[Python-buildbots] Re: Offer: AMD64 Debian Root Free-Threading buildbot

On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:03 PM Chris Angelico wrote: > With no-GIL builds becoming more important, is there need of a second > AMD64 Debian root buildbot to cover this configuration? I'm happy to > host a second bot VM on the same system as the existing > angelico-debian-amd64 builder. It can be

[Python-buildbots] Re: Setting up new buildbot workers

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 9:33 AM Itamar O wrote: > Hello! > > As described in the docs > , I'm reaching > out to this mailing list to discuss adding new buildbot workers and obtain > the needed credentials. That page could do with an update

[Python-buildbots] Re: Adding Emscripten/NodeJS buildbot

Hi Ethan, On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 8:35 AM Ethan Smith wrote: > I'm reposting this because it seems to have been eaten by the moderation > filter because I subscribed incorrectly and Mailman thought I wasn't a > member of the list (sorry mailing list admins!). It's a low-volume list with "guilty

[Python-buildbots] Re: ARM64 Windows buildbot worker not running

On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:38 AM Niyas Sait wrote: > Hello, > > It hasn't been sorted yet. Could I get some help to resolve this, please? Sorry for the delay. I've restarted the buildbot master service, and your worker seems to be building now. ___ Pytho

[Python-buildbots] Re: Fwd: [Python-Dev] Windows buildbots may be broken

I opted to clear out the checkouts to let buildbot recreate them. I'll try to keep an eye on that worker today. On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:12 AM Victor Stinner wrote: > > The owner of AMD64 Windows8.1 Non-Debug is Zachary Ware > . > > Victor > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021

[Python-buildbots] Re: Is the bot master down?

On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 10:42 AM Michael Felt wrote: > As I have been re-working my servers I am not sure if the lack of > contact I have with the bot server is self-inflected, or is it down? We ran out of disk again; working on it. ___ Python-Buildbots

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbots and 2.7

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:24 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > > One of my Z systems recently ran out of disk space. It appears that > builders for 3.9 were added, builders for 2.7 were decommissioned, but > the 2.7 directories were not removed. > > Are 2.7 directories suppose to be removed automaticall

[Python-buildbots] Re: Please remove my "einat-ubuntu" builder

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:19 AM Tal Einat wrote: > Hi, > > Despite my efforts, I'm forced to the conclusion that I won't be able to > continue to keep my buildbot worker "einat-ubuntu" running. > > Please remove it from the fleet. Sorry to see it go, but thanks for running it while it lasted! It

[Python-buildbots] Re: kloth-win64 Buildslave Downtime

Thanks for the heads up! On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 5:35 PM Jeremy Kloth wrote: > > I'm in the process of moving, so my buildslave is going to be down for > at least 1 week (maybe a little longer). > > Sorry for any inconvenience that this may bring. > > Thanks > > -- > Jeremy Kloth > __

[Python-buildbots] Re: Adding a gps-raspbian bot

Merged and deployed. The new worker will connect with the same password as your clang-ubsan worker (which is the default for you), or if you'd prefer a new password I can generate one for you. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 3:41 PM Gregory P. Smith wrote: > > ping. :) > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:24

[Python-buildbots] Re: No notification mails for AIX bots - why?

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 2:25 PM m...@vazor.com wrote: > I used salt at a startup to manage infra - are the configs checked in > somewhere? Buildbot config is at https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config and Salt config is at https://github.com/python/psf-salt _

[Python-buildbots] Re: No notification mails for AIX bots - why?

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:38 AM Nick Coghlan wrote: > Does the buildbot master need to be a physical machine? Or should we > be talking to the PSF about potentially moving it onto their cloud > hosting infrastructure? As I understand it, it's already a (small) VM at OSUOSL; the only real require

[Python-buildbots] Re: Python buildbot master problem?

At a guess: we ran out of disk again and reconnections didn't happen as fast as the master wanted once it was restarted. I wasn't the one to catch it this time and all of the old logs were deleted (presumably to clear up substantial disk space), so I am just guessing :) On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbot master hung?

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 8:44 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > Everything seems to be back to normal now. I had hoped that someone > would have investigated the report at the time. Unfortunately, your report came in at a time when I was unable to immediately look into it, and then I forgot about it :(.

[Python-buildbots] Re: s390x Rawhide won't connect

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:05 AM David Edelsohn wrote: > Any suggestions? Looks like it's connected and building, as far as I can tell: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/323/builds/93 I looked at the master log, the only oddity I can see is that apparently there were multiple simultaneo

[Python-buildbots] Re: A RHEL8 s390x machine ready to join the fleet

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:40 AM Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The team behind IBM's LinuxONE Community Cloud have provided me with an s390x > RHEL8 machine for joining the ranks of CPython's buildbot fleet. > > Suggested name: cstratak-RHEL8-s390x Hi Charalampos, and thank

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbot Master update?

