Thanks everyone for their input. I'll press on with Puppet and if I
run into performance issues then I'll bring them up in this forum.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 01:10 +0100, Thomas Bellman wrote:
> Trevor Vaughan top-posted:
>
> > Just out of curiosity, do the ones that take longer happen to be 64 bit?
>
> Well, yes, they are indeed 64 bit (x86_64). But that doesn't
> distinguish them from the quicker ones. They are all running
>
On Tuesday 23 Feb 2010 16:22:44 Lindsay Holmwood wrote:
> Performance, expressiveness, stability. Pick two.
>
You make it sound like it's impossible to write a well performing, expressive
and stable system in C/C++, etc. Surely you can't think that?
I once had an idea of using puppet to also m
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Michael Gliwinski
wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 Feb 2010 16:22:44 Lindsay Holmwood wrote:
>> Performance, expressiveness, stability. Pick two.
>>
>
> You make it sound like it's impossible to write a well performing, expressive
> and stable system in C/C++, etc. Surely y
Hi David,
I was just looking a bit more into augeas:
Is there a way to set variables in augeas wit values obtained by a
'get' statement?
Like:
...
augtool> get /files/etc/sysconfig/kernel/MODULES_LOADED_ON_BOOT
/files/etc/sysconfig/kernel/MODULES_LOADED_ON_BOOT = "ipv6"
...
Thus having a variabl
Hi Andrew,
Just noticed that ssh::auth::server doesn't require the resource for ~/.ssh
directory. Considering the documentation says it does (in Examples -> 1. With
account management at the bottom mentions that 'require => [User[$title],
File["$home/.ssh"]]' is implicitly included in both cli
Brice Figureau wrote:
It would be interesting in finding where (when?) the time is taken. I'm
wondering if it comes from the master or puppetd itself. Does running
with --debug gives more information.
Maybe it does. I do need to look into this sometime, but I won't have
the time for yet a cou
On Wednesday 24 Feb 2010 10:19:57 Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > You make it sound like it's impossible to write a well performing,
> > expressive and stable system in C/C++, etc. Surely you can't think that?
>
> I don't think that.
>
> What I do think is that something like Puppet that needs to abstr
Hi there,
On 23 feb, 10:19, ascodemus wrote:
> Q1) How can I include a class for a node depending on the status of
> the managed node? Example is it possible to do include a class based
> on existence of a file e.g. “/root/puppet/dl580” on the managed puppet-
> client node like:
Nope, that's no
I've got an Apache module and a Nagios module which "require"s the
Apache module, in the Nagios module we need to add the apache user to
the nagios group, what would be the best most scalable method to do
this? Assuming we might have other modules for webapps which need to
add the apache user to ot
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Dick Davies
wrote:
> Does anyone have a reference on how to write functions -
> the reductive labs docs seem a little broken today.
Never mind, found it.
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/WritingYourOwnFunctions
--
You received this message because you
Dick Davies wrote:
# this gets used by several classes
$activedbhost = "mysql1.mydomain.com"
host { "db.hosting.mydomain.com":
ensure => present,
ip => ip_of($activedbhost)
}
'ip_of()' is what Puppet calls a 'function', right?
Does anyone have a reference on how to write them -
On Feb 24, 1:17 am, Brian Ferris wrote:
> I see it changing the
> status of the service from stopped to running, and yet my Java service
> fails with random NoClassDefFound errors.
For classes belonging to your application, to external jars, or to the
system library?
[...]
> Now, I know you'
Hello members,
We are using Puppet-Server 0.24.8 with Factor (1.5.2-1.20) and Puppet
0.24.5 (for client nodes) on our SuSE Machines and its working fine. We
are now planning to upgrade to latest stable release 0.25.* for server
(with factor) and client-nodes. We just like to enquire you if the
On Feb 24, 1:17 am, Brian Ferris wrote:
> What's the difference in execution contexts?
One more guess: are you running SELinux in enforcing mode?
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to pup
PS: my previous mail might be filtered as junk because I used wildcard
in the subject. Therefore, I am writting again.
