On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Michael Selik <michael.se...@gmail.com> wrote: > However, you might want to protect them from a subtle infinite loop or other > traps that are tough to recover from. If it's an obvious infinity, well, > that's their own fault. For example, ``range`` stops you from a zero > step-size, but won't stop you from ``range(int(1e200))``. >
>>> range(int(1e200)) range(0, 99999999999999996973312221251036165947450327545502362648241750950346848435554075534196338404706251868027512415973882408182135734368278484639385041047239877871023591066789981811181813306167128854888448) Looks fine to me :) ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
