Julien C. wrote:
Answering to myself: no 2.6.14 doesn't send reports.
Is this only an issue with integrating with dashboard or are you not
getting reports at all with 2.6.14? I'm using the EPEL packages and
my reports are working AFAICT.
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: w
Julien C. wrote:
The dashboard integration part.
I ended up using yup.puppetlabs.com and it works fine :-)
Good to know. I wonder if the dashboard packages should require
puppet >= 2.7.x ?
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
Gary Larizza wrote:
Have you checked out the packages that Karanbir Singh has created? They
work fairly well --> http://centos.karan.org/el5/ruby187/
They're also not updated for recent security vulnerabilities, which
should be a concern for anyone deploying them in production.
Basically, t
Michael Stahnke wrote:
For the next major Puppet version, code-named Telly, we have some
changes coming. This is the first in a series of emails around these
changes and may require some input from the community.
For Telly, the nagios types will be moved into a module. This allows
them to b
ble linguistic crutch of the inarticulate
motherfucker.
-- Bruce Sherrod
#!/usr/bin/python -tt
#
# Copyright 2012 Todd Zullinger
#
# Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and its
# documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that
# the a
Michael Stahnke wrote:
> This release is a maintenance release of the 2.6.x series of Puppet.
>
> This release is available for download at:
> http://puppetlabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet-2.6.9rc1.tar.gz
Better late than never, I've pushed rpm's for this release to my
fedorapeople.org repo:
Hi,
Christopher McCrory wrote:
> I don't know if this is a rpm buglet or a general puppet buglet, but
> with puppet-2.6.9-0.1.rc1.el5.noarch.rpm from tmz I get emails like:
>
> Wed Jun 22 12:46:11 -0700 2011 Puppet (notice): Finished catalog run in
> 6.53 seconds
>
> on every run. I haven't teste
Michael Stahnke wrote:
> This release is a maintenance release of the 2.6.x series of Puppet.
> This will likely be the last release in the 2.6.x series for Puppet,
> now that 2.7 is out.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/pu
Hi Derek,
Derek J. Balling wrote:
> Do you have an ETA for 2.7.x RPMs in that repo by any chance?
I'd like to get 2.6.6 into EPEL and then update it to 2.6.9 before I
move my fedorapeople repo to 2.7.x. I've not looked closely at 2.7.x
yet, but I get the feeling that it's not going to be an upda
rvlinden wrote:
> I used to download the Puppet and Facter RHEL5 rpm packages from
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~tmz/repo/puppet/epel/
>
> but the latest version on that site is puppet 2.6.9 and facter
> 1.5.9.
>
> Does anyone know if this site is the still maintained ? or if there
> are other
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can get the latest puppet, 2.7.1 as RPM's?
>
> The spec file that comes with the puppet 2.7.1 source is broken
> again, and only version 0.25.5 seems to be available via EPEL, which
> means that the website's assertion that you can get puppet as an
treydock wrote:
> Here's a diff for version 2.6.9...all you have to do is change the
> Version number. I added ruby-shadow cause I have had problems in 5.6
> with the "dist" variable not being set.
If you're building packages and not using mock (which you should
definitely check out, if you aren'
Chris May wrote:
> Did anyone ever post a bug, or find a solution for this? I've just
> upgraded some of our Solaris boxes (using OpenCSW) to 2.6.9 and I'm
> seeing the same behaviour.
If there is a bug filed, I'd love to know what it is. Searching
redmine for "reports" doesn't find anything that
Hi all,
I find myself in (generally) sunny Sarasota Florida for a few weeks.
Any folks in the area want to meet up for drinks and puppet chatter?
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
Subtl
I wrote:
> Chris May wrote:
>> Did anyone ever post a bug, or find a solution for this? I've just
>> upgraded some of our Solaris boxes (using OpenCSW) to 2.6.9 and I'm
>> seeing the same behaviour.