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:06 AM Jeremy Kloth wrote: > It may be worth sending out a notification to python-dev about this > change. Anyone who watches the buildbots regularly may be in for a > bit of a shock when they do not see any status for recent builds. Or, > like me, who have a particular

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbot Master update?

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 10:38 AM Jeremy Kloth wrote: > It seems that the buildbot master has been updated and lost all the > previous build information. > > Also, the workers have been renumbered so previous links (e.g., in the > BPO reports) are now broken. This was intentional; the existing dat

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbot build prefixes changed

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:40 AM David Edelsohn wrote: > > Is this only an issue for systems with Clang installed? I don't see > that range of names on any of my workers. If you don't mind the bandwidth to check things out fresh again and don't want to try to track down which ones are still neces

Re: [Python-buildbots] Finally ! Many thanks!

On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 7:22 AM Michael wrote: > Finally, got to this point that the tests are all passing on the bot - 3.X!! Congrats! > p.s. - now that 3.8 is beta - Will there be a separate bot for 3.8 in > the near future? We do now have 3.8 builders, but those workers that were restricted

Re: [Python-buildbots] buildtimes, success-rate

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:11 AM Michael Felt wrote: > Hi. > > Is there something missing from the AIX buildbots that there is no > record for the buildtime? I'm not sure what you mean. Looking at https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/161 I see durations for every build (and a sudden jump fr

Re: [Python-buildbots] Random failure when deploying the new buildbot config

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:52 AM Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > I just deployed the new config for > https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/pull/88 but I got an > assertion error which gone away when I re-run "buildbot reconfig > master". Should I worry or not? I'm not too worried about it,

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows ARM32 buildbots

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:43 AM Paul Monson via Python-Buildbots wrote: > Hi, Hi Paul, > I am preparing to set up Windows ARM32 buildbots. > The doc page at https://devguide.python.org/buildworker/ > says to send email to this alias to discuss adding a worker and to get a > workername and pass

Re: [Python-buildbots] Adding a Fedora Rawhide x86_64 to the buildbot fleet

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:55 AM Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > Hello everyone, Hi, and sorry this has taken so long for me to respond! > We've recently got a Fedora Rawhide virtual machine which should be available > and up at all times and I'd like to add it to the existing fleet of buildbots.

Re: [Python-buildbots] The process of adding my buildbot worker to the buildbot fleet

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:48 PM Xin, Peixing wrote: > Is public network IP required for the buildbot worker? Currently I am putting > it inside my company's local network. Do I need to move it outside to expose > it on the Internet directly? No public address necessary; all connections are init

Re: [Python-buildbots] Any advice for the good "size" of a Python buildbot worker?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:06 AM Victor Stinner wrote: > We would like to add more buildbot workers for test Python on Fedora > and RHEL, but I have no idea of the ideal "size" of a worker: It basically comes down to how long you want to wait for results :). The devguide lists [1] 2 cpu, 512 MB RA

Re: [Python-buildbots] The process of adding my buildbot worker to the buildbot fleet

Hi Peixing, On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 7:23 AM Xin, Peixing wrote: > I want to add a new platform support for cpython, that is VxWorks RTOS. A > builtbot worker has been internally setup ready to join the fleet. But any > process or guidance I need to follow? Where is the master.cfg located? And

Re: [Python-buildbots] [Python-Buildbots] - some/many bots stuck acquiring locks

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 12:48 PM David Bolen wrote: > If you look back on the worker there's probably some other build on the > same worker still technically running that's blocking the rest. It might > be old enough to not show on the main summary page, and you won't see if it > just looking at

[Python-buildbots] ware-gentoo-x86 down until further notice

Hi all, My x86 Gentoo buildbot worker is down until further notice due to a dead power supply fan. Given the age of this machine, I'm not sure that it's even worthwhile to replace the power supply, though I do plan to bring the worker back in some form as resources allow. Unfortunately, this wor

Re: [Python-buildbots] Any interest for buildbot on AIX with xlc as compiler (rather than gcc)?

Hi Michael, On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 2:44 AM Michael Felt wrote: > > Now that I am on the mailing list - lets start again. (Note: the wiki > only says send an email, not join a mailing list (first)). Sorry, your first mail did make it through, but I haven't had a chance to properly respond yet.