Hello members,
We are using Puppet-Server 0.24.8 with Factor (1.5.2-1.20) and Puppet
0.24.5 (for client nodes) on our SuSE Machines and its working fine. We
are now planning
I see your point, but this is perhaps specific to the domain of
> configuration
> management systems? I mean just look at some of the largest free software
> communities like KDE, which is primarily written in C++ which doesn't seem
> to
> be in any way diminishing the number of contributors.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Michael Gliwinski
wrote:
> I see your point, but this is perhaps specific to the domain of configuration
> management systems? I mean just look at some of the largest free software
> communities like KDE, which is primarily written in C++ which doesn't seem to
> b
Sorry if I wasn't clear in the original post. I've definitely looked at the
contents of the environment (dump of env) and there is no difference in the
two calling contexts. I've also dumped the contents of
System.getProperties() (equivalent of Java's environment) and again there is
no difference
Yes to running in enforcing mode. I just tried turning enforcing mode off
with a call to "setenforce 0" and I still get the same behavior.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:14 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 24, 1:17 am, Brian Ferris wrote:
> > What's the difference in execution contexts?
>
> One
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/02/10 3:00 AM, Michael Gliwinski wrote:
> I see your point, but this is perhaps specific to the domain of configuration
> management systems? I mean just look at some of the largest free software
> communities like KDE, which is primarily writ
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:37:15PM -0600, James Cammarata wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell
> wrote:
> > I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
> > article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
> > abbreviate massively: Puppe
Hi,
I configured my "puppet.conf" with:
/[puppetmasterd]
environments= testing,production
templatedir = /var/lib/puppet/templates
reports = tagmail,rrdgraph,store
reportdir = /var/lib/puppet/reports
reportfrom = r...@hostname
On Feb 24, 6:59 am, Rus Hughes wrote:
> I've got an Apache module and a Nagios module which "require"s the
> Apache module, in the Nagios module we need to add the apache user to
> the nagios group, what would be the best most scalable method to do
> this? Assuming we might have other modules for
Hi
So, some of us would like to be able to set the nice value on puppetd.
However, we don't want all of our services (and some of our execs)
re-niced.
Would it be feasible/practical to have the ability to set the nice
value explicitly on Service and Exec calls?
http://projects.reductivelabs.c
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Just noticed that ssh::auth::server doesn't require the resource for ~/.ssh
> directory. Considering the documentation says it does (in Examples -> 1.
> With
> account management at the bottom mentions that 'require => [User[$title],
> File["$home/.ssh"]]' is implicitly inclu
One problem that we frequently run into while building and supporting
puppet infrastructures, is some cowboy developer who insists that he
needs Python 3.1, PHP6, SWiG 1.3.40, etc, and these packages are not
available in our Distro's stable package repository.
Have you ever tried to build a slotte
I would like to not get a tagmail report when "puppetd --test" is
run. Is there a tag that is applied when puppetd is running
daemonized vs. non-daemonized? I could just run "puppetd --test -no-
report", but I don't want to rely on other users to remember to run it
this way. I was hoping I could
Eric Gerlach wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:37:15PM -0600, James Cammarata wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell
wrote:
I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
abbreviate massively:
On 24/02/10 17:31, Eric Gerlach wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:37:15PM -0600, James Cammarata wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell
>> wrote:
>>> I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
>>> article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and C
I'll get there, I just don't have access to my account information at
the moment.
Trevor
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Peter Meier wrote:
> Hi
>
>> So, some of us would like to be able to set the nice value on puppetd.
>> However, we don't want all of our services (and some of our execs)
>> r
I have a question hopefully someone here can help me out with. I have a
module that I didn't write, I got it from the github. it's the postgres
module. I'm running on CentOS 5. In the module there is this:
case $ensure {
present: {
exec { "Create $name postgres db":
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:42 +0100, Frederik Wagner wrote:
> > If you can live with replacing the entire list, you can just use augeas:
> >
> >augeas { "my_boot_modules":
> >changes => "set
> > /files/etc/sysconfig/kernel/MODULES_LOADED_ON_BOOT '$mymodules'"
> >}
> >
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:28 +0100, Frederik Wagner wrote:
> I was just looking a bit more into augeas:
> Is there a way to set variables in augeas wit values obtained by a
> 'get' statement?
It's possible if you use Augeas from Ruby by doing something like
aug = Augeas::open(...)
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 14:02 -0500, Rob McBroom wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Jesús Couto wrote:
>
> > On a tangent, anybody using augeas under puppet to
> > manage /etc/sudoers? ... and how?
>
> I tried, but all I could get it to do was add the entries to the end
> of `/etc/sudoers` over
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 08:44 -0800, Tim Stoop wrote:
> On 22 feb, 20:35, David Lutterkort wrote:
> > You want to restrict when to make those changes with the onlyif
> > paramater, something like
> >
> > augeas { "...":
> > context => ...
> > changes => ...
> >
Hi Patrick.
I checked workaround you suggested.
Accroding to workaround, messages didn't appear any more.
Thank you for telling me workaroud.
Nobuchika Tanaka.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email
37 matches
Mail list logo