>
> If there is a bug filed, I'd love to know what it is. Searching
> redmine for "reports" doesn't
Jim N wrote:
> I was getting this when starting puppetmasterd (puppet-
> server-0.25.5-1.el6.noarch RPM install):
>
> $ sudo /etc/init.d/puppetmaster start
> Starting puppetmaster: Could not run: Could not create PID file: /var/
> lib/puppet/run/puppetmasterd.pid
>
>
> This change in the init scrip
Stefan Schulte wrote:
> I guess facter as a standalone executable doesn't look into
> /var/lib/puppet. Try running
>
> FACTERLIB=/var/lib/puppet/lib/facter facter
>
> as described in the custom facts guide [1]
>
> [1] http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/custom_facts.html#an-example
Or use the -p
Sam Roza wrote:
> I think that the issue is due to my puppet installation (from EPEL)
> not configuring the init.d script properly.
It's configured fine as it is. :)
> puppetmasterd doesn't think it is a service.
You want to use service { 'puppetmaster': ... } in your manifests.
--
Todd
Johan Sunnerstig wrote:
> That sounds promising. I'm currently using the EPEL repository to
> install Puppet, and they're at 1.6.0.
> I guess I'll have to decide what's less trouble, installing Puppet
> some other way or rewriting a bunch of manifests. :)
1.6.1 is in epel-testing. Once it moves t
Steve Traylen wrote:
> The recently released facter contains a new fact $osfamily
>
> Facter 1.6.2. available
>
> ##New fact: (6792) Added osfamily fact.
>
>Added osfamily fact to determine if a given operating system is a
>derivative of a common operating system.
>
> this is equal to redh
robert.morti...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am having no joy installing Puppet Server with MySQL support from
> the EPEL on Centos 6. The active record support for MySQL seems to be
> missing. Has anyone seen a good howto for this?
Sadly, rubygem-rails is not built for EL-6. You can either rebuild
the 2
Jo Rhett wrote:
> Are you running the latest centos or redhat-based kernel? If so,
> 274.7.1 is corked. Backgrade from 274.7.1 to 274.3.1 and the problem
> will disappear. This is documented in
>
> https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/10418
>
> And RedHat bug
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
James Cammarata wrote:
> Any idea if/when these will be available in EPEL?
Bundled rails and various gems will make that difficult,
unfortunately. I don't know all that much about rails and gems, but
if anyone knows if it's possible to cleanly install multiple versions
of rails and gems, I'd be c
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote:
> Brice Figureau writes:
>
>> Can you try with a newer rails/active record? This one is a little
>> bit old, and I'm not sure there aren't some bugs. I vaguely
>> remember that puppet required rails 2.2, but I might be wrong.
Well, puppet 0.25 doesn't refuse to run w
James Turnbull wrote:
> Welcome back to the Puppet release cycle for the second outing of
> 0.25.5 - release candidate number 2.
For thoae using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL-4, EL-5 and Fedora 11 - 13 are avai
I wrote:
> For thoae using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
>
> http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
>
> Packages for EL-4, EL-5 and Fedora 11 - 13 are available for testing.
> Add the puppet.repo file from either the epel or fedora directories to
> /etc/yum.repos.d to
Marley Bacelar wrote:
> I am trying to do my first puppet configuration, already installed the
> puppetserver and client, in this link show my configuration and my puppet
> structure:
>
> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/212227/
Which reads, in part:
> # ls /etc/puppet/ #
> files fileserver.conf man
James Turnbull wrote:
> The release candidate is available at:
>
> http://puppetlabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet-0.25.5rc3.tar.gz
For thoae using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 11 - 13 are availa
Peter Berghold wrote:
> Has anybody out there written a custom check for Nagios to determine
> if puppetd and/or puppetmasterd is running? I am considering writing
> one if not.
FWIW, I've got an overengineered check_puppet and puppetstatus tool
at: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/scripts/puppetstatus
Matt Wallace wrote:
> I've updated my manifests to reflect the above, however now when I run
> Yum manually on the servers I get the following output:
>
> Repository 'epel' is missing name in configuration, using id
>
>
> It doesn't make a difference to the install, I'm just wondering if I'm
> miss
Oded wrote:
> Never tried it myself but I think you can create the certificate as
> a part of the provisioning process, and then somehow place it in the
> new server.
