On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:21 PM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 23:52:34 +0000, "Gregory P. Smith" <g...@krypto.org> > wrote: >> I *believe* where and how the buildbots pull code from is controlled >> entirely by the buildbot master/server based on what I see my my own build >> slave's log. So switching is likely easy from that standpoint. > > Correct, the slave polls the master for jobs, but the master tells > the slave exactly what to do. So either Zach or I need to rewrite > the master.cfg on the buildbot master to use git instead of hg.
Yep. I think buildbot has something specifically for tying into GitHub, but I'm not sure if our master is new enough to have it. We're a bit past due for an update there anyway, so I'm going to try to find time this weekend to both upgrade our master and try out GitHub integration. Changing the source for the builders will be simple once the master is looking at GitHub instead of hg.python.org. As a side note here, how interested are we in upgrading to buildbot 0.9.x? (See https://nine.buildbot.net/ for an example testing itself.) That upgrade will be a much larger project than the GitHub switch, but I've been wanting to rewrite the master anyway, and that would be a good opportunity to do the 0.9 upgrade. > However, I don't actually remember how the master finds out about > changes, so I'd have to look that up. Maybe Zach remembers. We have a hook on hg.python.org that pings the build master when changes are pushed. I'm not sure exactly how GitHub integration will work, but since buildbot itself is on GitHub I'm sure it's well-supported. -- Zach _______________________________________________ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
