev411.com/t/python/python-list/13bhcknhan/when-to-use-assert
Thanks for this paper
Running Python with the -O or -OO optimizat
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Seriously, Python wouldn't be, couldn't be Turing-complete without
> "while" (mainly because it doesn't support tail-recursion elimination).
Side point: Turing completeness actually assumes a mythical Turing
machine with infinite memory. So
Michael Selik :
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, 12:51 PM Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
>> Really, there's only one high-level construct you can't live without:
>> the "while" statement. Virtually every Python program has at least
>> one "while" statement, and in general, it is unavoidable.
>>
>> Basic programs,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:54 PM, BartC wrote:
> There are plenty of features that /I/ consider must-have, which Python
> doesn't have. It has to emulate them, unsatisfactorily, with variables or
> classes or functions, or do without.
Blub's Paradox epitomized.
> But you're right in that little i
BartC :
> But you're right in that little is actually essential. Basic has shown
> that.
>
> You need expressions, IF, GOTO, variables and assignments, and some
> means of doing I/O.
>
> Pretty much every language has (had) those, although it's fashionable
> now to do away with GOTO, and some are
On 06/04/2016 12:46, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
BartC :
It'll cope with ordinary coding as well, although such programs seem
to be frowned upon here; they are not 'Pythonic'.
I wonder what is left of Python after your list of exclusions.
There are plenty of features that /I/ consider must-have,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, 12:51 PM Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> BartC :
> Really, there's only one high-level construct you can't live without:
> the "while" statement. Virtually every Python program has at least one
> "while" statement, and in general, it is unavoidable.
>
> Basic programs, on the other h
>> Sorry to be late to the party--I applaud that you have already
>> crafted something to attack your problem. When you first posted,
>> there was a library that was tickling my memory, but I could not
>> remember its (simple) name. It occurred to me this morning, after
>> you posted your ne
On 06/04/2016 14:07, ast wrote:
Hello
I would like to know if it is advised or not to test
a function's parameters before running it, e.g
for functions stored on a public library ?
Example:
def to_base(nber, base=16, use_af=True, sep=''):
assert isinstance(nber, int) and nber >= 0
ass
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, ast wrote:
> def to_base(nber, base=16, use_af=True, sep=''):
>
>assert isinstance(nber, int) and nber >= 0
>assert isinstance(base, int) and base >= 2
>assert isinstance(use_af, bool)
>assert isinstance(sep, str) and len(sep) == 1
>
> tbc
>
> Wit
On 06/04/2016 12:38, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 7:06:28 AM UTC-4, BartC wrote:
On 05/04/2016 06:48, Gordon( Hotmail ) wrote:
The problem I am finding is most of the sites claiming to help understand
Python devote
far too much space bragging about the wonders of Python
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016, at 21:43, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> As Zooko says, Guido's "best argument is that reducing usability (in
> terms
> of forbidding language features, especially module import) and reducing
> the
> usefulness of extant library code" would make the resulting interpreter
> too
> feeb
Hello
I would like to know if it is advised or not to test
a function's parameters before running it, e.g
for functions stored on a public library ?
Example:
def to_base(nber, base=16, use_af=True, sep=''):
assert isinstance(nber, int) and nber >= 0
assert isinstance(base, int) and base
On 06/04/2016 12:06, BartC wrote:
On 05/04/2016 06:48, Gordon( Hotmail ) wrote:
I am struggling to understand the basic principles of Python having
spent many years as a pure Amateur tinkering with a variety of BASIC
Last time I looked, there seemed to be around 250 dialects of Basic, and
with
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016, at 17:37, Nagy László Zsolt wrote:
>
> >> It is blurred by design. There is an interpretation where an interval
> >> between [0..4] equals to a set of intervals ([0..2],[2..4]).
> > No, because 2.5 is in one and not the other.
> My notation was: 0..4 for any number between 0
BartC :
> But you don't have to use classes, exceptions, decorators, generators,
> iterators, closures, comprehensions, meta classes, ... the list of
> meaningless buzzwords just goes on.
Also, you don't have to use the letter "e" in your identifiers or the
number 2 anywhere in your programs.
Re
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 7:06:28 AM UTC-4, BartC wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 06:48, Gordon( Hotmail ) wrote:
> > The problem I am finding is most of the sites claiming to help understand
> > Python devote
> > far too much space bragging about the wonders of Python instead of...
>
> I fully agree
On 05/04/2016 06:48, Gordon( Hotmail ) wrote:
I am struggling to understand the basic principles of Python having
spent many years as a pure Amateur tinkering with a variety of BASIC
Last time I looked, there seemed to be around 250 dialects of Basic, and
with wildly differing implementations
I managed to connect Apache 2.2 with django framework successfully using
Python 2.7 and mod_wsgi.so (Apache module) thanks to the instructions from
https://pusonchen.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/build-django-website-with-apache-mod_wsgi-on-windows/.
The problem is that i see the Django project Web page
Gregory Ewing :
> Another option for graphical stuff is pygame:
Thanks!
> http://pygame.org/news.html
Especially for this:
No need to mess with installing it outside of your operating systems
package manager.
However:
Does Pygame work with Python 3?
Yes. Pygame 1.9.2 supports Py
Hi,
Question on how people here would design a basic plugin architecture:
I'm playing with the idea of having a pluggable system where the users can
create some simple classes which can then be accessed in a Django app.
I want to make it as __simple__ as possible for the user. Hopefully to the
p
Another option for graphical stuff is pygame:
http://pygame.org/news.html
A rough translation of some of your code:
import pygame, sys
from pygame import display, draw, event, font, Color, QUIT
# Set up the display window
screen = display.set_mode((800, 600))
colors = ["red", "orange", "yello
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016, 10:46 PM Nagy László Zsolt
wrote:
>
> >> How about creating two classes for this? One that supports zero sized
> >> intervals, and another that doesn't?
> > If you don't want zero sized intervals, just don't put any in it. You
> > don't have a separate list type to support ev
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, 2:51 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 05:56 am, Michael Selik wrote:
>
> [Sven R. Kunze]
> >> If you work like in the 80's, maybe. Instead of scrolling, (un)setting
> >> jumppoints, or use splitview of the same file, it's just faster/easier
> to
> >> jump betwee
99 matches
Mail list logo