> http://serverfault.com/questions/19462/how-can-i-pre-sign-puppet-certificates
Without reading the link to see if it's similar to
Forrie wrote:
> Is there a way to just install the client component of the Puppet gem,
> install of both on systems that don't need the server/master
> component.
I don't think so. But all decent puppet packages have this
separation. I'd highly recommend not using gems. :)
--
ToddOpenP
Gus F. wrote:
> I am using puppet (version 0.25.5-1.e15 for redhat) for password
> management for non-system users. This morning, users on some of my
> puppet clients had their encrypted password strings in /etc/shadow
> replaced with the following string:
>
> YAML::syck::BadAlias
Eeeww. That's
Forrie wrote:
> What is the disadvantage of using the puppet gem vs. installing from
> source (install.rb)?
Well, I wouldn't recommend that either. I much prefer a proper
packaging system like dpkg or rpm. But that's just my opinion. :)
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.po
Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> Anyone written a check for nagios to make sure their nodes are
> checking in and updating correctly? I think I'd rather have a
> passive check on the nagios server that just alerts me if something
> hasn't checked in for last 24 hours rather than having antoher
> dashboa
James Turnbull wrote:
> Welcome back again to the Puppet release cycle with the long-awaited
> eleventy times better RC2 release.
>
> The 2.6.0 release is a major feature release and includes a huge
> variety of new features, fixes, updates and enhancements. These
> include the complete cut-over f
James Turnbull wrote:
> Welcome back again to the Puppet release cycle with the just out of
> the gate release candidate 3.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12 - 13 are available fo
James Turnbull wrote:
> Welcome back again to the Puppet release cycle with really truly
> next to final release candidate 4.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12 - 13 are available
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I just grabbed puppet 2.6, and I'm wondering if there's a way to
> install it to an alternative root location. The docs at
> http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/installation.html talk about how to
> set an alternate binary path etc, but nothing about specifying an
> alternat
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> After going through some dependency hell trying to get the
> rpmforge-release package installed before the RPMforge repo, which
> contains the GPG key for RPMforge packages, now I find that when
> puppet tries to install this package, this happens:
>
> Jul 20 10:20:04 slog
CraftyTech wrote:
> Gotcha... and I may also not mind creating multiple files under the
> repo directory, but how do I disable the default repos that come
> with CentOS?
yumrepo { 'base': enabled => 0 }
You can use 'enabled => absent' to remove the repo definition from the
file entirely.
--
Tod
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> The spec file for for (whatever version this actually is), doesn't
> cleanly build an RPM either.
>
> + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/puppet-2.6.0
> find: debug: No such file or directory
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/b
James Turnbull wrote:
> For 40 days and 40 nights Facter wandered in the wilderness sustained
> only by the occasional patch and bottle of Kool-Aid.
>
> Slightly less tanned and equally happy Facter 1.5.8rc2 has followed rc1
> out of the desert.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated
James Turnbull wrote:
> In the long Puppet tradition of fast releases and agile iteration
> comes the 2.6.1 release!
>
> The third release candidate is now available and is a maintenance
> release in the 2.6.x branch.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http:
James Turnbull wrote:
> For 40 days and 40 nights Facter wandered in the wilderness
> sustained only by the occasional patch and bottle of Kool-Aid.
>
> Slightly less tanned and equally happy Facter 1.5.8 has arrived!
:)
> 1.5.8 is a feature and maintenance release containing a number of
> fixes,
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
> After upgrading Puppet from 0.24.8 to 2.6.1rc2 at my company, I
> notice that puppet agent's --tags option is not honored anymore:
Did you happen to file a ticket for this yet? I need to test more
myself, but I believe I saw this the other day too, with rc3.
--
Tod
Patrick wrote:
> I would assume that the package maintainer moved the default
> directory location.
The Fedora/EPEL packages don't change this. I'm not sure if there are
any other yum using distros out there. But if the OP meant one of
those two, then /var/lib/puppet is the default $vardir. The
James Turnbull wrote:
> In the long Puppet tradition of fast releases and agile iteration
> comes the 2.6.1 release!