Re: [Python-buildbots] Any interest in an Intel Ubuntu buildbot?

g! >> >> Thanks for the help Zachary! >> >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Tal Einat wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Tal Einat wrote: >>> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Zachary Ware >>> >> I don't think we

Re: [Python-buildbots] Any interest in an Intel Ubuntu buildbot?

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:53 AM Victor Stinner wrote: > 2018-07-02 15:25 GMT+02:00 Zachary Ware : > > if we find ourselves in the same situation > > that Gentoo did this week, your builder will be running untrusted code > > and causing who knows what kind of mayhem. > >

Re: [Python-buildbots] Any interest in an Intel Ubuntu buildbot?

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:07 AM Tal Einat wrote: > > My home file-server is an Intel NUC with a Celeron CPU running Ubuntu > 16.04. It compiles and runs Python just fine. It is always on (>99% uptime). > > Would you like me to set it up as another buildbot in our fleet? I don't think we can have t

Re: [Python-buildbots] Filtering build triggers

On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Kloth wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 8:48 AM Zachary Ware > wrote: >> This should already be implemented. See here: >> https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/blob/56aa6ddc4333cb0829eb90847a4c89c90a5d4db4/master/master.cfg#L524-

Re: [Python-buildbots] Filtering build triggers

On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Jeremy Kloth wrote: > Would it be possible to add a filter to the build trigger that would > skip documentation only changes like the configuration for AppVeyor? > (see .github/appveyor.yml) To my knowledge, we don't have any tests > dependent on the contents of do

Re: [Python-buildbots] bolen-ubuntu worker updated to 18.04

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Berker Peksağ wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:52 AM, Ned Deily wrote: >> Excellent news, David! Thank you so for much for your generous buildbot >> support over many years! It is much appreciated. > > +1, thank you David! Agreed! Also, I've now updated th

[Python-buildbots] Potential master downtime

Hi all, As part of the scheduled maintenance at OSUOSL on the 21st [1] the buildbot master may be down long enough that your workers start to get worried, but I'll be keeping an eye on it to try to keep downtime to a minimum. There shouldn't be any action required on the part of worker owners; I'

Re: [Python-buildbots] Outage notifications aren't happening?

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > I just noticed by chance that my build slave was down. Not sure how > long it had been down for, but it would have been several days, maybe > a week or more. There used to be automated emails whenever contact was > lost; did those disappear

Re: [Python-buildbots] 3.6 and 2.7 buildbots not active

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: >> I've restarted the master, we'll see if that makes any difference. > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid still only gives "master" as > choice for the branch. > > Moreover, I don't see 2.7 nor 3.6 workers on this page. > > http://buildb

Re: [Python-buildbots] 3.6 and 2.7 buildbots not active

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hum, it seems like a configuration issue, since 2.7 and 3.6 *are* tested. > > Example of recent builds on 2.7: > http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/101 > > Victor > > 2017-11-08 17:22 GMT+01:00 Xavier de Gaye : >> I don't see any 3.6

Re: [Python-buildbots] Outdated wiki information

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > This page: > https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/ > > should probably be changed to from "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker" > > These two wiki pages related to buildbots have really > oudated information: > > https://wiki.python.org/moin

Re: [Python-buildbots] Looking up status of build bots?

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Victor Stinner > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Zachary Ware migrated the buildbot server to 0.9 last weekend. It >> changes a *lot* of things. It will need a few days (or weeks?) to >&

[Python-buildbots] Upgrading buildbot master

Just a heads-up, I'm going to try to get the build master upgraded tonight. If things aren't running at something approximating normal by 00:00 CDT, I'll be reverting back to the current setup. -- Zach ___ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots

Re: [Python-buildbots] Buildbot 9 + Postgres backend

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > I'd like to suggest that when we upgrade the buildbot master, > we use a Postgres backend instead of sqlite: > > http://docs.buildbot.net/latest/manual/cfg-global.html#postgres Since it's such a simple change, we can just factor `db_uri` ou

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

Hi Craig, Sorry I've been largely unresponsive; time has been hard to come by lately. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > I'm happy to help look into any problems, but you'll have to tell me what > those > problems are for me to investigate. For starters, there is still a

Re: [Python-buildbots] Linux buildbots with the vm_socket.h kernel header?