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12 - 14 are available for testi
James Turnbull wrote:
> For example the Puppet respository that would have been cloned like:
>
> $ git clone git://github.com/reductivelabs/puppet.git
>
> Should now be cloned like:
>
> $ git clone git://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet.git
I know this came up in IRC the other day, so for anyone with
Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Douglas Garstang
>> Lets play rock paper scissors to see who files a bug...
>
> That's uncharitable and unfair.
Indeed. I usually joke that all complaints should be submitted in
unified diff format. I actually feel bad anytime I file a bug
micha...@tnrglobal.com wrote:
> On Sep 16, 4:23 pm, "R.I.Pienaar" wrote:
>> rpmbuild -ba -D 'dist .el5' -D 'rhel 5' -D '_without_augeas 1' puppet.spec
>
> Great- that works. I also just tried:
> rpmbuild --without augeas --without selinux --rebuild
> puppet-2.6.1-0.5.el5.src.rpm
FWIW, the spec f
James Turnbull wrote:
> And we're back with another exiting release in the 2.6.x branch -
> 2.6.2.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12 - 14 are available for testing.
Add the puppet
James Turnbull wrote:
> You can install the RPM package for CentOS or RHEL 5.5 by running the
> following from your shell:
> sudo sh -c "rpm -Uvh
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-4.noarch.rpm;
> \
> cd /tmp/ \
> && wget -c
> http://www.puppetlabs.com/down
Chuck wrote:
> I have migrated my EL5 servers from 0.25.5 to 2.6.2 and have no
> issues now. I did have some issues with 2.6.1 which are now fixed.
> I would like to see 2.6.2 in the official EPEL repository.
Thanks for the feedback Chuck! Were any changes to your config or
manifests required (a
Ben wrote:
> I did a server and all client upgrade to your 2.6.1 package from
> your 0.25.5 package without any problems w/ your packaging.
> Install, init scripts, etc all work fine.
>
> And now the upgrade to 2.6.2 looks good after 5 whole minutes.
>
> Server: CentOS 5.5
> Clients: CentOS 5.x, RH
James Turnbull wrote:
> All too quickly we're back with a maintenance release: 2.6.3. This
> release addresses some issues in the 2.6.2 release.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12
Steven VanDevender wrote:
> I'm not our local Cobbler/Kickstart expert, but the guy who created
> our Cobbler installation even figured out how to script a new host's
> initial registration with the puppetmaster (I believe the key idea
> is that there is a command-locked ssh identity key that allow
Daniel Kerwin wrote:
> i just upgraded some servers to Puppet 2.6.2 and it seems like it's
> not possible to use class names as tags anymore. I haven't found any
> documentation about this except a bug for 2.6.1 that should be fixed
> (http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4631).
> # ~ #
Maciej Skrzetuski wrote:
> Do you mean hosting your own yum repository in your own network?
> That is not a bad idea but it would be easier to just copy the files
> over to the puppets and then just rpm -ihv , wouldn't it?
No, it wouldn't be. You lose yum's ability to install depndencies for
one.
James Turnbull wrote:
> We're back with a maintenance release: 2.6.3. This
> release addresses some issues in the 2.6.2 release.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12 - 14 are availa
James Turnbull wrote:
> We're back with a maintenance release: 2.6.3. This
> release addresses some issues in the 2.6.2 release.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12 - 14 are availa
James Turnbull wrote:
> We're back with a new release: 2.6.3. This
> release addresses some issues in the 2.6.2 release.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12 - 14 are available for
Nick wrote:
> RHEL/CentOS 5 has nothing at all in base, and only v22.4 in RPMForge
You want to use EPEL for puppet in RHEL/CentOS, as the RPMForge
packages are way out of date. That said, we've stuck with 0.25.5 for
now in EPEL. But I have 2.6.x builds in my own repository to aid in
testing on R
James Turnbull wrote:
> Due to a security issue (see recent SECURITY email) we're releasing a
> 2.6.4 release immediately.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 14 are available for
Arnau Bria wrote:
> maybe it's a little OT... anyone knows if old puppet version from tmz
> repos are still available somewhere?
I have some of them locally. I clean out older versions to conserve
space on my fedorapeople.org account. Were you looking for a
particular previous version?
--
Todd
pzi wrote:
> Just as I said if I have a choice of using tar file from the source
> I will always favor it over rpms cooked in unknown environment.
Just FYI, the packages in my repo are built in the Fedora/EPEL
buildsystem. They're signed with the same GPG key I use for my mail
as well. Not that
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
> FWIW, I just went through the same annoyance, slightly different
> issues on Ubuntu 10.04, it's not just Red Hat/Cent OS that's way out
> of date.
It's always tricky to keep up with a relatively young and fast moving
project like puppet -- especially if you don't want
Nick Lewis wrote:
> We're back with a maintenance release: 2.6.5. This
> release addresses a number of bugs in the 2.6.x branch.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 14 are availa
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> We're back with a maintenance release: 2.6.5. This release addresses a
> number of bugs in the 2.6.x branch and adds a handful of features and
> documentation updates.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> We're back with a maintenance release: 2.6.5. This release addresses a
> number of bugs in the 2.6.x branch and adds a handful of features and
> documentation updates.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/
Paul Berry wrote:
> We're back with a maintenance release: 2.6.5. This release addresses
> a number of bugs in the 2.6.x branch and adds a handful of features
> and documentation updates.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/pu
Nigel Kersten wrote:
> The release is available for download at:
>
> http://puppetlabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet-2.6.5.tar.gz
Congratulations and thanks to all the folks who worked on the release!
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople
russell.fulton wrote:
> I'll repeat the question from my previous post: Is there a straight
> forward way to have a local rpm repository on the puppet server
> rather than relying on yum and the RHE channels?
It's trivial to run createrepo /path/to/rpms to create the yum
metadata. You can then s
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> This maintenance release fixes two issues with Puppet 2.6.5.
To help with testing on Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum
repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for testing.
Add the puppet.repo fi
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> This maintenance release fixes two issues with Puppet 2.6.5.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for testing.
Add the puppet.repo file from
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> Facter 1.5.9rc2 is a maintenance release containing fixes and updates.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for testing.
Add the puppet.repo
Hi T.J.,
T.J. Yang wrote:
> I looked at puppet 2.6.6-0.5 puppet client and server packages.
> Two questions so far about the client(R1) /server(R2) packaging.
>
> 1. why puppetca reside in client rpm but not in server rpm ?
While I don't speak for Jeff or the Puppet Labs folks, the packages
there
The arp command is in /sbin on Fedora/RHEL, not /usr/sbin. Using
Facter::Util::Resolution.exec is preferable to hard-coding the path.
---
lib/facter/arp.rb |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/facter/arp.rb b/lib/facter/arp.rb
index 65cf4c3..5035ad0
I wrote:
> I plan to get these packages built for Fedora and EPEL 5/6 testing
> repositories in the next few days. Anyone who finds showstopper bugs
> before then will be my hero for the day.
Puppet 2.6.6 packages are now in Fedora and EPEL testing repositories.
Anyone testing these packages is e
Hi TJ,
TJ Yang wrote:
> I am not familiar with yum. Would you mind provide a simple
> instruction to enable yum to install your test package ?
You must enable the updates-testing repo on Fedora (or epel-testing on
RHEL/CentOS).
yum --enablerepo updates-testing install puppet
--
Todd
Ben Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:17:17PM -0500, TJ Yang wrote:
>
>> I am not familiar with yum. Would you mind provide a simple
>> instruction to enable yum to install your test package ?
>
> http://www.craigdunn.org/2010/08/part-1-installing-puppet-2-6-1-on-centos-with-yumrpm/
>
> Co
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> Facter 1.5.9rc4 is a maintenance release containing fixes and updates.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for testing.
Add the puppet.repo
Tim Dunphy wrote:
> I am having a strange occurrence where I can run puppet on a client
> successfully and have it install httpd and php and a few other
> packages. The first run everything goes ok and everything installs
> perfectly the first run. But if I delete the packages (using yum
> remove
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> This release addresses issues with the Puppet 2.6.x series and adds
> the Inventory Service.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for test
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> Facter 1.5.9rc5 is a maintenance release containing fixes and updates.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for testing.