On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Matt Billenstein wrote: > I have an Ubuntu 16.04 box I could run a builder on. Sorry it's taken this long for me to get back to this. If you're still interested in running that bot, send me a private mail and I'll get you set up. -- Zach ___

[Python-buildbots] OpenSSL versions on builders

Hi folks, Since OpenSSL 1.0.1 was EOL'd at the end of 2016, we're looking into whether we can drop support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and earlier in Python 3.7. However, it looks like many of our builders are still using as far back as 1.0.1e. If you would, please check to make sure your builders are usi

Re: [Python-buildbots] Email notifications on buildbot failures

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Gregory P. Smith wrote: >> Please do not send automated buildbot state transition mail to _this_ >> list. Leave this low traffic list to communication from humans about >> buildbots and infrastructure (the

Re: [Python-buildbots] Adding osx buildbot

Hi Matt, On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Matt Billenstein wrote: > I have a couple machines with newer releases of OS-X I could setup as > buildbots. I've already pip installed buildbot, hg, git, xcode, etc on one of > them -- what next? First, send me a couple more details about the machines,

[Python-buildbots] Reminder: Github migration tomorrow

Just a reminder that we'll be migrating cpython to Github tomorrow. If not already done, please be sure to install Git on your workers as soon as possible. Thanks! -- Zach ___ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https://mail.python

Re: [Python-buildbots] buildbots not processing the pending requests

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Xavier de Gaye wrote: > Just to inform you that the buildbots seem to have mostly stopped > processing the pending building requests since yesterday. Thanks for the heads up, Xavier. This seems to coincide with the OpenIndiana bots both hanging during tests, but

Re: [Python-buildbots] Git installation and roll call

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote: > Yes, git is available in the openbsd -current i386 buildbot Thanks Francisco! It appears that that bot hasn't connected in quite some time, though; is there something wrong that I can help with? -- Zach

Re: [Python-buildbots] Git installation and roll call

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Jesus Cea wrote: > On 08/12/16 05:20, Zachary Ware wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It has come to my attention that one of our members has been trying to >> send mail to the list and it has been silently disappearing. To >> determine w

Re: [Python-buildbots] Git installation and roll call

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > Hi, > > I previously tried to tell to this list that the machines hosting the > bruynooghe-* buildslaves are now permanently powered down and I no longer > work at the company which used to own/host them. So probably nest to remove > them

[Python-buildbots] Git installation and roll call

Hi all, It has come to my attention that one of our members has been trying to send mail to the list and it has been silently disappearing. To determine whether this is a widespread issue, please reply-all to this message, sending to both the list and me. I'll compare replies I receive to the ar

Re: [Python-buildbots] Buildbot: buildslave angelico-debian-amd64 was lost

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:01 AM, wrote: >> The Buildbot working for 'Python' >> has noticed that the buildslave named angelico-debian-amd64 went away >> >> It last disconnected at Thu Dec 1 15:01:21 2016 (buildmaster-local time) >> >> The

Re: [Python-buildbots] Preparing for the GitHub migration

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Zachary Ware wrote: > We're a bit past due for an update [of the master], so I'm going to try > to find time this weekend to both upgrade our master and try out > GitHub integration. Changing the source for the builders will be > sim

Re: [Python-buildbots] Preparing for the GitHub migration

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:35 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > Note that GDB tried to upgrade to the latest builtbot and it was a > spectacular disaster. The new master is much more complicated and > computationally-expensive in an effort to provide a more beautiful UI. > Without a much more powerful

Re: [Python-buildbots] Preparing for the GitHub migration

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:21 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 23:52:34 +, "Gregory P. Smith" > wrote: >> I *believe* where and how the buildbots pull code from is controlled >> entirely by the buildbot master/server based on what I see my my own build >> slave's log. So swi

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows 2.7 Builders

Hi David, On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:38 PM, David Bolen wrote: > Interesting - I probably would have assumed removing 2010 was safe for > 2.7 as well. However, all of my 2.7 builders (XP/7/8/10) currently > have both 2008 and 2010 so any dependency on 2010 would go unnoticed. > > Assuming the 2010

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows 2.7 Builders

Hi Jeremy, On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Jeremy Kloth wrote: > Hello, > > I was recently cleaning up my buildbot, clearing space, removing > unused software, ..., and decided to remove MSVC 2010 as no supported > Python uses that compiler. Well, to my surprise, actually I forgot, > you do need

Re: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the stable list

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware > wrote: >> I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set, >> but that hasn't actually happened yet. There was no disagreement with >> addin

Re: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the stable list

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Xavier de Gaye wrote: > Maybe the problems in issue 23968 [1] could have been detected earlier > if the Gentoo "installed Python" buildbots setup by Zachary had been > on the stable list. I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set, but tha