Add the puppet.repo
Matt Robinson wrote:
> This release addresses issues with the Puppet 2.6.x series.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for testing.
Add the puppet.repo file from
Nigel Kersten wrote:
> Facter 1.5.9rc6 is a maintenance release containing fixes and updates.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for testing.
Add the puppet.repo
treydock wrote:
> What is the current issue number? The only one I could find that
> mentions the same problem is this ,
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7203.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572722 and
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3693 are both relevant here.
I'd lo
Nathan Clemons wrote:
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3238 is the issue I was
> thinking of, but 3693 is probably a duplicate of that.
>
> These bugs have been open a really long time. Outside of lowering
> the MySQL timeout value, are there any workarounds for this problem?
> I can't reall
Rene wrote:
> In our environment, we have a non standard /etc/skel directory. The
> content of that directory is managed via puppet. How do I guarantee,
> that the content of that directory is on the system before a user is
> created. Do I need a require attribute on every user creation
> statement
Trevor Hemsley wrote:
> What's the correct yum repo to use for installing Puppet & Facter on
> RHEL5 and Centos5?
>
> I used to get them from the dlutter-rhel5 repo but this seems to be
> massively out of date now - latest version of puppet-server in there
> is 0.24.5-1.el5 and facter 1.5.4-1.el5.
Trevor Hemsley wrote:
> I have EPEL itself enabled as one of my repos but epel-testing is
> generally disabled - enabled only when I need specific things from
> it.
That works.
> Currently epel-testing for RHEL5/CentOS5 appears to have a wrong
> package in it for facter (1.5.5-1.el4 vs .el5). I s
Trevor Hemsley wrote:
> They are correct but they were not before. What I seem to have
> discovered that I didn't know before is that `yum clean all` needs to be
> told to --enablerepo=epel-testing in order to clean the cache for that
> repo (yes, it's documented but only when you bother to look it
Ricky Zhou wrote:
> puppet-0.24.8-1.el5.1 and facter-1.5.5-1.el5 are available in EPEL
> (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux), if you're using RHEL or CentOS.
> In fact, I think the maintainer is on this list :-)
Yep, several of us are. And if the latest stable isn't new enough for
you, I have 0
James Turnbull wrote:
> This is the beta2 release of Puppet 0.25.0.
>
> It is available at:
>
> http://reductivelabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet-0.25.0beta2.tar.gz
>
> This is not production ready code - it is a beta release for
> testing.
There are now packages for Fedora 10/11 and EL 4/5 in my t
Mark Plaksin wrote:
> I'm sure you know this but when you talk about version control be
> sure to mention a syntax-checking pre-commit hook. That has saved
> us countless hours. This page has hooks for SVN and Git:
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetVersionControl
Indeed, this hel
Mark Plaksin wrote:
>> One potential fix for that is to check for deletions, like so:
>
> Thanks for doing work for us :) We noticed the need for this but
> haven't had a chance to fix it. Your change works great. I updated the
> Wiki.
Cool. Credit for that one goes to Ricky Zhou. When we add
James Turnbull wrote:
> This is the rc1 release of Puppet 0.25.0.
There are now packages for Fedora 10/11/rawhide and EL 4/5 in my
testing repository at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Please report any packaging or repository bugs to me and not to the
Puppet or Fedora bug trackers
James Turnbull wrote:
> It appears you are on leave! Congratulations! As you would know we
> all love a holiday. In future though could you consider tuning your
> out-of-office email to only respond to mailing lists once.
Even once is too much for an autoresponse to a mailing list! But it's
of
From: Lance Dillon
---
lance dillon wrote:
> I tried to post this to puppet-dev but it doesn't look like I have
> permission, so here it is on puppet-users for anybody to do something with.
> There seems to be a typo in the following file:
>
> [riffr...@hobbes puppet-0.25.0]$ diff -u ext/nagios/c
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