Re: [Python-buildbots] Understanding of buildbot master

Hi Praveen, On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Praveen Ramanujam wrote: > I am trying to understand the buildbot architecture. > > I have a remote slave that is connected to the master running in AWS. > I have not given any information about the slave to the master. > > > How does the master call th

Re: [Python-buildbots] hg.python.org cert changed, update fingerprint

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:50 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > I have updated the fingerprint in .hgrc. I'm not sure the change stuck, see http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/PPC64LE%20Fedora%202.7/builds/433 -- Zach ___ Python-Buildbots mailing list P

Re: [Python-buildbots] Iam completely new

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:23 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > https://docs.python.org/devguide/buildslave.html > > is more up to date, I think. If there is something useful on the wiki page > that is not on the devguide page, we should fix that. Ah yes, I'd somehow completely forgotten that page exi

Re: [Python-buildbots] Iam completely new

Hi, On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Palanikumar Gopalakrishnan wrote: > Hi , > Iam completely new to bots and python, where i start my bot > creation Have a look here: https://wiki.python.org/moin/BuildBot If there's something not covered there or you have specific questions that tha

[Python-buildbots] Tag-based buildmaster (was: Most 3.x buildbots are green again ... )

(Cross-posting to python-buildbots, discussion is probably best continued there) On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 13:17 Zachary Ware > wrote: >> After receiving a suggestion from koobs several months ago, I've been >> interm

Re: [Python-buildbots] [python-committers] New installed Python builders

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:11 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:11:15 +0200, Serhiy Storchaka > wrote: >> On 23.11.15 18:00, R. David Murray wrote: >> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:58:01 -0600, Zachary Ware >> > wrote: >> > I haven't

[Python-buildbots] New installed Python builders

Hi, Inspired by a couple of issues about testing installed Python that popped up this morning (#25694 and #25696), I've set up a new set of builders[1] to build, install, and test the installed Python. They run on the same slave that runs my "x86 Gentoo Non-Debug with X" builders. If you are int

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:56 PM, David Bolen wrote: > Just an FYI related to these: > >> "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are >> platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be >> marked unstable): >> bolen-ubuntu >> bolen-windows >> bolen-windows8 >

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote: > I do think we > want to resolve the bolen issues and not just move them to unstable, > though. I agree with that. > It looks like jcea brought the OpenIndiana buildbot back on-line, > but it seems to have gotten into trouble processing t

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware wrote: > I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new > stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I > can find some time to get anywhere on that this week. Here's the breakdo

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:11 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders? > > The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green). > There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the > stable builders list. I had inten

Re: [Python-buildbots] SkyLake Intel Buildbot

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:23 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 07:54:01 +, "Papa, Florin" > wrote: >> The values for the requested fields are: >> Owner:Intel >> OS: Ubuntu 15.10 64-bit >> Architecture: Intel Core i7-6700K aka Skylake >

Re: [Python-buildbots] SkyLake Intel Buildbot

Hi Florin, On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Papa, Florin wrote: > Hi all, > > This is Florin Papa from the Intel Corporation. I would like to set up a > Python buildbot on a SkyLake computer in order to have hardware support for > the MPX feature proposed here: http://bugs.python.org/issue25300.

Re: [Python-buildbots] Buildslave cleanup

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > Thanks for the heads up, I was rather busy when you created this list > and first pinged, and then lost sight of it. The buildslave seemed to > stop running for no particular reason and needed manual restarting > every so often, which cle

Re: [Python-buildbots] Buildslave cleanup

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Trent Nelson wrote: > Snakebite's not been doing well recently :-( The main > gateway/firewall/router/everything server appeared to go down early last > week, so, all the SB buildbots will be unavailable for a while. Yep, unfortunately most of the slaves I just

[Python-buildbots] Buildslave cleanup

I've just gone through and removed buildslaves that have been offline for a long time. The only currently-offline buildslaves remaining are bruynooghe-solaris-csw and cea-indiana-amd64. Floris and Jesús, could you give me an update on the status of your slaves, please? I'm planning to reshuffle

[Python-buildbots] New buildbots active

Hi folks, Just wanted to let you know in case you hadn't seen them that there are a couple of new buildbots in service: one that builds on Windows in Release configuration [1] and one that builds the documentation and runs a couple of style checks on it [2]. Both are currently in the 'unstable' s

Re: [Python-buildbots] OpenBSD snapshot (5.8-beta) buildslave is back

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote: > Hey guys, short announcement. > > After upgrading that box to the latest OpenBSD i386 snapshot, mercurial clones > of the cpython repo work again (my guess, it was failing because of something > in the libressl libs in OpenBSD